Toggle sidebar

What Mueller found

T

tjebarr

Senior
Feb 3, 2007
25,122
917
0
DvlDog4WVU said:
He found enough evidence to completely exonerated the President of collusion. He also found that the last administration did nothing to prevent election interference.
Click to expand...

what did he find about obstruction of justice Devil? you left that out. You are the one Trumper on here that sees him for what he really is.
 
DvlDog4WVU

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,230
3,298
113
tjebarr said:
what did he find about obstruction of justice Devil? you left that out. You are the one Trumper on here that sees him for what he really is.
Click to expand...
He found instances that had they been executed would’ve been clear cut cases of obstruction. However, he didn’t find definitive obstruction or he’d have said so. In the end, he shone light on the dirty nature of politics in Washington.

And quite frankly, the bar was established by Democrats at collusion. Trump was completely exonerated of collusion and conspiracy. Mueller said so. I don’t care about the appearance of obstruction, because Mueller was provided everything and everyone he wanted. His case wasn’t strong enough for collusion to warrant the sit down with the POTUS for potential obstruction.

You all got what you wanted. You got his mandate to stall. You picked up seats in Congress. I dare you all to go after impeachment without an actual crime. You’ll stomp all over the Dem candidates press coverage and it will once again be the Trump show. Moreover, even the futile impeachment efforts are going to be drowned out by what’s coming with the FISA.
 
M

mofo

Redshirt
Jul 30, 2001
28,230
24
0
Democrats are going "down the drain" on extending this effort..

Their answer was prefabricated no matter what the report stated...

Democrats "shot high" and missed,
Trump now has free to conduct himself in way he suits himself and the country .

Ticket to reelection
 
T

tjebarr

Senior
Feb 3, 2007
25,122
917
0
DvlDog4WVU said:
He found instances that had they been executed would’ve been clear cut cases of obstruction. However, he didn’t find definitive obstruction or he’d have said so. In the end, he shone light on the dirty nature of politics in Washington.

And quite frankly, the bar was established by Democrats at collusion. Trump was completely exonerated of collusion and conspiracy. Mueller said so. I don’t care about the appearance of obstruction, because Mueller was provided everything and everyone he wanted. His case wasn’t strong enough for collusion to warrant the sit down with the POTUS for potential obstruction.

You all got what you wanted. You got his mandate to stall. You picked up seats in Congress. I dare you all to go after impeachment without an actual crime. You’ll stomp all over the Dem candidates press coverage and it will once again be the Trump show. Moreover, even the futile impeachment efforts are going to be drowned out by what’s coming with the FISA.
Click to expand...

ok, so serious question. if Don Mcghan fires Mueller like Trump told him. Would that be obstruction
 
M

mofo

Redshirt
Jul 30, 2001
28,230
24
0
tjebarr said:
ok, so serious question. if Don Mcghan fires Mueller like Trump told him. Would that be obstruction
Click to expand...


He didn't fire Mueller, so it wasn't...

Ps...president has the constitutional right to fire Mueller; therefore, answer no..

Change the constitution of you wish
 
C

countryroads89_rivals

Sophomore
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
DvlDog4WVU said:
He found enough evidence to completely exonerated the President of collusion. He also found that the last administration did nothing to prevent election interference.
Click to expand...

And the trump campaign never even reported the Russian interference to authorities and in fact, welcomed it.
 
B

BobbyBoucheer

All-Conference
May 29, 2014
21,917
1,994
0
tjebarr said:
ok, so serious question. if Don Mcghan fires Mueller like Trump told him. Would that be obstruction
Click to expand...

If and buts TJ.

Come on man, Trump knew this whole thing was a political witch hunt and he fought back.....you would do the same.

Potus has a **** load of foibles and I'm sure your ire is justified to you and yours but your rage is focused and biased.

The circumstances of this investigation matters........you ignore the more important story just like most of the liberal and bias media.

History will not be kind to the criminality of the HRC, Obama, Comey, Brennan, and all of those involved with the ******** dossier.
 
C

countryroads89_rivals

Sophomore
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
BobbyBoucheer said:
If and buts TJ.

Come on man, Trump knew this whole thing was a political witch hunt and he fought back.....you would do the same.

Potus has a **** load of foibles and I'm sure your ire is justified to you and yours but your rage is focused and biased.

The circumstances of this investigation matters........you ignore the more important story just like most of the liberal and bias media.

History will not be kind to the criminality of the HRC, Obama, Comey, Brennan, and all of those involved with the ******** dossier.
Click to expand...

Hahahahahahahahahahaha!
 
M

mofo

Redshirt
Jul 30, 2001
28,230
24
0
Democrats better focus on infrastructure and immigration or next election will be a blow out
 
T

tjebarr

Senior
Feb 3, 2007
25,122
917
0
BobbyBoucheer said:
If and buts TJ.

Come on man, Trump knew this whole thing was a political witch hunt and he fought back.....you would do the same.

Potus has a **** load of foibles and I'm sure your ire is justified to you and yours but your rage is focused and biased.

The circumstances of this investigation matters........you ignore the more important story just like most of the liberal and bias media.

