Tadarrius Patterson & Jaquan Henderson

JRowland

Hall of Famer
Staff member
May 29, 2001
35,719
257,590
113
Tadarrius Patterson is a linebacker from Alabama who just received an offer from Auburn.

I kept this off the record at the time, but on August 8 he told me that he would be verbally committing to Kentucky. Nothing came of it after that. He will likely end up at Auburn or another top SEC program.

Similarly, Jaquan Henderson told me on July 16 that he would be committing to Kentucky. He visited. The commitment never happened. He subsequently committed to UCLA.

Kentucky could have had commitments from both of these players. But herein lies the difficulty in recruiting in the South at Kentucky. For whatever reason -- and I don't know the reason in those cases -- calculations were made that commitments should not have been accepted.

Sometimes you put a kid on hold because you haven't had a chance to evaluate them thoroughly enough. Sometimes, maybe, if you're Kentucky, you have to balance taking a commitment from a kid you love, or not taking the commitment because (for whatever reason) you don't think you'll be able to keep him (based on something the kid has said, something you've learned about the kid, etc).

Anyways, recruiting at Kentucky is not easy and that makes the job Mark Stoops and staff have done all the more impressive. Two cases outlined above illustrate the complexities and the "what ifs" that are literally endless, with many never reaching the public eye.
 

Mr Schwump

Heisman
Nov 4, 2006
29,563
23,097
18
Tadarrius Patterson is a linebacker from Alabama who just received an offer from Auburn.

I kept this off the record at the time, but on August 8 he told me that he would be verbally committing to Kentucky. Nothing came of it after that. He will likely end up at Auburn or another top SEC program.

Similarly, Jaquan Henderson told me on July 16 that he would be committing to Kentucky. He visited. The commitment never happened. He subsequently committed to UCLA.

Kentucky could have had commitments from both of these players. But herein lies the difficulty in recruiting in the South at Kentucky. For whatever reason -- and I don't know the reason in those cases -- calculations were made that commitments should not have been accepted.

Sometimes you put a kid on hold because you haven't had a chance to evaluate them thoroughly enough. Sometimes, maybe, if you're Kentucky, you have to balance taking a commitment from a kid you love, or not taking the commitment because (for whatever reason) you don't think you'll be able to keep him (based on something the kid has said, something you've learned about the kid, etc).

Anyways, recruiting at Kentucky is not easy and that makes the job Mark Stoops and staff have done all the more impressive. Two cases outlined above illustrate the complexities and the "what ifs" that are literally endless, with many never reaching the public eye.

Winning can alter this. Southern kids are well aware, or will soon be aware if being recruited widely, of UK's humiliating, embarrassing losing streaks. 30 years or whatever to UF, 29 of 30 or whatever to UT, 7 to Miss St, 5 to UL, whatever it is to UGA but more importantly there UK's not been competitive vs UGA for several years, hell...4 out of 5 to Vandy. UK has GOT to end this crap and start winning games. Do that and they have a much better chance of holding onto these types.

I've said it for years, UK is in a classic Catch-22. Have to have good players to win, have to win to get good players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: akaukswoosh

*Bleedingblue*

Heisman
Mar 5, 2009
39,523
30,308
113
Not upset over Patterson but Henderson looks to be a nice player. I'm not upset that the staff didn't offer Patterson. I'm sure they would have taken Henderson though.