UK/JMI go after KSR

RoyKent

Heisman
Feb 3, 2015
22,565
31,991
66
Pretty pathetic and weak move by UK, Mitch and JMI. really disgraceful on their part. Like them or not, KSR is the #1 UK supporter/promoter/connector for UK sports. UKAA continues to show they are completely clueless when it comes to fan engagement and how to treat the regular fans.



 

Kats23

All-American
Nov 21, 2007
8,683
5,913
63
Could this be Cal pushing this ?
Far be it for me to point out a hissy by Matt Jones and he be wrong but it’s likely some corporate decision at the JMI level, not UK (Mitch, Cal or anybody else) plus, while Matt is philosophically correct in saying this is stupid by UK and JMI, from a business standpoint it’s absolutely the correct call. Let’s say they let KSR slide on this but stop Buffalo Wild Wings or some other local restaurant. Those restaurants would have a legitimate gripe. JMI spent a lot of money to own the UK name, to distribute it as they see fit. Is it right, that people like Matt Jones are able to profit off the use just because he’s simultaneously promoting it at the same time? UK or JMI makes no profit share off the promotion at KSRbar.

I also can’t believe the lawyer in Matt doesn’t see the liability issue here. Let’s say someone comes to one of his promoted UK games at KSR bar. Gets drunk, drive and smacks into and injures a person. Later comes out they went to KSR bar for the game. KSR bar is using licensed UK logos to promote it. Guy wouldn’t have gone there without those promotions...UK could be lumped into an injury lawsuit.

there’s a lot of reasons why UK doe
 

TortElvisII

Heisman
May 7, 2010
51,701
96,948
66


Matt Jones atop KSBar car when Mitch saw him.
 
Last edited:

colonelcat78

Senior
Oct 9, 2009
547
900
91
Far be it for me to point out a hissy by Matt Jones and he be wrong but it’s likely some corporate decision at the JMI level, not UK (Mitch, Cal or anybody else) plus, while Matt is philosophically correct in saying this is stupid by UK and JMI, from a business standpoint it’s absolutely the correct call. Let’s say they let KSR slide on this but stop Buffalo Wild Wings or some other local restaurant. Those restaurants would have a legitimate gripe. JMI spent a lot of money to own the UK name, to distribute it as they see fit. Is it right, that people like Matt Jones are able to profit off the use just because he’s simultaneously promoting it at the same time? UK or JMI makes no profit share off the promotion at KSRbar.

I also can’t believe the lawyer in Matt doesn’t see the liability issue here. Let’s say someone comes to one of his promoted UK games at KSR bar. Gets drunk, drive and smacks into and injures a person. Later comes out they went to KSR bar for the game. KSR bar is using licensed UK logos to promote it. Guy wouldn’t have gone there without those promotions...UK could be lumped into an injury lawsuit.

there’s a lot of reasons why UK doe


Amen...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spica Orbit

-COUNTRY-CLUB-JOE-

All-Conference
Jan 25, 2016
2,216
1,342
0
Far be it for me to point out a hissy by Matt Jones and he be wrong but it’s likely some corporate decision at the JMI level, not UK (Mitch, Cal or anybody else) plus, while Matt is philosophically correct in saying this is stupid by UK and JMI, from a business standpoint it’s absolutely the correct call. Let’s say they let KSR slide on this but stop Buffalo Wild Wings or some other local restaurant. Those restaurants would have a legitimate gripe. JMI spent a lot of money to own the UK name, to distribute it as they see fit. Is it right, that people like Matt Jones are able to profit off the use just because he’s simultaneously promoting it at the same time? UK or JMI makes no profit share off the promotion at KSRbar.

I also can’t believe the lawyer in Matt doesn’t see the liability issue here. Let’s say someone comes to one of his promoted UK games at KSR bar. Gets drunk, drive and smacks into and injures a person. Later comes out they went to KSR bar for the game. KSR bar is using licensed UK logos to promote it. Guy wouldn’t have gone there without those promotions...UK could be lumped into an injury lawsuit.

there’s a lot of reasons why UK doe

Nice try, JMI
 

ConRay9

All-American
Nov 15, 2017
3,199
6,711
0
Far be it for me to point out a hissy by Matt Jones and he be wrong but it’s likely some corporate decision at the JMI level, not UK (Mitch, Cal or anybody else) plus, while Matt is philosophically correct in saying this is stupid by UK and JMI, from a business standpoint it’s absolutely the correct call. Let’s say they let KSR slide on this but stop Buffalo Wild Wings or some other local restaurant. Those restaurants would have a legitimate gripe. JMI spent a lot of money to own the UK name, to distribute it as they see fit. Is it right, that people like Matt Jones are able to profit off the use just because he’s simultaneously promoting it at the same time? UK or JMI makes no profit share off the promotion at KSRbar.

