Do you think if we some how land Stokes, it would help dampen Pope's obvious third year woes? Or do you think Stokes or not, we will be bad next year?
This thread is really for those who want Pope gone after year 3.
As one of those posters, I feel like if we do land Stokes, it would be interesting to see how he performs and how Pope would use him. Would he limit him to fit his "system" or let him go at it? I would say it would increase my optimism by 25% from 5%. Would it justify me changing my mind that Pope should leave after year 3? Nope. But it would be a better tool in the shed to use so we are not embarrassed next year.
What do you guys think?
This thread is really for those who want Pope gone after year 3.
As one of those posters, I feel like if we do land Stokes, it would be interesting to see how he performs and how Pope would use him. Would he limit him to fit his "system" or let him go at it? I would say it would increase my optimism by 25% from 5%. Would it justify me changing my mind that Pope should leave after year 3? Nope. But it would be a better tool in the shed to use so we are not embarrassed next year.
What do you guys think?
