A school that has been sanctioned should sue the NCAA for damages.
NCAA is in bed with UNC and Duke. You sue the NCAA, it probably gets dismissed, and they come down on you twice as hard next time if you slip up.
If you really are putting Duke and UNC in the same category, you truly have no concept of what happened here.
At leas tone non athlete attended /participated in the case of UL(even if that was parent of one of the athletes)so according to the NCAA it should be ok.Basically saying they've paid their dues for wrong doings with SACSCOC and NCAA bylaws don't apply in this case. [poop][poop][poop]
Can't wait to read UL's response for whoring.
Cory Magette and Lance Thomas. Nuff said.
wrong...already sent, received and filedThere is probably, a formal letter of apology coming from the NCAA, as we speak.
![]()
Basically saying they've paid their dues for wrong doings with SACSCOC and NCAA bylaws don't apply in this case. [poop][poop][poop]
Can't wait to read UL's response for whoring.
Of course they fail to mention the tremendously lopsided percentage of athletes taking the courses, as opposed to non-athletes.
wow...who knew that 47% of the student population at UNC were scholarship athletes (specifically Basketball)? Don't they scholarship limits? The right people are going to hear about this.Since when is 47% "lopsided"?
CC
I guess I will be the one dissenting opinion here. First off, the NCAA has no business regulating the classes on campus. It is the institutions role to assure qualified courses are being taught. If a college fails to educate because of a bogus class, the students should demand action.
Second, if you have ever been on a college campus, you know there are certain classes that are "athlete" friendly. They may not provide answers, but the classes are simply easier. I do not want the NCAA coming on campus and telling me what I should/should not teach.
Thirdly, At the same time an English class at UK will be different than an English class EKU. Different instructions, requirements, books, expectations. By the way some of you are talking, you believe all classes should be the same.
If you think the NCAA has a position to monitor classes, the next step is monitoring assignments, standardize testing, etc.
As for any benefits, yes the NCAA should come down hard on UNC.
Who's biased? Those two occurrences you mention would have been major violations anywhere else.So, comparing decades of academic fraud to... What, a high school kid getting a couple of bucks unrelated to college, and a borderline pro maybe getting a loan for gaudy jewelry which was again not connected to college.
As I said, you have no idea what you are talking about. Stop downplaying what happened at UNC due to your bias and lack of understanding.
I guess I will be the one dissenting opinion here. First off, the NCAA has no business regulating the classes on campus. It is the institutions role to assure qualified courses are being taught. If a college fails to educate because of a bogus class, the students should demand action.
Second, if you have ever been on a college campus, you know there are certain classes that are "athlete" friendly. They may not provide answers, but the classes are simply easier. I do not want the NCAA coming on campus and telling me what I should/should not teach.
Thirdly, At the same time an English class at UK will be different than an English class EKU. Different instructions, requirements, books, expectations. By the way some of you are talking, you believe all classes should be the same.
If you think the NCAA has a position to monitor classes, the next step is monitoring assignments, standardize testing, etc.
As for any benefits, yes the NCAA should come down hard on UNC.
Who's biased? Those two occurrences you mention would have been major violations anywhere else.