What BIG team can least afford to lose their QB?

[blion72]

some teams have pedestrian QBs, and may not lose much if they lost their #1 QB. other teams have some depth and #2 is not that far off the #1. Who are the teams that if they lost #1 would become a completely different team.

two that come to mind might be UMich and Maryland.

 

[Nitt1300]

you should have posted a poll

but it's Meatchicken

 

[CDLionFL]

Firmly on board with the Maryland sentiment. That team is wildly different without Taulia's influence back there. If Michigan's starter goes down, they can just hand it to the RBs 50 times and rely on their defense.

 

[Ludd]

Maryland for sure. We saw what they looked like last year with him being hobbled.

 

[Midnighter]

USC

 

[DaytonRickster]

Firmly on board with the Maryland sentiment. That team is wildly different without Taulia's influence back there. If Michigan's starter goes down, they can just hand it to the RBs 50 times and rely on their defense.

I think Michigan's backup QB is former IU starter.

 

[ManxomeLion]

Firmly on board with the Maryland sentiment. That team is wildly different without Taulia's influence back there. If Michigan's starter goes down, they can just hand it to the RBs 50 times and rely on their defense.

That approach certainly worked* when Iowa's Michigan QB went down.

*against Michigan State. Other situations may not apply