Shake and bake baby! Even after the homecookin the lions have been served.

anavictoria

New member
Jul 18, 2006
0
0
0
Baker playing well enough to win . OL and receivers dropped a lot of balls . Plus the field goal misses
 

Raysor

Well-known member
Mar 29, 2002
633
7,442
93
10-10 at the half. Even after the homecookin the lions have been served.
I'm glad I wasn't the only one seeing it that way. There was an early call on the Bucs. D, that had a false start on the right tackle not called. I ran it back in slow mo just to be sure. How do they miss that? They just didn't want to call anything not obvious against the Lions, and even some that were.
 

ETU

New member
Feb 5, 2003
58,648
4,720
0
Bullsh**. Lions won and crybabies have to complain. Always the same posters. Baker had a great season but came up short today. It happens. He will survive. Great season, Baker.
 

ppchj98

New member
Oct 22, 2006
0
2
0
Bullsh**. Lions won and crybabies have to complain. Always the same posters. Baker had a great season but came up short today. It happens. He will survive. Great season, Baker.
Did Roger put you up to this?
 
L

Larry4681

Guest
I’ve never been one to cry about the refs (well except Oregon) but some fans do it even when it doesn’t apply.
 

joebidensmask

Active member
Sep 13, 2005
17,928
1,202
68
I don’t have any beef with the Lions winning after all the great former Sooners they have taken. I was hoping Baker would have prevailed but it was not to be yesterday, sadly
 

OrangeHorde

New member
Apr 5, 2004
9,595
410
0
I’ve never been one to cry about the refs (well except Oregon) but some fans do it even when it doesn’t apply.
I normally have nothing against the refs as they get it correct the majority of the time. But yesterday Baker threw an out pattern to Godwin (I believe) and it clearly was caught beyond the first down marker. Pylon camera was clearly visible as well as the first down marker. Godwin clearly caught the ball beyond both the camera and marker but the ref marked the ball short of both. Luckily, Baker faked a handoff and ran for twelve yards on the next play and a first down. But the previous marking of the ball was egregious. No comments from the announcers either on the misplacement.
 
O

OUSOONER67

Guest
I normally have nothing against the refs as they get it correct the majority of the time. But yesterday Baker threw an out pattern to Godwin (I believe) and it clearly was caught beyond the first down marker. Pylon camera was clearly visible as well as the first down marker. Godwin clearly caught the ball beyond both the camera and marker but the ref marked the ball short of both. Luckily, Baker faked a handoff and ran for twelve yards on the next play and a first down. But the previous marking of the ball was egregious. No comments from the announcers either on the misplacement.
Baker was also down when he threw the ball away to avoid a loss of yds, Bucs scored on next play at the end of 3rd qtr. Detroit should have challenged it but they didn't.
It goes both ways.
 
O

OUSOONER67

Guest
He wasn’t down lol.
What does he know? He gets paid a lot of money I imagine to know more than Larry.
Moot point at this point. Was hoping Bake and the Bucs could get to the SB but it was a long shot.

Detroit should have challenged the near-sack on Baker Mayfield​

NBC rules analyst Terry McAulay said that had Detroit head coach Dan Campbell challenged the near-sack on Baker Mayfield on the play that he threw the ball out of bounds, the play would have been ruled a sack because Mayfield’s calf hit the ground before the ball was thrown.
 
L

Larry4681

Guest
It was very very close. I don’t think enough to change the call