Who's the idiot that doesn't think Jeter is a HOFer?

Glenn's Take

Well-known member
May 20, 2012
12,473
14,646
113
Some of these guys just need to get over themselves. He was 1 vote short of being unanimous. He's as clear a Hall of Famer as there is.
 

funKYcat75

Well-known member
Apr 10, 2008
32,271
40,649
112
If the point of the no-vote was that Jeter didn’t deserve 100% because only one player should get it (Rivera), then it’s fine. Whatever. Most likely it was some numbnut trying to get attention.
 

John Henry

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2007
35,506
172,376
113
I agree with him but the guy missed almost half his career in prison..Saw the best years I guess
I would not want O.J. upset with me. He will split your throat and cut off your head before you can say Jack White. Cold blooded murderer but he could carry a football and knows something about going into a Hall of Fame.

But back to the point of the thread. Yes there is always an idiot in the crowd and this idiot thought Jeter did not deserve the Hall of Fame. The voter has a problem
 

JBHolmesfan

New member
Jul 23, 2009
8,181
4,747
0
Same person who thought Griffey Jr wasn't?
I think Jeter should’ve been unanimous, but I don’t like how some voters wouldn’t do it out of principle so a guy like Griffey wouldn’t be unanimous. For that reason, I don’t care too much that he wasn’t unanimous. If Griffey wasn’t then no one should. However, it bothers me that Mariano Rivera is the lone unanimous Hall of Famer. That’s stupid. In conclusion, the Hall of Fame voters suck.
 

gamecockcat

New member
Oct 29, 2004
10,524
13,500
0
How do guys like Billy Wagner and Scott Rolen all of a sudden jump up about 20% in voting? I mean both of those guys were good but in no way, shape or form were they HOF'ers. I mean, Scott Rolen? When he was in his prime, did opposing teams think, 'Oh man, we've gotta pitch around Rolen tonight"? Unlike Bonds who was pitched around, intentionally walked, etc. The baseball HOF is becoming the Hall of Better Than Average for a Long Time. I mean, at least Sheffield was a monster that you had to take into account when it came to strategy. But, guys like Rolen (and others)? Gimme a break.

While everyone here is ecstatic that Larry Walker made it, I question his election, too. The least # of hits by a RF in the HOF. Had good numbers, for sure, and won several batting titles so I guess the argument could be made for his inclusion. But, while he was playing, did anyone ever think, 'there's an obvious HOF'er'? To me, a HOF player is probably someone who would be elected on the first or second ballot every time. If you wait 10 years and, just because the field is kind of slim in a particular year, you finally make it then, to me, that means the evidence is not overwhelming in your favor and, for HOF voting, I don't think you should round up.
 

bthaunert

New member
Apr 4, 2007
29,518
21,619
0
Now that the precedent has been set that guys don't get in on the first vote, it doesn't bother me. It's dumb, but it doesn't bother me. I mean, it Ty Cobb and Babe Ruth didn't get every vote in 1936, I guess Jeter doesn't deserve it in 2020.
 

420grover

New member
Mar 26, 2006
7,703
7,860
0
Now that the precedent has been set that guys don't get in on the first vote, it doesn't bother me. It's dumb, but it doesn't bother me. I mean, it Ty Cobb and Babe Ruth didn't get every vote in 1936, I guess Jeter doesn't deserve it in 2020.
Just because something has always been stupid doesn't mean it needs to remain stupid.
 

CB3UK

Active member
Apr 15, 2012
294,359
102,890
78
It's just baseball tradition. I'm good with it. What worked habe been uproarious is ifhe didn't get voted in first time up though.
 

JamesIII

Active member
Oct 21, 2003
3,323
3,391
62
It took Barry Larkin 3 tries to get in, but Jeter didn't get one vote and the people saying the HOF voting needs revamped...Jeter is barely above Larkin in WAR. Also, when you look at their stats comparatively based on games played, I would take Larkin over Jeter any day.

#homer
 
  • Like
Reactions: rudd1

akers65

New member
Jan 23, 2008
5,993
5,523
0
Correct answer is there’s one voter (can’t remember name) who stated years ago that he wasn’t going to vote anyone in the first time He’s just an a$$
 

rudd1

New member
Oct 3, 2007
14,419
21,101
0
It took Barry Larkin 3 tries to get in, but Jeter didn't get one vote and the people saying the HOF voting needs revamped...Jeter is barely above Larkin in WAR. Also, when you look at their stats comparatively based on games played, I would take Larkin over Jeter any day.

#homer

-damn straight.

-he belongs in the hof, but jeter's "legend" wouldn't be the same if he played for the brewers/twins et al. Big market media. Harrumph.
 
Apr 13, 2002
44,001
97,143
0
Now that the precedent has been set that guys don't get in on the first vote, it doesn't bother me. It's dumb, but it doesn't bother me. I mean, it Ty Cobb and Babe Ruth didn't get every vote in 1936, I guess Jeter doesn't deserve it in 2020.

Iirc the only unanimous selection in history was Rivera. Ruth, Mantle, etc weren't unanimous.

So I'm not sure why anyone was floored Jeter wasn't unanimous.
 
Dec 2, 2004
4,127
1,608
0
Iirc the only unanimous selection in history was Rivera. Ruth, Mantle, etc weren't unanimous.

So I'm not sure why anyone was floored Jeter wasn't unanimous.
Correct, which is absolutely insane. He was a freaking closer. Guys like Ryan, Seaver, Maddux, etc.. who threw for 15-20 years and kept an ERA at around 3 is in my mind significantly better than having one dominant pitch that you use to throw 3 outs effectively every couple of games. Tom Glavine faced over 18,000 batters and only walked 1500. In a 21 year career. He averaged 32 starts and never walked 100 batters in a season. It's absolutely insane.