Takeaways from one helluva win!

Aug 13, 2002
3,221
268
0
I really enjoyed this one, despite very questionable officiating.
I thought so too; Buie got clobbered a few times and no call. But I think the missed calls were pretty evened out.

I will say that Verhoeven seemed quite mystified by each of his 5 fouls. I don’t think they goofed on any of those. If you’re mystified every time, maybe the problem isn’t the officials. Just a thought.
 

DaCat

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
25,506
1,900
113
I thought so too; Buie got clobbered a few times and no call. But I think the missed calls were pretty evened out.

I will say that Verhoeven seemed quite mystified by each of his 5 fouls. I don’t think they goofed on any of those. If you’re mystified every time, maybe the problem isn’t the officials. Just a thought.
The last call was bad. On the replay, there was almost no contact.
 

ricko6543211

Junior
Nov 15, 2006
4,222
207
47
Great article. Heck of a job by the Cats. I stayed up until 1:40am in foggy London town and they did not disappoint. We just made one more play / a couple more FTs than they did. As you pointed out it’s a lovely change of pace from some of the prior years when we so often seemed to fall one key play or one big shot short. Boo gets a lot of criticism including sometimes from me but that’s a game we don’t win without him. Thanks Boo. This team just seems to feel and play and most importantly finish a bit differently. Lots of season left but this was a huge win.

Rest up (very briefly!), then on to Nebraska. GO CATS
 

Purple Pile Driver

All-Conference
May 14, 2014
27,132
2,569
113
Great article. Heck of a job by the Cats. I stayed up until 1:40am in foggy London town and they did not disappoint. We just made one more play / a couple more FTs than they did. As you pointed out it’s a lovely change of pace from some of the prior years when we so often seemed to fall one key play or one big shot short. Boo gets a lot of criticism including sometimes from me but that’s a game we don’t win without him. Thanks Boo. This team just seems to feel and play and most importantly finish a bit differently. Lots of season left but this was a huge win.

Rest up (very briefly!), then on to Nebraska. GO CATS
Boo was the difference. He was fired up. Directing traffic all night and he was getting on his teammates for mistakes. This was in a good way, and much different than we saw from last years team, including Boo. He took big shots and constantly penetrated to the paint. Great game.

Boo was not going to let us lose.
 

GatoLouco

Sophomore
Nov 13, 2019
5,636
116
63
Lots of complaining about the refs. And there was a fair amount to question. On our side though, Boo had a few calls that were very much on the limit of what is an offensive foul. Very clever use of a little push at the end of a drive to the basket.
 

ballerog711

Redshirt
Sep 23, 2022
898
0
0
Nice thing is last year (I think) against the same team, we lost this type of game. They got defensive stops this time and made free throws.
 

TheC

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
19,102
1,171
62
Lots of complaining about the refs. And there was a fair amount to question. On our side though, Boo had a few calls that were very much on the limit of what is an offensive foul. Very clever use of a little push at the end of a drive to the basket.
Three calls that pissed me off included when refs called that tiny little side bump on Berry even though it had no impact on the driving Wisconsin player, but then on a similar play when Boo drove to the basket and scored against Wahl, they didn't call the side bump contact. The third call was when Boo drove to the basket on Chucky Hepburn and the replay clearly showed Hepburn was not anywhere close to set or squared up too Boo and they called the offensive foul. That was outrageous. I'm sure there were others, but those three were at critical moments of the second half.
 

Hungry Jack

All-Conference
Nov 17, 2008
37,173
2,666
67
I thought our defensive prowess was on full display last night. There were a few lapses, but in general we made it very difficult for WI to get good shots.

The Badgers scored 8 in 2.5 minutes to open the second half, but only scored 1 (only thanks to Chase's dumb foul at 0:007) in the final 2.5 minutes.

If we hold teams to zero points over the final 2.5 minutes, I love our chances.
 

TheC

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
19,102
1,171
62
I thought our defensive prowess was on full display last night. There were a few lapses, but in general we made it very difficult for WI to get good shots.

