I think one very telling sign will be what CCC does next. If Nance is ready next game, does CCC keep playing him heavy in the 5 w Young as a backup in an uptempo style or put Nance at the 4 and slow it all down.
If no nance for awhile (and Williams probably misses at least one more) then CCC has more data and easy choice.
But let’s assume nance gets back next game. If CCC does not at least try to keep slow pace, start young and use nance mostly as a four, then he really needs to go. I’m not saying they will win or even do well. But we have lots of data of how high pace tempo w nance at five does. So intentionally, stubbornly, refusing to keep trying something that worked once would demonstrate more stubbornness than PF - and that’s a high bar and also a guy that should be on the hot seat as a result.
I would love to see CCC keep trying this new approach, pile up some wins and put some real interest in the B1G tourney. Beat MSU means every game is winnable. Do this and my faith in CCC is restored even if it came to pass from a forced decision resulting from an injury.
If no nance for awhile (and Williams probably misses at least one more) then CCC has more data and easy choice.
But let’s assume nance gets back next game. If CCC does not at least try to keep slow pace, start young and use nance mostly as a four, then he really needs to go. I’m not saying they will win or even do well. But we have lots of data of how high pace tempo w nance at five does. So intentionally, stubbornly, refusing to keep trying something that worked once would demonstrate more stubbornness than PF - and that’s a high bar and also a guy that should be on the hot seat as a result.
I would love to see CCC keep trying this new approach, pile up some wins and put some real interest in the B1G tourney. Beat MSU means every game is winnable. Do this and my faith in CCC is restored even if it came to pass from a forced decision resulting from an injury.