The earth is a flat, non spinning realm, not a planet in an infinite universe

Is the Earth Flat or a Globe


  • Total voters
    0
Status
Not open for further replies.

JDHoss

Well-known member
Jan 1, 2003
16,372
2,261
113
Since WilliamJ just confirmed Bill is a troll, will this thread die now?

I think we should keep it open. Use it for space/science related topics. Or maybe even far more plausible theories than flat earth, such as do vampires as we see them on television and the movies really exist, or are the British Royals lizard people (a question already posed by Ganner).
 

Tinker Dan

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2006
3,540
540
113
I'm still waiting for a physicist to tell me what gravity IS.
Here is a demonstrable way for you to understand gravity.

This is simple, but very important.

You really only need two things
  • A 16 lb bowling ball
  • An open mind
  1. Hold the bowling ball high over your head
  2. Close your eyes
  3. Wish really hard that someone can prove to you what gravity is
  4. Let go of the bowling ball.
You will understand very quickly what gravity is.

Oh by the way. You keep putting everything under fish eye lens.
I gave the example of RF wave propagation and the limitations of line of sight that VHF has, but the HF spectrum does not. You said many, many pages ago that you would "look into it."
Go ahead and say Fish Eye Lens and get it over with.

Then we can get back to the "myth" of gyros and navigation...... I am really waiting on your response to Schuler Oscillations and Schuler Tuning.
 
Last edited:

Catatonic75

New member
Feb 20, 2008
64
1
0
If Brushy is a troll... Bravo, good sir! Seriously. [cheers]

But this JRE podcast was posted a few pages ago and I just listened tonight. Brushy is every lunatic Mick West describes to a T. I recommend everyone listen to at least the first 30 mins.

I'll continue to read and post regardless because I like talking about space and science, and I've actually learned a thing or two, but we're never going to convince Brushy otherwise. His belief in a flat earth is confirmation bias based in religious fervor. For him to accept a round earth would mean for him to denounce his idea of God. And good luck doing that.

 

Brushy Bill

Well-known member
Mar 31, 2009
147,814
6,915
113
Here is a demonstrable way for you to understand gravity.

This is simple, but very important.

You really only need two things
  • A 16 lb bowling ball
  • An open mind
  1. Hold the bowling ball high over your head
  2. Close your eyes
  3. Wish really hard that someone can prove to you what gravity is
  4. Let go of the bowling ball.
You will understand very quickly what gravity is.

Oh by the way. You keep putting everything under fish eye lens.
I gave the example of RF wave propagation and the limitations of line of sight that VHF has, but the HF spectrum does not. You said many, many pages ago that you would "look into it."
Go ahead and say Fish Eye Lens and get it over with.

Then we can get back to the "myth" of gyros and navigation...... I am really waiting on your response to Schuler Oscillations and Schuler Tuning.

I don't care what you are waiting for anymore *******.
 

Catatonic75

New member
Feb 20, 2008
64
1
0
Because this guy is freaking me out, and he's using science to do it. If you watch his other videos you can see the physical toll that his conclusions, that we are not on a spinning ball and the earth is probably flat, takes on his body and mind. What's going on here. I'll take anything, proof the earth is a sphere, proof the earth is spinning, proof the earth is moving through space because I've been at this for a few weeks and I can't find anything definitive.
Going back and revisiting your first post and you asked for "...proof the earth is a sphere, proof the earth is spinning, proof the earth is moving through space because I've been at this for a few weeks and I can't find anything definitive" and after 53 pages now you have shrugged off every bit of facts we have presented--if not straight up ignored.

So, I ask you, what would constitute concrete evidence worthy of enough your approval? Just what specifically would you consider definitive proof?
 

IdaCat

Well-known member
May 8, 2004
68,809
1,290
113
It is irrelevant to the discussion, and you don't care what it is anyway, I know what game your trying to play here.

It certainly is relevant to the discussion. And I'm not playing games. Just trying to learn something REAL about you.
 

Catatonic75

New member
Feb 20, 2008
64
1
0
And I'm still waiting.

No, you tell us what you want as proof. And very specifically. You asked so you set the criteria for what you find as acceptable evidence.

Because the real answer is nothing. You accept nothing. You want to argue your side and your side alone.
 

Brushy Bill

Well-known member
Mar 31, 2009
147,814
6,915
113
You haven't given my any valid proof dipstick. Every piece that has been offered by your side has an alternative FE explanation or is irrelevant to the discussion.
 

Catatonic75

New member
Feb 20, 2008
64
1
0
MR. BRUSHY BILL. You deleted your post outlining the terms in which you were willing to concede. I saw it! Do you want to tell everyone what you said or shall I? #SHAME!
 

Catatonic75

New member
Feb 20, 2008
64
1
0
There is no LEO on the flat earth.
EXACTLY. So why can we all walk out of our homes and look up into the night sky and see an object exactly when and where it's supposed to be? This is not limited to the ISS but many, MANY, satellites. Exactly when and where. It's not magic I tell you that. And absolutely not possible in a flat earth scenario.
 
Last edited:

Brushy Bill

Well-known member
Mar 31, 2009
147,814
6,915
113
 
Status
Not open for further replies.