They aren't going to pack it in though, they are idiotically going to press and allow UK to shoot 60% from the field on mainly dunks, layups and FTs.Originally posted by BigBlueManSouthCentralKY:
Like everyone else, they are at the mercy of all our shooters having a bad night. What else could they do but pack it in. If they don't Towns and Lyles will eat them up inside.
Maybe the 'new wrinkle' Battier is talking about. Just thinking about them continuously pressing, IMO they would have to score in the 80's and they don't shoot well from anywhere. Just can't see them turning us over a lot in this way. Normally, knowing how we play in a fast paced game, we blow teams like that away. That kind of game just fuels our intensity level and if our intensity level is on high, we have seen numerous times what happens.Originally posted by UKWildcats#8:
They aren't going to pack it in though, they are idiotically going to press and allow UK to shoot 60% from the field on mainly dunks, layups and FTs.Originally posted by BigBlueManSouthCentralKY:
Like everyone else, they are at the mercy of all our shooters having a bad night. What else could they do but pack it in. If they don't Towns and Lyles will eat them up inside.
This.. I don't think this game will even be close.. IMO, WVU is no better than Arkansas..Originally posted by UKWildcats#8:
They aren't going to pack it in though, they are idiotically going to press and allow UK to shoot 60% from the field on mainly dunks, layups and FTs.Originally posted by BigBlueManSouthCentralKY:
Like everyone else, they are at the mercy of all our shooters having a bad night. What else could they do but pack it in. If they don't Towns and Lyles will eat them up inside.
We are one of the best teams in not turning the ball over. They are the best team in forcing them. Something has to give - and it won't be a wild swing either way. So we must assume we'll end up meeting somewhere in the middle. We average around 10 TOs per game, they force nearly 20. So we end up with 15. Then they'll have to actually turn those in to points against our defense.Originally posted by BigBlueManSouthCentralKY:
Maybe the 'new wrinkle' Battier is talking about. Just thinking about them continuously pressing, IMO they would have to score in the 80's and they don't shoot well from anywhere. Just can't see them turning us over a lot in this way. Normally, knowing how we play in a fast paced game, we blow teams like that away. That kind of game just fuels our intensity level and if our intensity level is on high, we have seen numerous times what happens.Originally posted by UKWildcats#8:
They aren't going to pack it in though, they are idiotically going to press and allow UK to shoot 60% from the field on mainly dunks, layups and FTs.Originally posted by BigBlueManSouthCentralKY:
Like everyone else, they are at the mercy of all our shooters having a bad night. What else could they do but pack it in. If they don't Towns and Lyles will eat them up inside.
Huggins has to know this and just can't see him being that stubborn and idiotic. Could see them trying it but getting out of it in a hurry and going to plan 2, slowing it down and packing it in. Trying to keep the score down.
They say we don't play hard, obviously they haven't watched us a lot. When we come to play our intensity level is ridiculous and there would be nothing they could do about it. They are at the mercy of what kind of mood we are in. And them running their mouths was the most stupid thing they could have done. It does make the game even more interesting, them knowing what they will do.
A phrenologist's dream (Maverick 2015).Originally posted by JerseyCat84:
Speaking of wrinkles, what are those things on Battier's scalp?
We are not one if the best defensive rebounding teams actually. That is one thing we do need to improve on during this run. We rank somewhere around 120th or 130th in defensive rebounding. We took a major hit on the boards when Alex went down. We need to make sure we hit the glass both offensively and defensively tomorrow. I still think the key will be to break the press and I like our guard with their skill set. The officiating concerns me the most though. I just hope they call the fouls and do not allow this to become a mugfest.Originally posted by TheDude73:
We are one of the best teams in not turning the ball over. They are the best team in forcing them. Something has to give - and it won't be a wild swing either way. So we must assume we'll end up meeting somewhere in the middle. We average around 10 TOs per game, they force nearly 20. So we end up with 15. Then they'll have to actually turn those in to points against our defense.Originally posted by BigBlueManSouthCentralKY:
Maybe the 'new wrinkle' Battier is talking about. Just thinking about them continuously pressing, IMO they would have to score in the 80's and they don't shoot well from anywhere. Just can't see them turning us over a lot in this way. Normally, knowing how we play in a fast paced game, we blow teams like that away. That kind of game just fuels our intensity level and if our intensity level is on high, we have seen numerous times what happens.Originally posted by UKWildcats#8:
They aren't going to pack it in though, they are idiotically going to press and allow UK to shoot 60% from the field on mainly dunks, layups and FTs.Originally posted by BigBlueManSouthCentralKY:
Like everyone else, they are at the mercy of all our shooters having a bad night. What else could they do but pack it in. If they don't Towns and Lyles will eat them up inside.
Huggins has to know this and just can't see him being that stubborn and idiotic. Could see them trying it but getting out of it in a hurry and going to plan 2, slowing it down and packing it in. Trying to keep the score down.
They say we don't play hard, obviously they haven't watched us a lot. When we come to play our intensity level is ridiculous and there would be nothing they could do about it. They are at the mercy of what kind of mood we are in. And them running their mouths was the most stupid thing they could have done. It does make the game even more interesting, them knowing what they will do.
And, they are #1 in fouls given (23.3 per game), #1 in opponent's free throws (25+ per game), and one of the worst defensive rebounding teams in the country.
