I really don't understand why people assume Barker is going to play like he did the first two games he ever played and in nasty weather without his running backs to boot. That just seems to be a stupid outlook. Johnson has never even played against this level of competition, people have never seen him live, and yet we have fans here than just "know" how good he is. Come-on people get real.
Well I was one that was wanting Barker to get some snaps all along (not replace Towles) and maybe if he had the season would have turned out differently. The silver lining is that the season turning out the way it did Kentucky got rid of some locker room issues and an OC that was in over his head.I know, right. Sounds a lot like the people that were calling on Barker to replace Patrick last year. Barker had never taken a snap yet people wanted him starting.
Well I was one that was wanting Barker to get some snaps all along (not replace Towles) and maybe if he had the season would have turned out differently. The silver lining is that the season turning out the way it did Kentucky got rid of some locker room issues and an OC that was in over his head.
Or why they've skipped over Gunnar Hoak. He's on campus as well. I see Hoak having as solid a shot at the job as Johnson.I really don't understand why people assume Barker is going to play like he did the first two games he ever played and in nasty weather without his running backs to boot. That just seems to be a stupid outlook. Johnson has never even played against this level of competition, people have never seen him live, and yet we have fans here than just "know" how good he is. Come-on people get real.
No kidding. If the first question to a QB recruit of "Do you expect to come in here & win the starting job" isnt answered with "Absolutely, without a doubt", then the kid isnt worth a scholarship.If he isn't confident then I don't want him as my QB.
Thank you Levibooty. And just who are these posters? I sometimes think that some of them are posers just trying to cause dissension on the board. - And others, I just question their knowledge and understanding of the sport. Go Cats!!I really don't understand why people assume Barker is going to play like he did the first two games he ever played and in nasty weather without his running backs to boot. That just seems to be a stupid outlook. Johnson has never even played against this level of competition, people have never seen him live, and yet we have fans here than just "know" how good he is. Come-on people get real.
First thing I thought too.SEC LBs/DEs will break a 180 pounder in half.
He is an older FR, so maybe so.Or why they've skipped over Gunnar Hoak. He's on campus as well. I see Hoak having as solid a shot at the job as Johnson.
Hoak should get his chance, but, if he doesn't win the job outright, then my hope would be for a redshirt.Or why they've skipped over Gunnar Hoak. He's on campus as well. I see Hoak having as solid a shot at the job as Johnson.
I agree on the locker room and OC issue. However I'm not sold on Barker. I don't think he is much different than Patrick. I'm biased though because I've never been a fan of the bigger QB's with cannons for arms. I'd much prefer a smaller QB who can make quick reads, and is mobile, rather than a big dude with bricks for feat and a huge arm who can't anticipate throwing lanes/windows.
LOL
"with bricks for feat"
That wasn't just for your spelling, I have no idea who you are but I would love to have the chance to bet on him in a race with you------or about 95% of the other posters on here.
He also won the shuttle event at the Elite 22 competition, which included a 5' 10" athlete playing QB. Huge misuse of his talent for him to not be allowed to run the ball last year.
Guess I got a D or an F on my essay, oh well. Not understanding what I have to do with being in a race with Barker, but I'll play your silly little game.
Yes, Barker would destroy me in a race. You got me, I can't be a P5 college QB. My jealousy of Barker led me to my comments above. :joy:
I don't think he is the answer at QB. If he wins the job, then good for him. In his limited time last year I saw several throws that were absolutely horrible and have yet to see this amazing speed that people keep talking about.
The point of my original post before you got sidetracked with spelling errors was that I would rather have a smaller, more elusive, and very accurate intermediate passer that I would a big, "fast", cannon arm QB. Being able to throw a football hard and far is great, but if you can't anticipate where your WR is going to be, it's pointless.
My prediction regarding Johnson at QB: PAIN!First thing I thought too.
First of all NEVER admit to a spelling error, call it a typo, you were on your iphone, typing while driving (well, maybe not), etc. And I seldom call out spelling because those things happen, although I cringe when I see how so many interchange reins and reigns, that is not a typo, but in this case I thought interchanging the letter was funny.
Also, sorry, but I thought you were talking about Towles, your description fit him much better IMO. If you can't outrun Barker then you aren't very fast.
And yes, our last QB that was good this century was a 5.6 that many on here claimed couldn't throw the ball ten yards, LOL. We have only had four four star QBs this century, (counting Moss, not 5.7 Newton, using Rivals) and so far only Woodson has panned out.
Of course he did didley until his fourth year, so too early to give up on Barker, in fact I would have liked to see Towles with these coaches AND improved talent (more experience and a left tackle mostly).
I always admit when I'm wrong, just one of my many character flaws I guess. Truth be told I was sitting at my desk at work and typing faster than I could think and not devoting the time to my post that was needed. lol
I'm not against any UK QB, I hope whoever is named the starter succeeds. I do however have a preference on the type of QB I would like to see run the type of offense that we have been told will be implemented with the new additions to the staff.
I suppose being a smaller guy leads me to support the smaller guys. I just think in size is highly overrated when it comes to QB's as well as arm strength, UNLESS they are being asked to throw deep post and go routes on a constant basis, then it's needed. Accuracy and quick decision making are much more important, IMO in the offense we will see.
Glad you didn't take my last post as me being serious. I never take message boards seriously, and always enjoy a good debate and other peoples opinions.
Maybe you would like to resurrect Audie Murphy, recruit him to UK and point to his WWII achievements and anoint him as our quarterback savior.I agree on the locker room and OC issue. However I'm not sold on Barker. I don't think he is much different than Patrick. I'm biased though because I've never been a fan of the bigger QB's with cannons for arms. I'd much prefer a smaller QB who can make quick reads, and is mobile, rather than a big dude with bricks for feat and a huge arm who can't anticipate throwing lanes/windows.
Maybe you would like to resurrect Audie Murphy, recruit him to UK and point to his WWII achievements and anoint him as our quarterback savior.
I think the reason people are high on Johnson, and are high in the backup QB in general, is that they know that a surprise talent is the only shot we have at a really great season. We've seen Barker. I'm not saying he can't develop into a nice QB, but from what we've seen, it's irrational to think he becomes a world beater by game 1, or really, even halfway through the season. Fans know that UK's only chance at having a big time season is finding a diamond in the rough. Our perpetual need for a savior is what always drives the fans to want the next thing. THat will only change when we finally land a legit superstar QB that can compete at the highest levels!
If any of them can hit receivers on short and medium routes then they should get a hard look.As Wyatt Earp said 'fast is fine but accuracy is everything",if they can throw a ball that can be caught in stride without the receiver having to make a circus catch put them out there.Quick slants,medium crossing routes or swing passes thrown on time will be more important than an occasional 60 yard bomb.