That list looks pretty spot-on.
Yeah, I'd have them as the first to drop off the list, but it could be argued either way.Looks like a fan vote. But Michigan? Really? They're getting a lot of mileage out of that half a national championship they're won in the past 70+ years.
not all blue bloods win titlesLooks like a fan vote. But Michigan? Really? They're getting a lot of mileage out of that half a national championship they're won in the past 70+ years.
not all blue bloods win titles
Michigan's bonafides = the helmet, the victors, the game, and I suppose their all time number of wins
Nittany Nation must not have seen this poll. I didn’t. Another 11% out of 170,000 votes is nothing for us to overcome, given the chance. It’s the old Natty’s vs total body of work discussion.
If PSU were playing at a higher level recently we would be on that list.
Neither one would put PSU in that list. Biggest negatives there are success under a single coach, limited to 1 decade, no conference until mid 90s. Having only 2 titles with the last one 35 years ago isn't going to overcome those.Nittany Nation must not have seen this poll. I didn’t. Another 11% out of 170,000 votes is nothing for us to overcome, given the chance. It’s the old Natty’s vs total body of work discussion.
Since 2000 PSU has been pretty averageIf PSU were playing at a higher level recently we would be on that list.
Unfortunately this is true.Since 2000 PSU has been pretty average
But we arent.If PSU were playing at a higher level recently we would be on that list.