Bull, did you not read the post where Plaino said that Shay knees were still injured to the extent that could not bear the weight needed to hit. I am in Lubbock for the series. I sat right behind and slightly to the left of home plate. I looked extremely close at Shay's knees. Both seemed to handle the her weight as she swung the bat! But what the hell do I know. There is a hidden message in this postITS GREAT TO HAVE A HEALTHY SHAY.
You have absolutely not seen her do what you claim. But you go ahead and fabricate whatever makes you think you are right! I apoligized once to you for calling you an arrogant ***. I regret that. You are all that as well as a self serving know it all. All that I ever needed to know about you was when you said that you could be a DECENt women's basketball coach if you had Geno Auriema's talent! Arrogance and utter stupidity!!!I've seen her twice in the last month, have some soft of contact with the ground that took some time to resume the game because of knee issues. Lighting up Tech players with the wing blowing out, isn't the same as hitting quality pitching, and the quickness required to do that. Tech is over 100th in the RPI ranking for a reason. Their pitchers aren't very good.
Get back to me when Knighten goes yard against somebody who's worth a damn.
I've seen her twice in the last month, have some soft of contact with the ground that took some time to resume the game because of knee issues. Lighting up Tech players with the wing blowing out, isn't the same as hitting quality pitching, and the quickness required to do that. Tech is over 100th in the RPI ranking for a reason. Their pitchers aren't very good.
Get back to me when Knighten goes yard against somebody who's worth a damn.
And that soft contact was because of her knees. You know that for a fact! You have talked with the OU softball staff ?You have absolutely not seen her do what you claim. But you go ahead and fabricate whatever makes you think you are right! I apoligized once to you for calling you an arrogant ***. I regret that. You are all that as well as a self serving know it all. All that I ever needed to know about you was when you said that you could be a DECENt women's basketball coach if you had Geno Auriema's talent! Arrogance and utter stupidity!!!
Plaino, I know you bleed Sooner sports, so why are you much more pro football than the other sports? Maybe I'm wrong, but I never seem to recall you pointing out the negatives for the boys like you do for the gals. Is it really so important to be so negative instead of hopeful? You have to think there is at least some chance for a repeat. 50/50, 25/75??? "So there's a chance". Or not IYO?
There is a reason Plaino points out the negative in the women's sports more so than the men's. It is because he is a man and as such he automatically knows more than any coach who coaches women's sports. Look at all the post where he questions Patty Gasso's coaching decisions. He has never coached baseball or softball at the high school or college level, yet he is the self appointed expert on all things related to fundamentals and strategies. He knows more than Sherri Coale because Sherri coaches women. He claims that he could be a decent women's basketball coach if he had Geno Auriema's talent. The reason OU lost to Alabama in the 2015 softball super regionals was because the OU hitters stances were too wide and that did not allow them to hit the rise ball thrown by Alabama pitcher Alexis Osorio. Wow! Plaino knows more than OU's hitting coach.Plaino, I know you bleed Sooner sports, so why are you much more pro football than the other sports? Maybe I'm wrong, but I never seem to recall you pointing out the negatives for the boys like you do for the gals. Is it really so important to be so negative instead of hopeful? You have to think there is at least some chance for a repeat. 50/50, 25/75??? "So there's a chance". Or not IYO?
I am incredibly pro OU softball. And women's gymnastics and men's gymnastics.
I'd ask you if OU played Kansas in football and eeked out a ten point win, playing with mediocrity, do you think anyone would let that sit. They'd be all over Stoops and Stoops and every other coach. Well,e every coach except Riley.
McBrider, I've seen her chase down a foul down the right field line, and undergo a four or five minute delay before the game was resumed. I didn't make that up. And I've seen a shorter delay under similar circumstances since. Can't tell you the specific game, but I saw it happen. She's not 100% and neither is Romero, even though both had three run homers today.
OkBama, we were a unanimous number one heading into the season, returning the entire infield, the WCWS MPV and the starting centerfielder for the defending national champs who were adding a top pitcher from Mizzou and a great incoming five player recruiting class. Right now, we're at best a bubble team to make the top eight.
We all saw two years ago, what happens when you are unfairly forced to go on the road in the Supers. If we don't make it this year, it might not be unfair. If that isn't disappointing to you, then my question to you is why?
I think there are three injuries that are not fully healed, that impact this team. I also think that when you're available on tv a lot, teams learn more about hitter pitch weaknesses, or at least vulnerabilities. And they know better what they might see from OUr staff.
I didn't expect this team to win 30 straight like they did last season. But I think this group is more beatable for whatever reason. I suspect we'll see Paige Parker undergo more post season responsibility. Paige #1 wasn't great early in the year. She gave up key homers especially, that cost OU at least two important wins.
And I still think the details of the rigthie shift when Paige #2 is pitching, is counterproductive in multiple ways. I've seen the outfielders playing short stop not make plays the last two weeks, that Arnold would have made if she'd been at short and Caleigh at second and the outfielder where we put Clifton during the shift. I also think it makes tho DP combination guys a little less reliable when they return to their normal places. I understand the opposite view. It's valid. I just disagree with it. And I think I'm allowed to do that, despite mcbrider's accusations. And I know what I see.
