SIAP, so apparently, Clayton White darn near went to Shame's ***
- Thread starter Rhode Island Dork
- Start date
I didnt see or hear about it. BUT White's D gave up 28 Second Half points, He has NO ROOM TO *****!!
Yep. Can't grouse too much about the D this season, but they laid a turd in the 2nd half. Allowed the largest comeback in A&M history and gave up up what A&M folks are calling the best 4th down play in school history (that one is obviously very subjective), but a QB scramble on 4th and 12, basically for the game, to pick up 1st down is pretty epic.
Yep, and we had Reed wrapped up but couldn't finish tackle.
Heard it as well. But from a message board poster who claims "inside information."
Fwiw
Fwiw
Yeah, it sounds like one of those. But then, occasionally, very rarely, one of these ends up being found out to be true years later.
That's why I always add fwiw when I pass on rumors like that.
They were nose to nose......or if you love the movie Road House, nipple to nipple.
White will get a head coaching position this off season,, be it a smaller program, He willl be gone next year..
I don't know about any of this story. Doesn't seem to hold water.
But if White leaves, Beamer is screwed. For a HC who has struggled to hire quality assistants, having to replace both coordinators is a virtual death sentence.
For the most part they did lay a turd in the second half. But without them we’re also looking at a 20-3 game at halftime. In that event the comeback isn’t as notable. 17 point leads evaporate multiple times a season in college football. SC has almost pulled it off multiple times in a single game.
If Beamer is still here to be screwed then we're all screwed.
Fike this under thing Shane better not bring up tomorrow.
If any of the reporters asks if something like this happens, his answer should be "Nothing of the sort happened. Where did you hear that?"
"It's been rumored on social media." - reporter
"Maybe you shouldn't base your questions on social media fodder." - Shane.
Period. Don't preemptively pontificate about social media nonsense. If it didn't happen, he shouldn't even hear about it until a reporter asks about it.
If any of the reporters asks if something like this happens, his answer should be "Nothing of the sort happened. Where did you hear that?"
"It's been rumored on social media." - reporter
"Maybe you shouldn't base your questions on social media fodder." - Shane.
Period. Don't preemptively pontificate about social media nonsense. If it didn't happen, he shouldn't even hear about it until a reporter asks about it.
Kornblut is the only reporter that MIGHT have the testicular fortitude to ask about it.
"Shane...two parter here. Is there any truth to the rumor of an altercation between you and Clayton White on Sunday? And is that how you got your black eye?" - Phil Kornblut
He 100% will, too. That guy is a savage. The problem is that Shane's too immature to answer the questions without losing his little mind.Jack might
Well, right on cue...he comes out today and leads his presser talking about it. 
Well, right on cue...he comes out today and leads his presser talking about it.
Seriously?
Swifty said it best.
It's not so much that he brought it up. I think it would be a good funny of him to do so if he didn't comment on "social media horse garbage" all the time. Instead it's a bad funny BECAUSE he talks about that stuff so much and we all knew he would mention it.