The Badgers scored 8 in 2.5 minutes to open the second half, but only scored 1 (only thanks to Chase's dumb foul at 0:007) in the final 2.5 minutes.

If we hold teams to zero points over the final 2.5 minutes, I love our chances.
As much as we (I) complain about the double teams leading to wide open 3 pointers, I guess NU is betting that the other team can't keep making them all night. Eventually they will either cool off or get tired. As much as Wisky kept hanging around by hitting their threes, that shot eventually failed them down the stretch. As long as NU can score enough to hang with a team making their 3's, they have a shot at the end. It worked last night.
 

lunker35

Sophomore
Jan 1, 2010
5,678
164
62
Three calls that pissed me off included when refs called that tiny little side bump on Berry even though it had no impact on the driving Wisconsin player, but then on a similar play when Boo drove to the basket and scored against Wahl, they didn't call the side bump contact. The third call was when Boo drove to the basket on Chucky Hepburn and the replay clearly showed Hepburn was not anywhere close to set or squared up too Boo and they called the offensive foul. That was outrageous. I'm sure there were others, but those three were at critical moments of the second half.
The refs in our conference are horrid. I’ve said it for years and I’ll stand by it. They’re just awful and try way to hard to impact games.
 

phatcat_rivals223240

All-Conference
Nov 5, 2001
18,867
1,035
113
I thought so too; Buie got clobbered a few times and no call. But I think the missed calls were pretty evened out.

I will say that Verhoeven seemed quite mystified by each of his 5 fouls. I don’t think they goofed on any of those. If you’re mystified every time, maybe the problem isn’t the officials. Just a thought.
Verhoeven doesn't add a lot of value. One of those "more fouls than points" guys
 

HawkCat

Senior
May 29, 2001
8,092
494
83
He got him on the arm early, then much lighter later in the shot
That was my takeaway as well. Verhoeven hacked the guy hard about a second earlier and got away with it, then got called for the touch foul. He deserved a foul anyway. The endless complaining tends to draw more attention and fouls in the long run. We went through that with Nance for a while.
 

JournCat

Junior
Aug 4, 2009
4,512
242
63
As much as we (I) complain about the double teams leading to wide open 3 pointers, I guess NU is betting that the other team can't keep making them all night. Eventually they will either cool off or get tired. As much as Wisky kept hanging around by hitting their threes, that shot eventually failed them down the stretch. As long as NU can score enough to hang with a team making their 3's, they have a shot at the end. It worked last night.

I felt this was a companion to the Rutgers game, where we objectively played much better but got killed by a Cam Spencer hot streak. It seems right that we split those two.
 

PurpleFaze

Redshirt
Jan 9, 2019
1,331
38
48
I thought so too; Buie got clobbered a few times and no call. But I think the missed calls were pretty evened out.

I will say that Verhoeven seemed quite mystified by each of his 5 fouls. I don’t think they goofed on any of those. If you’re mystified every time, maybe the problem isn’t the officials. Just a thought.
A couple of them on him were clear like the time he tried to ride the wisky player out of bounds. At least one wasn’t a foul and one when they showed the replay should have been called on Berry
 

PurpleFaze

Redshirt
Jan 9, 2019
1,331
38
48
The refs in our conference are horrid. I’ve said it for years and I’ll stand by it. They’re just awful and try way to hard to impact games.
They need new emphasis and training from the conference. They should be told not to call marginal fouls especially those that have no real affect on the outcome of a play. In general they should be told to error on the side of no call versus the current call everything mode of officiating. The number of “phantom” calls last night was incredibly frustrating
 

TheC

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
19,102
1,171
62
They need new emphasis and training from the conference. They should be told not to call marginal fouls especially those that have no real affect on the outcome of a play. In general they should be told to error on the side of no call versus the current call everything mode of officiating. The number of “phantom” calls last night was incredibly frustrating
I have no doubt that officiating is an extremely difficult task. I'm no neuroscientist, but I imagine the neural circuitry involved in seeing something happen, processing it and then making the decision to blow the whistle or not can not really function entirely in the split second we expect them to act in. Although I know it would slow things down more, I would be in favor of more referee conferences where they quickly huddle after a call to discuss. You wouldn't need to do this on every whistle, but I think they could do it more often.
 