I also can’t believe the lawyer in Matt doesn’t see the liability issue here. Let’s say someone comes to one of his promoted UK games at KSR bar. Gets drunk, drive and smacks into and injures a person. Later comes out they went to KSR bar for the game. KSR bar is using licensed UK logos to promote it. Guy wouldn’t have gone there without those promotions...UK could be lumped into an injury lawsuit.

there’s a lot of reasons why UK doe

Let me preface this by stating I am absolutely NOT saying you’re wrong, because UK/JMI are completely within their legal right to control their IP the way they see fit. However, what will happen is KSR and anyone else will just use alternate logos in promoting deals at their restaurant. I don’t think the official logo is enticing anyone to pick one restaurant over another.

Ultimately, it seems what they are doing is antagonizing one of the biggest promoters of UK athletics under the veil of legal IP claims. No one’s gonna care about that and instead hyper focus on the circumstances surrounding this sudden decision to send a cease and desist to KSR. If they really cared, they would have done this a LONG time ago. All that will happen is speculation by fans and media that will almost certainly trend poorly for UK/JMI.

I have next to zero real world legal experience at the moment, but I’m also extremely skeptical that the hypo you gave would actually result in any liability claim against UK that wouldn’t be frivolous in that scenario. However, I concede I don’t know enough to truly know atm.

So at the end of the day this seems like nothing but a bad look for JMI and, by extension, UK. At the VERY least this looks petty as hell.
 
Last edited:

SmedMoley

All-American
Nov 14, 2020
3,690
7,959
0
Couldn't Senator McGrath maybe step in and help Matt....oh wait.
Seems Matt only likes to follow rules that are to his benefit.
Him crying on Twitter about it is so sweet. Suck it up buttercup.
I'm not sure why he's even complaining. As a lawyer, he should know that unauthorized use a registered trademark is expressly forbidden. It's as cut and dried as you can get. He should have gotten proper authorization to use it.
 

fastpaste101

All-Conference
Feb 10, 2021
1,051
1,421
0
Uk is pretty strict about usages of thier likeness. Not sure why KSR should get a pass to use it without permission.
 
  • Like
Reactions: *CatinIL*

TankedCat

Heisman
Nov 8, 2006
22,792
21,499
0
interesting to note, and I could be wrong on this but....

didn't KSR sell their website to Barstool Sports?

and after that happened, I think you noticed a definite change in tone as it comes to support for Cal.

Stories from writers imploring Cal to stop lying, questioning his coaching decisions, substitution patterns, his post game comments - I mean, basically everything I do here, but I didn't build my brand on being UK's lapdog, and launch a book writing, restaurant owning, radio show career from it, then sell out to an unbiased 3rd party.

My wife wishes I did, but none the less I did not.

So maybe UK is like screw you KSR, you used to suck up to us but now that you've got a little cash in your pocket, you call it like you see it, and we don't like it.

just my observation.
 
Last edited:

Blue Wildcat

Heisman
Oct 10, 2008
5,728
10,144
0
It’s trademarked-it’s their logo and they should force control over it. The lawyer should have known this even if the radio host, business owner wanted it to be overlooked..
 
  • Like
Reactions: kl40504_rivals

420grover

All-American
Mar 26, 2006
7,703
7,860
0
It doesn't take much difference to get by copyright laws with logos. It only needs a slight change and it's no longer the UK logo.


Edit: They should put a checkerboard in the middle instead of solid blue. Or they could use my avatar, the color fade and skewed edges are different enough for the laws.
 

irishcat1965

Heisman
Apr 22, 2012
19,940
41,445
113
interesting to note, and I could be wrong on this but....

didn't KSR sell their website to Barstool Sports?

and after that happened, I think you noticed a definite change in tone as it comes to support for Cal.

Stories from writers imploring Cal to stop lying, questioning his coaching decisions, substitution patterns, his post game commnets - I mean, basically everything I do here, but I didn't build my brand on being UK's lapdog, and launch a book writing, restaurant owning, radio show career from it, then sell out to a unbiased 3rd party.

My wife wishes I did, but none the less I did not.

So maybe UK is like screw you KSR, you used to suck up to us but now that you've got a little cash in your pocket, you call it like you see it, and we don't like it.

just my observation.
Probably closer to the truth. And the little I listen to the show clearly shows a striking difference in tone towards Cal. Jones made his money building a close relationship with UK. Now that he is tweaking their noses so to speak, UK is not tolerating any of it.
 

