Week 3 Computer Polls

[TexasTrill2018]

https://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/

3. Oklahoma
15. Oklahoma State
18. TCU
22. West Virginia
32 Texas
49. Kansas St
57. Texas Tech
61. Iowa State
65. Baylor
103. Kansas

 

[JustCallMeDad]

Sounds like the computers are smarter than the AP voters

 

[locustwv]

Sounds like the computers are smarter than the AP voters

Nope

 

[xgunnx]

TexasDillrod you're trying to hard. After two games the sagarins is not as accurate as it would be, like it would be towards the end of the season. That is when such rankings carry more weight with the CFP selection committee. Computer rankings rely on data the more data, ergo more games played, the ranking becomes more accurate.

Texas "Choke 'ems"

It's supposed to be doing more with less not doing less with more. Like The Longhorns have been doing for awhile now.

 

[countryroads89_rivals]

https://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/

3. Oklahoma
15. Oklahoma State
18. TCU
22. West Virginia
32 Texas
49. Kansas St
57. Texas Tech
61. Iowa State
65. Baylor
103. Kansas

Computer rankings are meaningless until after about 6 games with all of the non-conference games and cupcakes on schedules. That is exactly why they don’t even do any CFP rankings until then.

The older I get the less tolerance I have for stupidity.

 

[still5-0vstarheels]

Computer rankings are meaningless until after about 6 games with all of the non-conference games and cupcakes on schedules. That is exactly why they don’t even do any CFP rankings until then.

The older I get the less tolerance I have for stupidity.

With all these Texas and Pitt trolls, you have plenty of opportunity to develop more tolerance to stupidity. These Texas fans make the Marshall fans look like geniuses.

 

[TownesVanZandt_rivals]

Computer rankings are meaningless until after about 6 games with all of the non-conference games and cupcakes on schedules. That is exactly why they don’t even do any CFP rankings until then.

The older I get the less tolerance I have for stupidity.

Human polls any better