But he's the expert, so he must know better.
There is a reason Plaino points out the negative in the women's sports more so than the men's. It is because he is a man and as such he automatically knows more than any coach who coaches women's sports. Look at all the post where he questions Patty Gasso's coaching decisions. He has never coached baseball or softball at the high school or college level, yet he is the self appointed expert on all things related to fundamentals and strategies. He knows more than Sherri Coale because Sherri coaches women. He claims that he could be a decent women's basketball coach if he had Geno Auriema's talent. The reason OU lost to Alabama in the 2015 softball super regionals was because the OU hitters stances were too wide and that did not allow them to hit the rise ball thrown by Alabama pitcher Alexis Osorio. Wow! Plaino knows more than OU's hitting coach.
OUr infield defense has been less effective this year, than last with the same players returning with a year of experience. Maybe you have an explanation for that.
I'm "negative" about women's sports because I see it the same way I see men's sports. I believe they should be held to the same standard. If they're playing well, I praise the heck out of them. I've told 100 people in the last year, that OU played the most solid fundamentals defensively that I've seen from just about anybody in any sport in 2016. There has been a drop off in that respect just a little in 2017. A fundamental failure on a rundown last weekend was the difference in the game two loss to Baylor.
Yes Bull. I saw Shay's play on the bunt. Terrific play. And I think she got maybe a little break on the call. But Baylor hurt us with their bunting game. And I think a little part of it is that Knighten and Romero are a half a step slower this season due to leg issues.
And the offense has struggled against every top pitcher they've faced this year, and a few times against lesser ones. Not sure of the reason. Today they coasted. Yesterday, they didn't produce much against a very mediocre combination of pitching and defense. Tech is horrible, but got the go ahead run up late in the game. Thankfully, Lopez entered and shut them down.
BTW, I have said repeatedly that OU has a quality defense and quality pitching. And that makes us tough to beat in the post season, whether we're on the road or at home.
Selman is a step below elite, and she'd thrown ten innings Saturday and a couple in game two earlier on Sunday. When her arm was fresh, we couldn't lay off her rise ball. Baylor's defense wasn't great. But I understand that most teams don't play defense as close to as good as OU does. It's Patty's passion and their fundamentals are excellent. And I love that. Hitting can go up and down, and even pitching to a certain extent. But great defense can be consistent, and was a very important part of the NC last year.
But last year, they didn't run on Wodach. This year, she's not throwing out any more than anybody else. And even good, not necessarily great base runners are stealing bases. That didn't happen a year ago. The roll OU got on last season was a remarkable one. But they were clearly a top three or four team heading to the post season. That just isn't the case this year. And the team has taken just a small step back, despite having a true pitching staff this year, not just Parker.
Shay hit two more home runs today, 5 RBIs. She has four home runs for Lubbock this weekend. 14-3 run ruled in five.
Since this was Tech, I won't get excited. But, there is one very interesting aspect of Shay's development that does stand out. Right now, nearly all teams have played fifteen conference games and have three left. In conference play only:
Slugging Percentage:
--Leader: Shay Knighten 860
--second place 711
Home runs:
--Leader: Shay Knighten 6
--Second place: Pendley, Romero, and four others 4
RBIs:
---Leader: Shay Knighten 24
---second: Nicole Pendley 18
Total Bases:
---Leader: Shay Knighten 43
---Second: Sydney Romero 33
Runs scored:
---Leader: Shay Knighten and Caleigh Clifton 18
---Second: Nicole Mendes 17
Batting average:
---second: Nicole Mendes 462
---fourth: Shay Knighten 440
I would suggest that Shay just dominated the Big Twelve statistics.
Bull, I love your optimism and gentleness in your disagreement with me. It's okay. But last year, we were a three seed in the post season. We will be lucky to be in the top eight this year. I know, I know. You disagree. But I've seen Patty's occasional public comments. She would tell you that her team hasn't been quite as good. She wanted to be in the committee's top ten after last weekend, and it didn't happen. It's a long hill to climb. After today, I believe we'll be ahead of Baylor, but they weren't in the top ten either. Possible to pass LSU, who lost game three at home to Mizzou tonight, but I wouldn't count on it.
If we do end up at nine or ten or eleven as we were two years ago in the seeding, I'm sure you'll still argue that we haven't taken a step back, but there is no way we make top four. And that would be a small step back, whether you agree or not.
I still love you though.
When you say "there is no way we make top four" do you mean RPI or Polls or semis of the WCWS" ?