Finally, they are the best offensive rebounding team in the land, but we are one of the best defensive rebounding teams. So again, assume this to end up somewhere in the middle - we allow 9 OREBS per game, they get 16.5 per game - give them 13 and call it a day. Then, as with the turnovers, they have to manage to turn those OREBS in to points - again, not easy to do with our size and defense.
In other words, they need a LOT to go right for them beyond just their snazzy turnover and OREB prowess.
My friends and I used to refer to him as "Raisin Head" during his Dukie days. He looks like a Shar Pei.Originally posted by JerseyCat84:
Speaking of wrinkles, what are those things on Battier's scalp?
Wrong. We are ranked #41 in defensive rebounding at 25.64 per game as of every game this year, including the NCAA tournament. Not sure where you're looking.Originally posted by UKCATSFREAK:
We are not one if the best defensive rebounding teams actually. That is one thing we do need to improve on during this run. We rank somewhere around 120th or 130th in defensive rebounding. We took a major hit on the boards when Alex went down. We need to make sure we hit the glass both offensively and defensively tomorrow. I still think the key will be to break the press and I like our guard with their skill set. The officiating concerns meOriginally posted by TheDude73:
We are one of the best teams in not turning the ball over. They are the best team in forcing them. Something has to give - and it won't be a wild swing either way. So we must assume we'll end up meeting somewhere in the middle. We average around 10 TOs per game, they force nearly 20. So we end up with 15. Then they'll have to actually turn those in to points against our defense.Originally posted by BigBlueManSouthCentralKY:
Maybe the 'new wrinkle' Battier is talking about. Just thinking about them continuously pressing, IMO they would have to score in the 80's and they don't shoot well from anywhere. Just can't see them turning us over a lot in this way. Normally, knowing how we play in a fast paced game, we blow teams like that away. That kind of game just fuels our intensity level and if our intensity level is on high, we have seen numerous times what happens.Originally posted by UKWildcats#8:
They aren't going to pack it in though, they are idiotically going to press and allow UK to shoot 60% from the field on mainly dunks, layups and FTs.Originally posted by BigBlueManSouthCentralKY:
Like everyone else, they are at the mercy of all our shooters having a bad night. What else could they do but pack it in. If they don't Towns and Lyles will eat them up inside.
Huggins has to know this and just can't see him being that stubborn and idiotic. Could see them trying it but getting out of it in a hurry and going to plan 2, slowing it down and packing it in. Trying to keep the score down.
They say we don't play hard, obviously they haven't watched us a lot. When we come to play our intensity level is ridiculous and there would be nothing they could do about it. They are at the mercy of what kind of mood we are in. And them running their mouths was the most stupid thing they could have done. It does make the game even more interesting, them knowing what they will do.
And, they are #1 in fouls given (23.3 per game), #1 in opponent's free throws (25+ per game), and one of the worst defensive rebounding teams in the country.
Finally, they are the best offensive rebounding team in the land, but we are one of the best defensive rebounding teams. So again, assume this to end up somewhere in the middle - we allow 9 OREBS per game, they get 16.5 per game - give them 13 and call it a day. Then, as with the turnovers, they have to manage to turn those OREBS in to points - again, not easy to do with our size and defense.
In other words, they need a LOT to go right for them beyond just their snazzy turnover and OREB prowess.
His head is actually a puff of Super Sugar Crisp.Originally posted by JerseyCat84:
Speaking of wrinkles, what are those things on Battier's scalp?
Originally posted by doc4UK:
One reason we rank so poorly in defensive rebounding is the poor quality of shots launched against our defense. This results in shots which do not come off the rim close to the basket where our big guys are positioned Our guards are often taking off down the court and are not in position to get a long deflection.But we don't rank poorly. We're 41st out of 351 (coming in to the NCAA tournament we were 25th, so we lost a little thanks to most likely the Cincinnati game). Are you referring to the other guy here that inaccurately stated we were 130th?
In fact, when you combine total rebounds as a percentage of total missed shots (offensive and defensive), we rank #8 in the country at 55.3% (meaning we rebound over 55% of all missed shots on both ends combined). And we are #13 in the country in total rebounds per game average at 38.5 (WVU is 59th at 36.5).
Can you tell us what the tweak was?Originally posted by BBBLazing:
Is a "new wrinkle" similar to a "tweak?" Nobody believed us last year, right?
More like a large testicleOriginally posted by CatPhight:
His head is actually a puff of Super Sugar Crisp.Originally posted by JerseyCat84:
Speaking of wrinkles, what are those things on Battier's scalp?
![]()
Sorry, but I commented on this absurd "stat" in another thread. No way this is a statistic that just happened to be tracked all year long. And, no way ESPN had enough time for someone (intern) to sit and watch all 36 UK games and tally turnovers caused by presses, given WVU just won Sunday and it's only Thursday.Originally posted by RipThru:
Let me preface this by saying I absolutely can't stand Shane Battier. But as far as the "turning it over 25% of the time" comment goes, what I heard him say on Finebaum was that Kentucky was only pressed on 5% of their possessions this year. Of that 5%, we turned it over on 25% of those. First thought that came to mind was, "there's a reason we were only pressed 5% of the time" and second thought was, "damn, that's an obscure statistic". Either way he's a dumbass.