That's why i laugh at them and the media for giving him all this credit without really paying attention to the actual teams . Yeah they are improved on the field but heck he is what the longest tenured coach in the SEC. So yell they should have better play on the field. As Florida and Tenn as you stated have been in flux over the years . And Napier gonna have them rolling sooner rather than later.Mark Stoops is 66-59 at UK. I'm as surprised as you that he's over .500.
He's 32-50 in the SEC and has produced TWO winning conference seasons in 10 years.
Team by team conference record.
Florida - 3-7
South Carolina - 7-3
Missouri - 7-3
Vanderbilt - 8-2
Tennessee - 2-8
Georgia - 0-10
Mississippi State - 4-6
Ole Miss - 0-3
Alabama - 0-3
LSU - 1-1
Auburn 0-1
Arkansas - 1-0
Texas A&M - 0-1
Louisville - 5-4
Non Conference History
Western Kentucky
Miami of Ohio
Alabama State
UT Martin - Twice
Ohio University
Louisiana Monroe
Louisiana Lafayette
EKU - Twice
Charlotte
Southern Miss – Twice
New Mexico State - Twice
Austin Peay
Eastern Michigan
Central Michigan
Murray State
Middle Tennessee State
Toledo
Eastern Michigan
Louisiana Monroe
Chattanooga
Miami of Ohio
Youngstown State
Northern Illinois
He’s 25-2 in these games.
He's 8-23 vs ranked teams.
He's 16-30 in road games.
Now you could probably do this with any coach. But if you're keeping track at home this means that if you do the math 33 - exactly 50% of his total wins come from non-conference cupcakes and Vanderbilt. The only program in the SEC worse than them. Even if you consider that UT and UF have been as they've ever been during his entire tenure - his record is still 5-15 against them. He has built his ENTIRE career at UK on:
- Louisville being in constant rebuilding mode
- Always scheduling 3 guaranteed wins in the non-conference.
- Going 4-0 in the non-conference
- Beating Vandy, Missouri and South Carolina every year.
47 of his 66 career wins are against cake non-conference teams, Vanderbilt, Missouri and South Carolina. Against that group of teams he's 47-10. Against everyone else he's 19-49
There is absolutely no denying that Mark Stoops has changed the perception of UK football. For whatever reason Barnhart has given him a blank check and they've invested millions into the program and staff over the last decade. Stoops embraced the "win at all cost" SEC mentality and brought on kids tossed out of other programs, dismissed run ins with the law and generally has done whatever it took to get talent on the field. UK football is in a place its never been. But.....the perception that the fans and a lot of the media have is that Stoops is a miracle worker and an amazing coach.That's why i laugh at them and the media for giving him all this credit without really paying attention to the actual teams . Yeah they are improved on the field but heck he is what the longest tenured coach in the SEC. So yell they should have better play on the field. As Florida and Tenn as you stated have been in flux over the years . And Napier gonna have them rolling sooner rather than later.
Ba-dee, ba-dee, ba-dee, That's All Folks!A Porky Pig statue? Salute to Warner Bros.?
Dont forget that one bad call away from losing to EKU who they beat in OT........EKYCard for a historical bottom-feeder like UK, defeating the likes of Vandy, South Carolina, and Louisville is significant to their fans.
*UK lost five straight games to Vandy between 1991 and 1995.
*UK lost 10 straight to South Carolina between 2000 and 2009.
*UK lost 7 out of 8 games to Louisville between 1999 and 2006.
This is also a program that has suffered embarrassing losses in Lexington, including Louisiana-Monroe in 1994 and Ohio in 2004. In 2012, one year before Stoops arrived, Vandy rolled into Lexington and thumped UK 40-0. And let's not forget that Western Kentucky defeated UK in back-to-back seasons.
Yes, the rest of the college football world makes a half-hearted golf clap in recognition of Stoops' winning streaks or winning record against UL, Vandy, and SC. However, if you're a UK fan who has endured decades of lackluster football, you'd likely be happy to have success against ANY program
Dude you just came here and threw a rock at a hornets nest. Best of luck to whatever comes your way.I will be the first UK fan to admit that our record against the SEC as a whole is not very good. With that said, when Mark stoops took over UK, the facilities were terrible and it was very hard to recruit to UK as UK is the most northern school in the SEC.
To say Kentucky has not made made big strides under Stoops leadership in the last five years would be untrue.
Lastly, Kentucky has owned U Of L in football by winning five of the last six. UK has dominated U Of L in the last four years with a margin of victory of about 30 points per game. If U Of L is mocking, UK, over the last five years, they are also marking their own program. I hope both teams have a good season and we have a hard played very competitive game come November. Best of luck to U Of L with Brohm as your new coach.
Investment in your football program has had little to do with Stupes. Your school simply cashes huge checks from the SEC, not unlike U of L is doing at the moment WRT the ACC.I will be the first UK fan to admit that our record against the SEC as a whole is not very good. With that said, when Mark stoops took over UK, the facilities were terrible and it was very hard to recruit to UK as UK is the most northern school in the SEC.
To say Kentucky has not made made big strides under Stoops leadership in the last five years would be untrue.
Lastly, Kentucky has owned U Of L in football by winning five of the last six. UK has dominated U Of L in the last four years with a margin of victory of about 30 points per game. If U Of L is mocking, UK, over the last five years, they are also marking their own program. I hope both teams have a good season and we have a hard played very competitive game come November. Best of luck to U Of L with Brohm as your new coach.
Amen!Investment in your football program has had little to do with Stupes. Your school simply cashes huge checks from the SEC, not unlike U of L is doing at the moment WRT the ACC.
If you want to convince me otherwise, what was your football revenue ex-SEC when Stupes took the job, and what is it now? Then I’ll net off his salary then and now.
Your success against U of L has not coincidentally come at the same time clowns have been in charge of U of L athletics. If Brohm can swim against this current, we’ll see how the next few years in this series go…
A movement from bottom dweller to 3rd from the bottom isn’t something to write home about. Let alone have a statue.I will be the first UK fan to admit that our record against the SEC as a whole is not very good. With that said, when Mark stoops took over UK, the facilities were terrible and it was very hard to recruit to UK as UK is the most northern school in the SEC.
To say Kentucky has not made made big strides under Stoops leadership in the last five years would be untrue.
Lastly, Kentucky has owned U Of L in football by winning five of the last six. UK has dominated U Of L in the last four years with a margin of victory of about 30 points per game. If U Of L is mocking, UK, over the last five years, they are also marking their own program. I hope both teams have a good season and we have a hard played very competitive game come November. Best of luck to U Of L with Brohm as your new coach.
I’m gonna say you spend a little too much time watching those clowns lolStoops has made UK into an average team, nothing more, nothing less. They have won more bowls through luck and a little officiating help then any team imaginable.
Penn St, PSU scores all of its points in the last quarter after its QB wakes up from a 3 quarter slumber and UK hold on to win.
Virginia Tech, Tech was driving to ice the game with a couple of minutes left and an obvious pi wasn’t called on UK allowing them to get the ball back and win on the last play.
IOWA, Iowa had 2 drives to make 1 first down that would have iced the game but couldn’t convert on either.
NC St, don’t remember the specifics but that game went down to the wire.
Bottom line, UK’s bowl performance isn’t all that great imo. The win against Penn St was good even though it seemed like the PSU QB was on the take. The other wins are against teams Louisville has beaten with weak coaching. Patrino 2.0 and Satterfield are responsible for making UK look like a top 10 team with their poor game preparation and execution.
Mostly just their bowl games.I’m gonna say you spend a little too much time watching those clowns lol