This works on multiple levels

Brushy Bill

Hall of Famer
Mar 31, 2009
61,153
129,069
113
 

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
191
0
That's a pledge based on assumptions that no longer apply. Funny how the D's have tried for decades to remove the second part of that statement from our ethos.

That's your opinion. Again, if you don't like where you live and how it's going, move to ____________(insert nation).
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,230
3,298
113
That's your opinion. Again, if you don't like where you live and how it's going, move to ____________(insert nation).
No, fight to the death for what you hold sacred. Eradicate the threats to your ideals. That’s a much much better option.
 

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
191
0
Or you can change it and make you leave.

Ahh...yeah...says the people that are threatened by what they call "end of free speech" are now wanting to remove people from their private homes. Can't make this **** up. :joy: :joy: :joy: :joy:

Dave, you would last about 15 seconds once you step on my front steps.

EDIT: Which is about the time you last with your boyfriend.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,599
814
113
Ahh...yeah...says the people that are threatened by what they call "end of free speech" are now wanting to remove people from their private homes. Can't make this **** up. :joy: :joy: :joy: :joy:

Dave, you would last about 15 seconds once you step on my front steps.

EDIT: Which is about the time you last with your boyfriend.
I wouldnt make it to your steps. I would firebomb your house and shoot people as they come out.
 

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
191
0
I wouldnt make it to your steps. I would firebomb your house and shoot people as they come out.

Sure you would. I'd bet you are about as smart as these idiots that decided to riot and had their faces clear for identification to take place.

EDIT: And let me add, you ran like a ***** when confronted before.
 

indyrockstar

All-Conference
Dec 1, 2003
37,407
1,542
113
Sausage party..
Sure you would. I'd bet you are about as smart as these idiots that decided to riot and had their faces clear for identification to take place.

EDIT: And let me add, you ran like a ***** when confronted before.

Agreed, Dave is a *****...
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,230
3,298
113
Remember, those who fire the first shots are considered the terrorists or the violators. 🇺🇲
It’s a matter of perspective and victory on when the first shots are fired. Fort Sumter, Franz Ferdinand, Pearl Harbor, Poland, Boston, North Carolina, Nassau, etc.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,599
814
113
Sure you would. I'd bet you are about as smart as these idiots that decided to riot and had their faces clear for identification to take place.

EDIT: And let me add, you ran like a ***** when confronted before.
When did I run when confronted? It is amazing the stupid **** you idiots believe.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,599
814
113
Funny that Trumpers rail on safe spaces yet they need Gag and Parler.
Its funny that someone who loves to act like they are some kind of intellectual makes a comment so dense that everyone is laughing at your obvious stupidity.
 

NYC_Eer

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2010
10,631
48
0
My understanding is that Parler is for anyone, it merely doesnt censor user's speech.
OK. It’s well known as a far right wing haven...the people that need “free speech”, because they say racist and illegal ****. But believe whatever you like.
 

Darth_VadEER

All-Conference
Dec 14, 2010
23,025
3,212
0
OK. It’s well known as a far right wing haven...the people that need “free speech”, because they say racist and illegal ****. But believe whatever you like.

I've never visited. I try not to contribute to those places.

I think it's odd you feel necessary to put Free Speech in quotations...like you think its imaginary.

You think words should be illegal. I do not. I think some words and speech are wrong and socially unacceptable but I would never take it to the extreme that you do and outlaw opinions.

Criminalizing thoughts is incredibly dangerous. I do not understand how you support that type of behavior.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,599
814
113
OK. It’s well known as a far right wing haven...the people that need “free speech”, because they say racist and illegal ****. But believe whatever you like.
You are clueless.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,599
814
113
The list of words and combination of words that can be considered to be illegal is incredibly small.

Everything else is just subjective.
My thoughts as well. It is interesting that NYC is suggesting people need to find free speech because what they say is racist or illegal. Why would anyone care where others choose to communicate to the point they label them? The problem is some folks wantall speech to be controlled and if people choose a forum not controlled by their people it must be because it is illegal or racist.

The reason 10s of millions have moved to Parler is because they can communicate and not be censored for saying things the controlled opposition has deemed improper.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,569
6,151
113
My thoughts as well. It is interesting that NYC is suggesting people need to find free speech because what they say is racist or illegal. Why would anyone care where others choose to communicate to the point they label them? The problem is some folks wantall speech to be controlled and if people choose a forum not controlled by their people it must be because it is illegal or racist.

The reason 10s of millions have moved to Parler is because they can communicate and not be censored for saying things the controlled opposition has deemed improper.

Why does anyone who didn't like what Conservatives said on Twitter have any problem with them expressing themselves on Parler? I don't think anyone of the folks who approve of censorship can explain that. The irony is they won't stop free speech, and at the end of the day they will be the ones who are censored.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,599
814
113
Why does anyone who didn't like what Conservatives said on Twitter have any problem with them expressing themselves on Parler? I don't think anyone of the folks who approve of censorship can explain that. The irony is they won't stop free speech, and at the end of the day they will be the ones who are censored.
The have to label the speech on Parler because they can censor/control it.