History will not be kind to the criminality of the HRC, Obama, Comey, Brennan, and all of those involved with the ******** dossier.
Click to expand...

Mueller investigated whether Trump attended a 2016 chess championship alongside Russians
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/do...chess-championship-alongside-russians-n996786
 
T

tjebarr

Senior
Feb 3, 2007
25,122
917
0
DvlDog4WVU said:
Probably. He didn’t, so it’s pointless to even discuss.
Click to expand...

Imagine for 1 second that we are talking about Obama directing a white house attorney to obstruct justice by terminating the guy that was hired to investigate him. or better yet, its Hillary. you guys would be going ape **** and you know it.
 
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,583
6,167
113
countryroads89 said:
And the trump campaign never even reported the Russian interference to authorities and in fact, welcomed it.
Click to expand...

And Hillary paid her law firm to pay for Steele's Russian produced lies on that dossier. Then paid Steele to shop it around for buyers. But let's not look into that "collusion" huh?
 
Last edited:
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,583
6,167
113
tjebarr said:
Conway questions why Mueller left obstruction of justice question unanswered in report | Fox News
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/co...tion-of-justice-question-unanswered-in-report
Click to expand...

Yeah but how about another "collusion" link barr? That was far more interesting. Mueller isn't looking into "obstruction" anymore. He wasn't "obstructed" from concluding "no collusion". I want to see some more "collusion" links dammit! You were so good at linking those daily! What's happened to you?
 
DvlDog4WVU

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,230
3,298
113
tjebarr said:
Imagine for 1 second that we are talking about Obama directing a white house attorney to obstruct justice by terminating the guy that was hired to investigate him. or better yet, its Hillary. you guys would be going ape **** and you know it.
Click to expand...
Nope. I’m actually focused on the actual obstruction by Hillary. Obama stonewalled and outright shutdown investigations into legitimate needle moving issues, specifically the Hezbollah drugs for cash/weapons ring. You all have lost the bubble on reality with Trump. It’s an all at assault to get him out of office, for anything.
 
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,583
6,167
113
mofo said:
Democrats better focus on infrastructure and immigration or next election will be a blow out
Click to expand...

I'd rather they focus on that new green deal and reparations for 4th & 5th generation descendents of Slaves. That'll convince all of those White suburban College educated independents to vote Democrat in 2020!:stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:
 
bornaneer

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,946
1,662
113
The bottom line is that Mueller COULD HAVE indicted Trump if he had the goods on him. He did NOT indict.
 
bornaneer

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,946
1,662
113
tjebarr said:
i did.
Click to expand...
Here....let me help you out:
“That’s not really the job of a prosecutor. The job of a prosecutor is to gather evidence and decide whether to indict or to decline to indict,” Conway said on ABC’s “This Week.” “They declined to indict. ”
 
Last edited:
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,583
6,167
113
DvlDog4WVU said:
Nope. I’m actually focused on the actual obstruction by Hillary. Obama stonewalled and outright shutdown investigations into legitimate needle moving issues, specifically the Hezbollah drugs for cash/weapons ring. You all have lost the bubble on reality with Trump. It’s an all at assault to get him out of office, for anything.
Click to expand...

There is no other reason why we are discussing any of this DvlDog. They still refuse to accept Hillary's defeat and one way or another it MUST be undone.
 
M

mofo

Redshirt
Jul 30, 2001
28,230
24
0
atlkvb said:
I'd rather they focus on that new green deal and reparations for 4th & 5th generation descendents of Slaves. That'll convince all of those White suburban College educated independents to vote Democrat in 2020!:stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:
Click to expand...


There's nothing "green"
about the new green deal...
 
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,583
6,167
113
tjebarr said:
country, this is one particular that these trumpers here seem to struggle with
Click to expand...

Hey barr...if Hillary attempted to hide her illegal server would that be the same as illegally hiding it with "intent"?

Comey cleared her of "intent" to break the Law so why is Trump guilty of "obstruction" for simply attempting to have Mueller fired even if he didn't "intend" to fire him?
 
M

mofo

Redshirt
Jul 30, 2001
28,230
24
0
atlkvb said:
Hey barr...if Hillary attempted to hide her illegal server would that be the same as illegally hiding it with "intent"?

Comey cleared her of "intent" to break the Law so why is Trump guilty of "obstruction" for simply attempting to have Mueller fired even if he didn't "intend" to fire him?
Click to expand...

Ps...I worked for the federal government for many years, and "any other" federal worker would have had their security clearance pulled...

You can't work without a security clearance...done
 
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,583
6,167
113
mofo said:
Well said.

Better not get rid of airplane travel,
I'm flying next week
Click to expand...

I also sell big gas guzzling pick up trucks and SUVs so I'm definitely not down with eliminating internal combustion engines!:scream:
 
bornaneer

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,946
1,662
113
countryroads89 said:
The AG doesn’t decide whether or not to prosecute the President, moron.
Click to expand...
Never said any such thing........Mueller COULD indict.....Mueller is not the AG. The question was about Mueller's ability to indict Trump if he had the evidence.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom