The Great Pacific Garbage Island Hoax

MdWIldcat55

Well-known member
Dec 9, 2007
20,844
5,818
113
http://www.slate.com/articles/healt...as_the_myth_we_needed_to_save_our_oceans.html

This is a fascinating article about how most environmental alarmism is intentionally exaggerated nonsense -- exaggerated by activists and spread by gullible and sympathetic journalists.

His example: The great "garbage island" in the Pacific. It was never more than random junk that floated into a vortex first noticed centuries ago. And you could sail right through the "island" and never see one piece of man-made material. But in the hands of committed environmental activists who pushed it on gullible and sensational pro-Green journalists who had never seen it with their own eyes, it eventually became a "continent-sized mountain" of debris.

What makes this piece fascinating is that it is written by an environmentalist who doesn't see this so much as dishonest as he does necessary. He's actively advocating for some invented 'symbol' to sell us on Global Warming (that is, climate change.)
 

Supreme Lord Z

New member
Jan 7, 2016
3,447
2,368
0
I agree with the OP. Pollution is a liberal hoax. The ocean is pristine. Man cannot damage anything God has created.
 
May 22, 2002
4,133
300
0
Two minutes on a Google search to see the tons of plastic and trash floating in oceans and washed up on beaches... Plastic takes anywhere from 50 to 500 years to degrade.
 

mdlUK.1

New member
Dec 23, 2002
29,712
3,216
0
According to Lurch Kerry, there will soon be more plastic than fish in the oceans.

 

Teachable Moe

New member
Mar 19, 2015
2,708
876
0
http://www.slate.com/articles/healt...as_the_myth_we_needed_to_save_our_oceans.html

This is a fascinating article about how most environmental alarmism is intentionally exaggerated nonsense -- exaggerated by activists and spread by gullible and sympathetic journalists.

His example: The great "garbage island" in the Pacific. It was never more than random junk that floated into a vortex first noticed centuries ago. And you could sail right through the "island" and never see one piece of man-made material. But in the hands of committed environmental activists who pushed it on gullible and sensational pro-Green journalists who had never seen it with their own eyes, it eventually became a "continent-sized mountain" of debris.

What makes this piece fascinating is that it is written by an environmentalist who doesn't see this so much as dishonest as he does necessary. He's actively advocating for some invented 'symbol' to sell us on Global Warming (that is, climate change.)

I've never seen any reference to a continent sized mountain of debris. I've always seen it referenced as the gyre of junk that it is. Story mutates in the telling. Film at 10.

Connecting it to AGW which is peer reviewed is just nonsense. You wouldn't be over-stating the significance of your evidence, would you?
 
Oct 21, 2005
462
96
0
If the plastic is congregating together, wouldn't be easy for Lurch and his buddies to just pick it up and recycle it? Nope, he just wants to complain about my plastic, btw, I have never thrown my plastic in the ocean.
 

mdlUK.1

New member
Dec 23, 2002
29,712
3,216
0
If the plastic is congregating together, wouldn't be easy for Lurch and his buddies to just pick it up and recycle it? Nope, he just wants to complain about my plastic, btw, I have never thrown my plastic in the ocean.
You beat me to it! If it's that big, shouldn't be that hard to remove.