Kats23

All-American
Nov 21, 2007
8,683
5,913
63
Let me preface this by stating I am absolutely NOT saying you’re wrong, because UK/JMI are completely within their legal right to control their IP the way they see fit. However, what will happen is KSR and anyone else will just use alternate logos in promoting deals at their restaurant. I don’t think the official logo is enticing anyone to pick one restaurant over another.

So at the end of the day what they are doing is antagonizing one of the biggest promoters of UK athletics under the veil of legal IP claims. No one’s gonna care about that and instead hyper focus on the circumstances surrounding this sudden decision to send a cease and desist to KSR. If they really cared, they would have done this a LONG time ago. All that will happen is speculation by fans and media that will almost certainly trend poorly for UK/JMI.

I have next to zero real world legal experience at the moment, but I’m also extremely skeptical that the hypo you gave would actually result in any liability claim against UK that wouldn’t be frivolous in that scenario. However, I concede I don’t know enough to truly know atm.

So at the end of the day this seems like nothing but a bad look for JMI and, by extension, UK. At the VERY least this looks petty as hell.
Completely agree with everything you said. I just look at it through a corporate, no emotions eyeballs and I see JMI and UK’s stance. Like when the NFL years said business’s couldn’t promote Super Bowl watch parties using the term Super Bowl.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KMKAT and ConRay9
Nov 12, 2014
4,807
11,637
0
Let me preface this by stating I am absolutely NOT saying you’re wrong, because UK/JMI are completely within their legal right to control their IP the way they see fit. However, what will happen is KSR and anyone else will just use alternate logos in promoting deals at their restaurant. I don’t think the official logo is enticing anyone to pick one restaurant over another.

So at the end of the day what they are doing is antagonizing one of the biggest promoters of UK athletics under the veil of legal IP claims. No one’s gonna care about that and instead hyper focus on the circumstances surrounding this sudden decision to send a cease and desist to KSR. If they really cared, they would have done this a LONG time ago. All that will happen is speculation by fans and media that will almost certainly trend poorly for UK/JMI.

I have next to zero real world legal experience at the moment, but I’m also extremely skeptical that the hypo you gave would actually result in any liability claim against UK that wouldn’t be frivolous in that scenario. However, I concede I don’t know enough to truly know atm.

So at the end of the day this seems like nothing but a bad look for JMI and, by extension, UK. At the VERY least this looks petty as hell.
Well said.

I mean, copywrite law is there for a reason. But, this is really tone deaf to go after your single largest supporters for this. KSR gives more publicity and promotion of UK sports than anything UK could pay for themselves. It's really extremely petty by JMI/UK.
 

ConRay9

All-American
Nov 15, 2017
3,199
6,711
0
Completely agree with everything you said. I just look at it through a corporate, no emotions eyeballs and I see JMI and UK’s stance. Like when the NFL years said business’s couldn’t promote Super Bowl watch parties using the term Super Bowl.

Absolutely! And I think it’s important to look at it from both sides. I wouldn’t have as big an issue if they had issued a cease and desist upon KSBar opening. I might not have agreed with it per se (from a public image standpoint) but I concede it is their IP, and their lawyers/legal team assuredly know more than I do about it.

The timing seems suspect, though. I’d be interested to know if they gave any other business or anyone else a call as well.
 

TBCat

Heisman
Mar 30, 2007
14,317
10,332
0
I am not in the legal profession but I have been told this by many people that are. The way that IP property works in the courts is that you defend your IP against everyone or you effectively lose the right to enforce it against anyone. In other words if a charity is using Mickey Mouse to help feed the poor then Disney has to sue them as if they are a rival company improperly using it. They can't choose to let it go in some cases. That may be why UK is doing this. If KSR is improperly using UK's IP then UK's hands are tied. They have to take action no matter who it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kl40504_rivals

Kats23

All-American
Nov 21, 2007
8,683
5,913
63
Absolutely! And I think it’s important to look at it from both sides. I wouldn’t have as big an issue if they had issued a cease and desist upon KSBar opening. I might not have agreed with it per se (from a public image standpoint) but I concede it is their IP, and their lawyers/legal team assuredly know more than I do about it.

The timing seems suspect, though. I’d be interested to know if they gave any other business or anyone else a call as well.
Agreed...timing is pretty suspect or at the very least, not great. I do wonder what Jones thinks he’s going to accomplish by griping about it? It’s not like he’s going to switch gears and rebrand the restaurant. UK athletics is the only game in town and he’s built his career on it. I doubt at the end of the day anyone is going to care KSRbar has to use imitation UK signage in their promotions. It isn’t like people are going to stop going to KSRbar bc the official UK logo isn’t there. Full stop, I’m not a MJ fan but I get his complaints and think he should’ve kept his mouth shut about it and just complied
 
  • Like
Reactions: UK till Death