Transparency?

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,337
5,875
113
"Circle back" Psaki always claims the creepy administration is sworn to "openness" and "transparency" except when it comes to a report critical of the dominion voting machines used in the last election to rig votes for creepy Joe Biden. Wouldn't 'ya know they are refusing to allow release of a report on how those machines may have been tampered with, the exact claim made by observers who are skeptical of the "record" numbers of Biden votes received following a sudden suspension of all vote counts where those machines were operating?

We're told to believe this election was the "most secure in history" but the White House doesn't feel it was "secure" enough to allow a report on those voting machines to be released to the public.

Why not?

excerpt:
The report discusses “potential vulnerabilities in Dominion ImageCast X ballot marking devices,” or electronic voting devices, according to the government.

While CISA supports public disclosure of any vulnerabilities and associated mitigation measures with election equipment, allowing the release of the report at this point “increases the risk that malicious actors may be able to exploit any vulnerabilities and threaten election security,” government lawyers said in a Feb. 10 filing in the case.

What bohunk! Release the damn report and let's just see how "secure" those machines were? While you're at it, maybe an as yet to be offered explanation as to why all those vote counts were suddenly suspended while Biden was losing, yet he won almost all of the votes counted after the suspended vote counting resumed?

Hey, I don't have to explain how we cheated...that's none of your business anyway!
 
Last edited:

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,337
5,875
113
I'm posting this is in full because so many of our OT Leftists "in denial" won't even bother to click on that link I provided. (you don't want your Pyrrhic victory ruined)

Biden Administration Urges Court Not to Allow Release of ‘Secret Report’ on Dominion Voting Machines​

By Zachary Zeiber, Epoch Times, February 13, 2022:

Top officials at a U.S. federal cybersecurity agency are urging a judge not to authorize at this time the release of a report that analyzes Dominion Voting Systems equipment in Georgia, arguing doing so could assist hackers trying to “undermine election security.”

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) was recently provided an unredacted copy of the report, which was prepared by J. Alex Halderman, director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society.

The report discusses “potential vulnerabilities in Dominion ImageCast X ballot marking devices,” or electronic voting devices, according to the government.

While CISA supports public disclosure of any vulnerabilities and associated mitigation measures with election equipment, allowing the release of the report at this point “increases the risk that malicious actors may be able to exploit any vulnerabilities and threaten election security,” government lawyers said in a Feb. 10 filing in the case.

The case was brought in 2017 by good-government groups and voters who say the lack of paper ballots undermines the voting process.

U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg, an Obama nominee overseeing the case, was urged by CISA to reject attempts to release a redacted version of Halderman’s report for now.

CISA officials want to review the information in the report and help Dominion resolve the vulnerabilities identified before the report is released. They said they weren’t able to provide a date by which they’ll be finished.

Totenberg must weigh the request against the wishes of Georgia Secretary State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican and one of the defendants, who called in late January for the release to happen immediately.

John Poulos, Dominion’s CEO and president, said in a statement released by Raffensperger’s office that Halderman’s review lacked “a holistic approach,” adding that Dominion “supports all efforts to bring real facts and evidence forward to defend the integrity of our machines and the credibility of Georgia’s elections.”

Plaintiffs, including the Coalition for Good Governance, also support the release of the report, David Cross, one of their lawyers, confirmed to The Epoch Times.

The plaintiffs said in a filing before a copy was sent to CISA that the agency should get a copy and begin its evaluation process, but that the evaluation “should not unreasonably delay the public disclosure of the report, which must be promptly disclosed to Georgia state and county election officials, and filed on the public docket, so that public officials can secure the upcoming May primary elections.”

They asked Totenberg to order them to file a redacted version of the report on the docket, which would make it accessible to the public, no later than March 4.
 
Last edited:

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,337
5,875
113
Sure, you can believe this White House when they tell you a report on our military ineptness concerning Afghanistan never existed because it actually did exist!

Transparency don't 'ya know? :rolleyes:


excerpt:
The Post report said that the analysis concluded that “indecisiveness among Biden administration officials and initial reluctance to shutter the embassy in Kabul sowed chaos and put the overall mission at ‘increased risk.’”

On Friday, White House press secretary Jen Psaki rejected questions about the report by saying “there was no ‘after-action report’’ and the Biden administration had put months into planning the departure of Americans from Afghanistan.

Translation: She lied
 

roadtrasheer

All-Conference
Sep 9, 2016
18,193
2,264
113
Sure, you can believe this White House when they tell you a report on our military ineptness concerning Afghanistan never existed because it actually did exist!

Transparency don't 'ya know? :rolleyes:


excerpt:
The Post report said that the analysis concluded that “indecisiveness among Biden administration officials and initial reluctance to shutter the embassy in Kabul sowed chaos and put the overall mission at ‘increased risk.’”

On Friday, White House press secretary Jen Psaki rejected questions about the report by saying “there was no ‘after-action report’’ and the Biden administration had put months into planning the departure of Americans from Afghanistan.

Translation: She lied
If it took them months to mess up that bad , imagine what a cluster **** it would be in a emergency....oh wow
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,337
5,875
113
If it took them months to mess up that bad , imagine what a cluster **** it would be in a emergency....oh wow

Even if what she says is true (that they planned for months our departure) how much worse that clusterf**k was anyway? She tried to just blow it all off instead of admitting they simply f***ed up royally!

She was just trying to be "transparent" don't 'ya know? 😕
 

Shirley Knott

Redshirt
May 26, 2017
12,831
0
0
Sure, you can believe this White House when they tell you a report on our military ineptness concerning Afghanistan never existed because it actually did exist!

Transparency don't 'ya know? :rolleyes:


excerpt:
The Post report said that the analysis concluded that “indecisiveness among Biden administration officials and initial reluctance to shutter the embassy in Kabul sowed chaos and put the overall mission at ‘increased risk.’”

On Friday, White House press secretary Jen Psaki rejected questions about the report by saying “there was no ‘after-action report’’ and the Biden administration had put months into planning the departure of Americans from Afghanistan.

Translation: She lied
How to determine when libs lie. They breathe between lies.....They gasp after big lies...
 

roadtrasheer

All-Conference
Sep 9, 2016
18,193
2,264
113
How to determine when libs lie. They breathe between lies.....They gasp after big lies...
Not libs . Democrats!
Call the enemy by name , not one of the dirty bastards running under a liberal or leftist party.
Their funding comes from the dnc ..controlled by the DSA. The old school Democrats are gone except 1 or 2 the rest would suck Castro's dead wiener
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,337
5,875
113
One of our OT posters was recently on here complaining about "sensationalized" headlines on the part of one particular poster the Left loathes who was passing along information about the Covid scam. Today there are NO "sensationalized" headlines from the main stream media on what is likely the biggest political scandal in history. A duly elected President being spied on by his major political opposition.

Wasn't another President impeached over something similar in a scandal called Watergate? Not only are there no "sensationalized" headlines over this outrageous scandal, there aren't even any reports on it from the propaganda machine aka: main stream media!

Know who else is curiously silent over this lack of "sensationalized" reporting and/or headlines?

@MountaineerWV :rolleyes: