All I got are these 2 eyes and a TV, but gosh darn it I think 3, 4 & 5 are our best options and should see the field the most. “The playbook, the right way, bla bla bla”. Gimme athletes in space I wanna win!
I want the total package. Can catch, willing to do the dirty work and block nasty, and knows where they're supposed to be. I think too many dudes come in as former number ones and don't adapt well to the team gameAll I got are these 2 eyes and a TV, but gosh darn it I think 3, 4 & 5 are our best options and should see the field the most. “The playbook, the right way, bla bla bla”. Gimme athletes in space I wanna win!
Exactly. Let them make plays!!!! Add #15 to listAll I got are these 2 eyes and a TV, but gosh darn it I think 3, 4 & 5 are our best options and should see the field the most. “The playbook, the right way, bla bla bla”. Gimme athletes in space I wanna win!
Clemson won a Nattie with a walk on WR playing at least half of their snaps and he had the game winning TD in one of their playoff wins.....This is a position where it looks like the coaches feel they have to throw a random walk on out there on most plays. Problem is they are awful. No top notch program does this. It’s an embarrassment that this happens at Nebraska. It’s obvious who the playmakers are.
Walk on is a euphemism for white guy. When I see walk on wide open, I don't care. Throw him the ball.This is a position where it looks like the coaches feel they have to throw a random walk on out there on most plays. Problem is they are awful. No top notch program does this. It’s an embarrassment that this happens at Nebraska. It’s obvious who the playmakers are.
Oliver Martin is either 2nd or 3rd. He wasn’t 100% So they rested himAll I got are these 2 eyes and a TV, but gosh darn it I think 3, 4 & 5 are our best options and should see the field the most. “The playbook, the right way, bla bla bla”. Gimme athletes in space I wanna win!
Leiwer is the only true walk on WR getting snaps I think and he's proven it in practice and games. I don't understand the hate. He's a really good player who didn't get much attention because of where he went to high school. He was a really nice pick up for us.Walk on is a euphemism for white guy. When I see walk on wide open, I don't care. Throw him the ball.
Apparently all things considered he's better than the guys behind him on the depth chart. I don't care how many stars you had coming out of high school if you can't be depended on to run the right route and catch the ball. You have to prove it in practice or you're not going to get thrown out there to "let em play".Leiwer should be lower on the depth chart. He isn’t that good. The other guys just need to step it up in practice
Are you advocating we reduce the walk on program?? Sounds good to me. Spend more time coaching the first three units.This is a position where it looks like the coaches feel they have to throw a random walk on out there on most plays. Problem is they are awful. No top notch program does this. It’s an embarrassment that this happens at Nebraska. It’s obvious who the playmakers are.
What about 89 who did not play but had over 100 yards against Illinois?All I got are these 2 eyes and a TV, but gosh darn it I think 3, 4 & 5 are our best options and should see the field the most. “The playbook, the right way, bla bla bla”. Gimme athletes in space I wanna win!
This is a position where it looks like the coaches feel they have to throw a random walk on out there on most plays. Problem is they are awful. No top notch program does this. It’s an embarrassment that this happens at Nebraska. It’s obvious who the playmakers are.
There was one 3rd down play where Manning was running downfield one-on-one vs a CB with no safety help. Martinez hesitated for several seconds before dumping the ball short of the first down marker. Why can't we throw the ball to our 6'4" 225 beast and let him go get it? It's freaking Fordham
See the quote above Pennsy. AMart has to pull the trigger. I think I know exactly the play ATL is talking about. Moron Millen doing color said he was covered, though Manning was running a post iirc and had the DB beat with no help. Throw it up to the beast of a receiver and let him get it. Otherwise why do we go after 6'3" ish 220lb WRs?Manning is all hype and no production. Where is Will Nixon who we kept hearing about? Brewington and Allen need more touches. Toure is our best weapon. Martin is good too when not injured.
But Frost has utterly failed to recruit a Stanley Morgan or even a Kenny Bell type guy. I sometimes wonder if this coaching staff’s biggest weakness is in talent evaluation. Guys who look good on paper and who maybe pass an eyeball test aren’t necessarily going to be the best players. The best coaches have an eye for that, a knack for sensing that. I don’t think this staff spends the time required to develop that skill set.
I think Manning has looked great, just need to get it to him.Manning is all hype and no production. Where is Will Nixon who we kept hearing about? Brewington and Allen need more touches. Toure is our best weapon. Martin is good too when not injured.
But Frost has utterly failed to recruit a Stanley Morgan or even a Kenny Bell type guy. I sometimes wonder if this coaching staff’s biggest weakness isn’t in talent evaluation. Guys who look good on paper and who maybe pass an eyeball test aren’t necessarily going to be the best players. The best coaches have an eye for that, a knack for sensing that. I don’t think this staff spends the time required to develop that skill set.
That’s an exception - not a rule. If you think we are getting back to being a top program with players like Liewer at WR then you are going to be greatly disappointed. Not saying you specifically- but some of the other posts in his thread are just plain silly. Liewer is not a great player, he’s not a good player and honestly he’s not a division 1 player and his 5 catches for 35 career yards proves it.Hunter Renfrow was a walk on at Clemson. It’s not uncommon. I think you’ll see others overtaking him as the year goes on.
You sir are correct but our coaches are addicted to being right instead of winning. I don't want to see Liewer, Faulk or Belt unless its ST or really really really garbage time.. Dafuq coaches??!!All I got are these 2 eyes and a TV, but gosh darn it I think 3, 4 & 5 are our best options and should see the field the most. “The playbook, the right way, bla bla bla”. Gimme athletes in space I wanna win!
Walk on is a euphemism for white guy. When I see walk on wide open, I don't care. Throw him the ball.
No, no one is complaining about Oliver Martin because he's actually good..Walk on is a euphemism for white guy. When I see walk on wide open, I don't care. Throw him the ball.
Lol Martin was a 4*What about 89 who did not play but had over 100 yards against Illinois?
Absolutely, Martin looked very solid against Illinois.Oliver Martin is either 2nd or 3rd. He wasn’t 100% So they rested him
Took me a minute. Lol. The thunder God can sling it better.They could all be stars, if we didn’t have a QB who throws like a left handed Rick Allen.
What a freakin’ great reference!!!!They could all be stars, if we didn’t have a QB who throws like a left handed Rick Allen.
This is a position where it looks like the coaches feel they have to throw a random walk on out there on most plays. Problem is they are awful. No top notch program does this. It’s an embarrassment that this happens at Nebraska. It’s obvious who the playmakers are.
Clemson won a Nattie with a walk on WR playing at least half of their snaps and he had the game winning TD in one of their playoff wins.....
Leiwer is the only true walk on WR getting snaps I think and he's proven it in practice and games. I don't understand the hate. He's a really good player who didn't get much attention because of where he went to high school. He was a really nice pick up for us.
If you have some walk ons with the kind of speed some of those kids do, it's a great place to use their talents. Damn. Why are the walk ons taking such a beating this week? We've got a walk on DB who showed up in the spring game who is one of our fastest DBs and the kid can tackle. He's on kick offs. Is that a bad thing?Yup...and KO coverage as well. It's almost like there is some kinda unwritten rule that you MUST play 4 walk on on KO.
Holla
That’s an exception - not a rule. If you think we are getting back to being a top program with players like Liewer at WR then you are going to be greatly disappointed. Not saying you specifically- but some of the other posts in his thread are just plain silly. Liewer is not a great player, he’s not a good player and honestly he’s not a division 1 player and his 5 catches for 35 career yards proves it.
Have you watched the kid play? He's been one of our most consistent WRs for the past two years. I realize that's like being the skinniest Iowa cheerleader but damn. Betts can't figure out where he's supposed to run his routes and apparently Manning has had some issues. We need a lot of WRs to play to keep guys fresh so Liewer plays. He's a solid player. People hear white walk on WR and they assume he's slow. That isn't the case.C'mon man....
Holla
We've had multiple white walk on WRs at least get signed by NFL teams over the past 20 years. He's a good player or he wouldn't be playing. I don't know why guys like Nixon and Brown haven't taken on bigger roles but something tells me it has to do with their route running and blocking.Only Nebraska coaches and a few fans who are more fans of the walk on program than they are of winning games thinks that kid is a good D1 WR. It's comical...
Holla
Do you remember one of our WRs only making it in to NU because of relaxation of admissions standards because of COVID? I do. Manning struggled to get eligible as well. I don't know how to break it to everyone but not every football player is on the Honor Roll in high school. The play book isn't that tough. Missing practice time doesn't help you either.How complicated is the playbook for college players to learn to get on the field? If it’s that hard to decipher then simplify otherwise the “dudes” everyone thinks should be playing, learn it enough to get it done during the week.
If you have some walk ons with the kind of speed some of those kids do, it's a great place to use their talents. Damn. Why are the walk ons taking such a beating this week? We've got a walk on DB who showed up in the spring game who is one of our fastest DBs and the kid can tackle. He's on kick offs. Is that a bad thing?
We've had multiple white walk on WRs at least get signed by NFL teams over the past 20 years. He's a good player or he wouldn't be playing. I don't know why guys like Nixon and Brown haven't taken on bigger roles but something tells me it has to do with their route running and blocking.
I expect us to play the guys who give us the best chance to win. If Betts can't figure out how to get to where he needs to be and can't catch the ball I don't want him on the field just because he's bigger and faster. We played multiple WRs "starters minutes" . I don't really care who trots out on the field for the first play. I'm fine with the kid being in the 2 deep and beyond that it's up to other players beating him out. Being the fastest or biggest WR on the field doesn't mean you're going to be somebody we can depend on to catch a 10 yard pass on 3rd and 8. EVERYBODY wants all of our WRs to be able to house every catch they make but they have to run the right route, catch the ball and be able to block on the >50% of our plays that are run plays.Ok....What are your expectations of the program? If you are ok with guys like Leiwer starting and getting starters minutes you should probably lower your expectation. He's not starting anywhere in the BIG...I'm sorry
Holla
That was the post route correct? He had a step too. That was a bad decision. Fear of failureThere was one 3rd down play where Manning was running downfield one-on-one vs a CB with no safety help. Martinez hesitated for several seconds before dumping the ball short of the first down marker. Why can't we throw the ball to our 6'4" 225 beast and let him go get it? It's freaking Fordham