Speaking of Dalton, anyone know why she didnt play this weekendThere are two or three different questions involved in this discussion. First, there is the issue of this year's pitching vs last year's. Yes, it has improved. We do have more depth. The issue about Paige's home runs exists, but she has a slightly better ERA, fewer walks and hits allowed, and fewer hit batsmen. She has surrendered a lot fewer doubles. Here are facts:
http://stats.ncaa.org/player/index?...yer_seq=1646630.0&year_stat_category_id=11021
We still have to see how the others do in the playoffs. Incidentally, Brit Finney shut down Alabama,, 2-1, last night, her best start of the year. She walked the first hitter, who scored. Then, she shut Bama down on three hits. In the bottom of the seventh, Brit doubled home the tying run, putting the winning run on third. Then, two hitters later, a single to second made Brit a winner.
Chestnut is about 19-3 at Central Oklahoma, and she is now just shutting everyone down. Good at that level.
Then, there is the issue of Shay. Shay and Sydney may be my favorite players, and neither has been as good this year. It is obvious how much the surgery affected them. Sydney struck out four times last year. She had that in the first twenty games this year. They haven't been hitting it as hard. Even their singles were harder last year. Recently, both have begun to come around. But, they aren't quite where they were last year. Give it about two weeks.
Yes, they did pinch run for Shay a lot earlier in the year. They still do at times. She is a good runner. But, they don't want that knee re-injured. They are the reason that we haven't been as effective against good pitching. They can hit it when healthy. They are getting it back.
But, 13 to 5 is a big drop off in home runs. The good news is that Shay doesn't strike out as much, and she walks more. Same number of doubles.
http://stats.ncaa.org/player/index?game_sport_year_ctl_id=12580&stats_player_seq=1762160
But, Arnold is down a hundred points this year. Hatfield seems to have difficulty against better pitching. Wodach is off, although throwing isn't one area that is off, with the exception of one throw into center.
We really needed for someone to develop to replace Miller and Self. Dalton seemed to be an option. But, that may or may not work out. Mendes seems to be the answer that we had hoped for. Unfortunately, she didn't come around until after our early season struggles. Now, she creates havoc, and she could be the added attraction that we need to have a productive postseason. One outstanding speedster, not just good, can make a big difference. Think Turang. Bama had that one centerfielder that we just couldn't keep off base.
At this point, I think we are about the same as last year, if Sydney and Shay are healthy. Winning a CWS is all about having a good run. I think we have only won once when we didn't make an undefeated run--last year. It is a streak thing. We could use one pitcher, and I'm not so sure it isn't Lopez, to be an ace to help Parker. Right now, I have more confidence in Mariah than Lowary.
About that shift. I tend to think that it has caused us some defensive lapses as Hatfield has tried to cover second, etc. I am not a fan of the shift. But, I'm not so sure that Gasso isn't trying to psych out the opposition. She used only a partial shift against Tech as I understand. I want to see if she does it in the NCAAs.
If we have one other pitcher, I don't mind starting on the road. I think we can beat some of these on their home fields. I hope that if we don't host, we get to go to Oregon, Florida State, Auburn, or A&M. I think they are going to be in the top eight, and they don't belong. We'll see more when Oregon and Florida State meet in Eugene for three next week.
I still think it is OU, Florida, Tennessee, and Arizona.
The real question is whether we can make it to #8.No way we end up a top four seed in the tournament.
That's so wrong !
What a break through Bull!!! That's exactly what it is....it's a system designed to screw OU.I have a thought.The RPI rankings are so irrational & fradulent against OU
What a break through Bull!!! That's exactly what it is....it's a system designed to screw OU.[/QUOTE
Absolutely Billy, just look at the honest facts
LSU just moved ahead of OU in the RPI poll to #12 and LSU's last game last Saturday
was a LOSS to #31 ranked Missouri,
I've been around long enough to not blindly accept your "facts" as actual facts. I read your back and forth with Plaino in the other thread last week. You like to cling onto certain stats that benefit your case, then completely play dumb about or ignore the factors that are working against your case. If you actually read what Plaino was posting to you about what all factors into the RPI, then you would realize your comments about the RPI being biased against OU sounds absolutely stupid.Just the facts Billy just the honest facts.
I have a thought.The RPI rankings are so irrational & fradulent against OU that
those who run it want to put OU at #17 so we don't host a regional. (The top 16 teams host a regional)
Explain this OU beat then #10 Baylor two out of three games
including a 6-0 win in game three.
BAYLOR AFTER THE OU SERIES MOVES UP (YES MOVES UP) IN THE RPI TO #9. AND THEY PUT OU AT#12.
OU keeps winning 22 out of our last 23games & RPI moves us down to #13 and Baylor (Who lost to Oklahoma State is back at #10 LSU who moved ahead of OU to #12 just LOST THEIR LAST GAME TO #31 RANKED MISSOURI.....HMMM?????
In the meanwhile in the two large respected Softball polls the ESPN poll and the Coaches poll have OU #7 and Baylor #15
Patti Gasso needs to call the NCAA because of the RPI anti OU bias. The two major polls both have us at #7 and the RPI just moved us down to #13...Hmmm? Hmmm?
What will happen this week if we sweep OSU who beat Baylor last week?
I would guess the RPI would drop us again as the want to prohibit OU from hosting a regional. The top 16 teams host a regional and the fraudulent RPI wants us at #17 in the next two weeks