The Greatest Tennis 🎾 Player of All Time?

bluthruandthru

Well-known member
Feb 24, 2009
3,812
3,923
113
Laver.

Lefty one hand backhand
200 titles
3 Australian, 2 French, 2 US Open, 4 Wimbledon
1st man to a million

 

funKYcat75

Well-known member
Apr 10, 2008
32,267
40,640
112
It’s a toss up. You could look at stats and each of them (Nadal, Federer, Djokovic) have a perfectly reasonable claim to the GOAT. It’s amazing that they are contemporaries.

Federer has never gone more than one season without a major title since 2003.
Nadal has beaten Federer on “his” court (Wimbledon) but Federer has not done the same to Nadal.
Djokovic has the edge head-to-head overall and in major matchups.

I could go on and on with stats like those.

If Djokovic goes another 5 years winning majors, then he will hold the title.

The answer, of course is ...
Serena
 

UK4number9

New member
Jun 25, 2020
3,653
2,349
0
Shoes, equipment, ect makes it impossible to compare players. Serena Williams is the obvious female choice. Male is too hard.
 

cawoodsct

Well-known member
Apr 27, 2006
39,730
27,642
102
It’s a toss up. You could look at stats and each of them (Nadal, Federer, Djokovic) have a perfectly reasonable claim to the GOAT. It’s amazing that they are contemporaries.

Federer has never gone more than one season without a major title since 2003.
Nadal has beaten Federer on “his” court (Wimbledon) but Federer has not done the same to Nadal.
Djokovic has the edge head-to-head overall and in major matchups.

I could go on and on with stats like those.

If Djokovic goes another 5 years winning majors, then he will hold the title.

The answer, of course is ...
Serena
Great answer. It’s very difficult.


I will say Aaron Krickstein is the best ever.
 

Glenn's Take

Well-known member
May 20, 2012
12,465
14,642
113
If you believe that sexist reporter that somehow got John McEnroe in trouble a few years back it's Serena. Sexist being the key word.
 

UKRuppster

New member
Apr 14, 2018
2,111
2,090
0
Iga Swiatek, the reigning French Open champ is my G.O.A.T. since I'm Polish-American 😁

But seriously, any of the current 'Big 3' on the men's side are good answers as is Serena on the ladies side. One more I offer for the ladies side is Margaret Court with 24 Grand Slams, which is the most of anybody male or female. Serena's still yet to catch her.

Also on the ladies side, I think Monica Seles would have been up there if not for the crazy Steffi Graf fan stabbing her with a knife. That's an unfortunate case of what might have been, one of many in sports...
 

Drcats2025

Active member
Nov 13, 2012
7,928
15,699
63
Federer, Djokovic, Nadal, Sampras. In that order. Best female ever was Steffi Graf.
 

Deeeefense

Well-known member
Staff member
Aug 22, 2001
43,685
49,604
113
I play a bit of tennis myself and I can say that Roger is definitely the most mechanically perfect tennis player I have watched, I'm not sure if that makes him the GOAT, but no one I have ever watched plays the game as consistently well and at such an elite level. Everything he does on every stroke is picture perfect. A lot of coaches tell players to watch his film especially on his forehand and serve.

Being a doubles player though my favorite players are the Bryan Brothers, winningest double team ever. I've watch many hours of their film learning their techniques. Doubles is a much more complex game than singles, much more to learn, and more difficult though less physically demanding.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ABlockalypseBrow

ABlockalypseBrow

New member
May 26, 2018
1,534
3,183
0
I put Rafa as #1 but respect any opinion, including Don Budge.

To me Rafa’s prime fell between Roger and Novak so he had to carve out his 20 slams a bit more difficultly. But I think Novak will end up with the slam record in 2-3 years time if he has no major injuries.

It’s a toss up. You could look at stats and each of them (Nadal, Federer, Djokovic) have a perfectly reasonable claim to the GOAT. It’s amazing that they are contemporaries.

Federer has never gone more than one season without a major title since 2003.
Nadal has beaten Federer on “his” court (Wimbledon) but Federer has not done the same to Nadal.
Djokovic has the edge head-to-head overall and in major matchups.

I could go on and on with stats like those.

If Djokovic goes another 5 years winning majors, then he will hold the title.

The answer, of course is ...
Serena

Correction: Rafa leads the H2H in majors against both Roger (10-4) and Novak (10-6).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: chroix

Ahnan E. Muss

New member
Nov 13, 2003
2,934
3,001
0
Are Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic still dominating in their 30s because they're the three greatest of all time who just happened to all play at the same time? Or because the generation that followed them has been a complete and total bust for 10 years?
 

ABlockalypseBrow

New member
May 26, 2018
1,534
3,183
0
Are Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic still dominating in their 30s because they're the three greatest of all time who just happened to all play at the same time? Or because the generation that followed them has been a complete and total bust for 10 years?

Well I think if you look at the men’s game, the greatest talents of the open era kind of just gave up when or before they got old. Sampras had a bad back and iron deficiency, he was ready to go out. Agassi was always a bit of a mental chump, basically quit mid career. Borg left the game at 26 cause he lost a couple major finals. McEnroe took two 6 month sabbaticals in his prime and was never in great shape. Connors stuck around but was limited physically and played with a horrific racquet, and was a head case. Lendl stuck around but also was limited mentally as Chang showed (and his horrid finals record showed).

So really what you have is the old guys aren’t giving up like they used to. Keep in mind Federer, Nadal and Djokovic all won their first finals playing against first time slam finalists. What a blessing that was, to get that mental monkey off their back on the first try against relatively weak competition! These young guys usually have to go against these legends, sometimes back to back, to win their first slam.

I love what Novak said before the AO final this year: “I’m not going to stand here and hand it over to them. I’m going to make them work their *** off for that.”
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Deeeefense

ABlockalypseBrow

New member
May 26, 2018
1,534
3,183
0
He played until he was 36 and won a Slam right before he turned 33.

I’m talking about before that, when he had multiple slumps, partially because of injuries but also mentally dumb stuff like using crystal meth lol.

Perhaps I’m being a bit unfair to Andre, however Pete Sampras lived in his head rent free for a good 20 years, I think of that there’s no doubt.

I remember this idiotic quote from his book, as he was shaking Sampras hand at the net having lost the USO final, he claims to have been thinking: I may have lost, but I saw him give a bad tip the other night at the restaurant, so at least I’m not a horrible person!

I guess Andre was the original “champion of life”, Butch Jones would be proud.
 
Last edited:

gamecockcat

New member
Oct 29, 2004
10,524
13,500
0
Really good question.

Men:
Laver has to be mentioned as he won the GS twice in his career. Plus, had to sit out several (4?) years in the prime of his career because he wasn't allowed to play any GS as he was a professional. In fact, I think he won the GS the year before his exile was imposed and just a year or two after he was allowed to play in the GS events again. So, it's not out of the question to think he may have won another 8+ GS tournaments and be at the 20 or so level. With the changes in the equipment and style of play, hard to really compare with anyone in today's game but he was so dominant for such a long time, you have to include him in the conversation.

Federer, of course.
Nadal, of course.
Joker, of course.
Borg perhaps as he quit while still pretty young, 26, had already accumulated 11 GS titles (almost no one played the Australian back then for some reason) and surely could have won at least a few more if he'd played into his 30s. Throw in a few AO titles (if he'd chosen to play the tourney) and he'd be in the upper teens.
Sampras maybe - never won the French but owned Wimbledon and US Open.

Female:
Serena, obviously.
Martina - maybe even more dominant in her prime than Serena.
Steffi, obviously.
Margaret Court, obviously.

My picks: Federer by a hair over, in order, Laver, Joker and Nadal (I'd put him last just because the majority of his GS wins are on one surface on which he's the GOAT).
Serena just a hair over Martina.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kyeric