Naming someone Special Teams Coordinator is just letters on a paper. I
Yes it brings accountable for resultsThis is a step forward for our football program. Some people will say Buh was already working with the special teams so no real change. But that isn't true. Giving him the formal coordinator title puts him in charge of the game plan and makes him accountable for results. Our special teams were horrible last year. This must improve, and I think Buh can do it. Most importantly, we need to get the right athletes into the right roles and teach them not to miss their assignments. Buh is now in a better position to do all of that.
I have to keep reminding myself that this is not a coaches forum or even an informed fan forum. This is a place with many knowledgeable fans and also many fans who simply love UK but have zero knowledge about how the game works. That is perfectly ok but it is a bit trying when the lesser informed spew out comments like they are experts. Sometimes it is ok just to read and learn.
That said,
It is true that probably every coach on the staff has the ability to coach special teams. However, somebody has to be in charge or it is chaos. The perfect example is last year in the Vandy game, Swindle got injured and had to come out on offense. No problem, a sub was sent right in. Here is the problem. Swindle also played on the field goal team. Between our committee of special teams coaches, nobody realized that a player was injured on the FG team and nobody thought to send in a sub. The delay of game penalty took us out of field goal range and it greatly impacted the game and possibly changed the outcome. Stoops said this himself in the post game briefing. Had there been a special teams coach, he would have known Swindle was out and would have had a replacement ready to go in on 4th down. A single play like that can be the difference in going to a bowl or going home.
The back up should of known. We had kids in high school that were capable of realizing the guy ahead of them was injured and they went to the coach and had their helmet. Player accountability was low last year and stoops also acknowledged that.I have to keep reminding myself that this is not a coaches forum or even an informed fan forum. This is a place with many knowledgeable fans and also many fans who simply love UK but have zero knowledge about how the game works. That is perfectly ok but it is a bit trying when the lesser informed spew out comments like they are experts. Sometimes it is ok just to read and learn.
That said,
It is true that probably every coach on the staff has the ability to coach special teams. However, somebody has to be in charge or it is chaos. The perfect example is last year in the Vandy game, Swindle got injured and had to come out on offense. No problem, a sub was sent right in. Here is the problem. Swindle also played on the field goal team. Between our committee of special teams coaches, nobody realized that a player was injured on the FG team and nobody thought to send in a sub. The delay of game penalty took us out of field goal range and it greatly impacted the game and possibly changed the outcome. Stoops said this himself in the post game briefing. Had there been a special teams coach, he would have known Swindle was out and would have had a replacement ready to go in on 4th down. A single play like that can be the difference in going to a bowl or going home.
good point...yes, the coach is ultimately responsible but a player should know they're next man up. The entire offense was so dysfunctional last year which results in poor play. If anything, the offense should be much more organized and guys will be held accountable. A more effective offense will be the ultimate result.The back up should of known. We had kids in high school that were capable of realizing the guy ahead of them was injured and they went to the coach and had their helmet. Player accountability was low last year and stoops also acknowledged that.