Dec 24, 2010
3,099
102
63
The refs were beyond frustrating last night and while I felt NU took the brunt of it, there was still plenty of stupid calls on WI as well, and plenty of no-calls on legit play changing fouls - again, on both sides.

It's a hard job and I certainly couldn't do it, but when both fan bases are booing the same calls over and over again, maybe stop and re-evaluate. I still can't get over that last whistle on Matt's rebound.
 

PurpleWhiteBoy

Redshirt
Feb 25, 2021
5,303
0
0
Nice article, Lou. Since you're sort of the "enthusiasm barometer" for the rest of us, I think it was worth mentioning that Max Klesmit missed the game for the Badgers... 30 minute a game guard for Wisconsin, plays good defense.
May have made a difference yesterday, but I think we did not play our best and still beat the Badgers.

Agree with you about Nick Martinelli - credit to him for coming in ice cold and not freezing up. Thats a good sign.
 

JoeWildcat

Sophomore
Jul 31, 2001
2,712
120
46
Verhoeven doesn't add a lot of value. One of those "more fouls than points" guys
Verhoeven is not a Power-six caliber player - not even close. But we need someone to give Matt a rest, and Verhoeven is about all we have. Beran can handle the role for a few minutes, but that is quite burden to put on him.
 

Titanium999

Redshirt
Jan 16, 2014
4,573
0
0
As much as we (I) complain about the double teams leading to wide open 3 pointers, I guess NU is betting that the other team can't keep making them all night. Eventually they will either cool off or get tired. As much as Wisky kept hanging around by hitting their threes, that shot eventually failed them down the stretch. As long as NU can score enough to hang with a team making their 3's, they have a shot at the end. It worked last night.
I was shocked they were making them earlier! We definitely 💯 had too much leg 🦵 speed for em!
 

xxxbobxxx

Sophomore
Mar 12, 2005
10,806
163
43
I thought our defensive prowess was on full display last night. There were a few lapses, but in general we made it very difficult for WI to get good shots.

The Badgers scored 8 in 2.5 minutes to open the second half, but only scored 1 (only thanks to Chase's dumb foul at 0:007) in the final 2.5 minutes.

If we hold teams to zero points over the final 2.5 minutes, I love our chances.
That’s it for me too. Closing out games is something we have not seen in awhile. And that’s what these guys are doing.

Really wish the snow was lining up tomorrow as I really want
 

hdhntr1

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2006
37,277
1,093
113
They need new emphasis and training from the conference. They should be told not to call marginal fouls especially those that have no real affect on the outcome of a play. In general they should be told to error on the side of no call versus the current call everything mode of officiating. The number of “phantom” calls last night was incredibly frustrating
The issue is that they tend to be inconsistent. Sometimes they call anything and sometimes they call nothing. Sometimes differential calling one one team than the other.
 
May 29, 2001
1,044
30
0
They need new emphasis and training from the conference. They should be told not to call marginal fouls especially those that have no real affect on the outcome of a play. In general they should be told to error on the side of no call versus the current call everything mode of officiating. The number of “phantom” calls last night was incredibly frustrating
College hoops officials, unlike football, don't work for one conference alone. Yes, each conference has a "supervisor" of officiating but they do little supervisory training as such. Any official we see working a Big 10 game will likely be on the roster of at least two other Div 1 conferences. If there's a "reporting" structure, it's with a supervising assignor who usually contracts with various conferences to provide officials (who are in turn independent contractors).

Think of it as a Venn diagram in which a single official fits into multiple overlaps. Not at all uncommon to find the same person calling games in as many as four different conferences in a given week. So it's hard to find much that would characterize B1G basketball officials from, say, Big 12, MAC, or Big East.

Not so in football, which is why in bowl games they can refer to an SEC crew, etc.