“Former National Security Advisor John Bolton admitted Wednesday that his testimony in President Donald Trump’s recent impeachment proceedings involving Ukraine would have had no impact on the trial’s outcome even after sections of his upcoming book leaked attempting to convict the president in its final days”.
I'm sure that this is true. If he had testified and confirmed evidence and testimony from others associated with Ukrainegate showing that Trump tried to shake down the Ukraine prez crooked Senate Repubs (Trump loyalists) wouldn't have cared and would have acquitted Trump anyways. Why is this a revelation to you and your peeps? How does it disprove anything that Trump is accused of doing in relation to Ukrainegate?“Former National Security Advisor John Bolton admitted Wednesday that his testimony in President Donald Trump’s recent impeachment proceedings involving Ukraine would have had no impact on the trial’s outcome even after sections of his upcoming book leaked attempting to convict the president in its final days”.
Confirmed “evidence”, ........ confirmed “EVIDENCE”If he had testified and confirmed evidence and testimony from others associated with Ukrainegate showing that Trump tried to shake down the Ukraine prez
Fell for what? The title of the article is BS of course as he did not "admit" it was a publicity stunt which it probably was though that's just an assumption made by the article author. Who leaked the book excerpts? maybe the Bolton camp but that's not clear either.
You've got nothing as usual.Confirmed “evidence”, ........ confirmed “EVIDENCE”
........... Now that’s funny!
That was last heard before the gavel came down in the Senate impeachment trial.You've got nothing as usual.
The article doesn’t support the headline.
How does it disprove anything that Trump is accused of doing in relation to Ukrainegate?
Wanna bet the Headline is however accurate?The article doesn’t support the headline.
Tell us some more conspiracy theories Moeliver Stone.I'm sure that this is true. If he had testified and confirmed evidence and testimony from others associated with Ukrainegate showing that Trump tried to shake down the Ukraine prez crooked Senate Repubs (Trump loyalists) wouldn't have cared and would have acquitted Trump anyways. Why is this a revelation to you and your peeps? How does it disprove anything that Trump is accused of doing in relation to Ukrainegate?
You wish. Everyone who is paying attention knows what Trump did, ask Romney.That was last heard before the gavel came down in the Senate impeachment trial.
........ that would be the famous Pierre Dilecto you speak of? Good one Moe.You wish. Everyone who is paying attention knows what Trump did, ask Romney.
I can't blame you for ignoring all things that don't agree with your theories......... that would be the famous Pierre Dilecto you speak of? Good one Moe.
Gallup poll says they love him for it too.You wish. Everyone who is paying attention knows what Trump did, ask Romney.
I suspect moe does a very good impersonation of Adam Schiifftt. No matter how loudly the word is spoken, moe can twist them 180 degrees..You've got nothing as usual.
I'm sure that this is true. If he had testified and confirmed evidence and testimony from others associated with Ukrainegate showing that Trump tried to shake down the Ukraine prez crooked Senate Repubs (Trump loyalists) wouldn't have cared and would have acquitted Trump anyways. Why is this a revelation to you and your peeps? How does it disprove anything that Trump is accused of doing in relation to Ukrainegate?
Lol they crack me up on here
Lol they crack me up on here