Read this from Clemson Insiders Donors not holding back
- Thread starter rgamecock1
- Start date
Speaking the truth with no punches pulled.
It's no longer college sports but NFL minor leagues and requires that CEO mentality that colleges coaches are not ready for.
It's no longer college sports but NFL minor leagues and requires that CEO mentality that colleges coaches are not ready for.
and it's sad that they get clobbered for not wanting to be that way
t
Its an interesting read. Say what you want about Clemson, in general their donor base has higher expectations that ours and wont just take a 41 point loss.
CEO and X's and O's might be too much for a "coach" to handle.
As mentioned in the Clemson Insider piece, a coach probably will not be willing to be subordinate to a CEO and I don't blame them. Things, they are a changing!
This landscape is not why the vast majority got into coaching; the guy at Indiana seems to be an exception, maybe Saban. People who haven't experienced it have chortled and sniggled when Ive said this before but there are life lessons from a good coach and football program that stick with you for life; I don't sense that as compatible with or doable in the CEO approach.
To me, a GM is just another name for a HC. Sounds like a demotion for Dabo.
An interesting piece; thanmks for sharing.
An interesting piece; thanmks for sharing.
I'm sure an increasing number of kids coming to play college football now have zero interest in a life lesson.
Bottom line, some of the donors want an NFL style team. Personally, I don't know what Dabo really brings to the table in that model. He doesn't seem to be a great Xs and Os coach. His strong suit used to be recruiting, but NIL has changed the recruiting landscape so much. I'm not sure his aw shucks/good Christian man/cheerleader schtick still sells like it used to.
If someone else is making personnel and operational decisions, what will Dabo actually be doing? It sound like the donors that talked about a general manager don't want to say the hard part out loud, that they want Dabo gone and someone else running the program.
If someone else is making personnel and operational decisions, what will Dabo actually be doing? It sound like the donors that talked about a general manager don't want to say the hard part out loud, that they want Dabo gone and someone else running the program.
It's a demotion for any coach. Bring in a GM and the head coach is not in charge of the football program any longer.
I think thats their whole issue. They need a GM to put players on the field. Dabo wants to recruit players who "want to be there" and then magically develop them.
I still think he throws up his hands at some point and walks away. Probably when that GM is hired at Clemson.
Dabo (and myself to a large degree) still believes in evaluating and recruiting HS players, bringing them into the system and developing them over a few years until they are stars in their junior and senior seasons and building strong depth. Unfortunately, NIL and, to a greater degree, the portal have made that philosophy very difficult to implement in real life. Second year players who are going to be great in the future get impatient for quality playing time and transfer. Players get messages that another team will pay them much more money if they go there. There are no real rules anymore.
Like 18, I applaud Dabo for his stance and his vision of what college football should be. Unfortunately for Dabo, that vision doesn't look like it is going to lead to the success the spoiled Clemson faithful are going to demand.
If Clemson hires a GM, Dabo could throw up his hands and walk away, or, he could shrug and say "OK, I'll hang around making $11 million a year and let your whiz bang GM catch all the heat".
I don't think it was ever an option. The Bama people I know never showed any interest in Dabo. They talked about trying to get Kirby from UGA.
That is amazing. Its like they couldn't buy good recruits, so they had to settle. Then they spend a bunch of money on keeping those recruits that no one wanted.
They do have some leftovers of the highly rated classes. Maybe they are spending all their money on those few to keep them there.
It's just the Jimmys and Joes. The OL is pretty bad. The skill players are nothing great. It does suck what CFB has come to. But that's the game now and if you don't play it you will most likely lose it. Let's not pretend there were always teams at a recruiting disadvantage.
True
Clempson was very good at buying recruits when it wasn’t legal
But now they don’t have the ability to do so when it is legal.
I guess a discounted Lake Front House was a bigger draw when it was illegal.
Not many ever have; they get it from osmosis. Point is that the historical structure of high school and college football programs are based on those lessons to effectively function as a unit; I think most head coaches at that level anyway are more drawn to being leaders than they are to being a boss.
I knew that was the swirling rumor but I don't believe Bama would have really ever taken him. I could be wrong. On the other hand, he did "beat" Saban in the title game .... on a last second ILLEGAL PICK PLAY. (Something about Clemmons and winning illegal "titles." Ostarine Cheatas is what I call them.
NIL was the worst thing to ever happen to Clemson, Auburn and FSU football. All three lost their recruiting advantage when other teams could pay players.
Clemson was fine with NIL when it was illegal and they were paying for top talent. Now the field is level. Get used to it taters
Dabo coached them to a win in their conference opener after they looked dead on arrival in the first half.
Must be nice.
Must be nice.
I blame the weather delay. UNC appeared to be on the way to touchdown when the weather delay happened. Conspiracy theories abound. Don`t know what happened but when I heard about the game again Clemson was leading.
We both know there ain't no "theory" to it. - UNC had the momentum, was effectively about to score, and someone @ Clemson pulled the plug on that immediately....
Which got me thinking, there ought to be at least an addendum to the "lightning strike within 8 miles of the stadium" rule.... ok, fine. I get it, BUT, if a team is inside the 20 they should let it play out until there is either a turnover on downs, a field goal, or a TD and the PAT attempt. - You could even forgo the PAT attempt until play resumes.
OR... make it a rule that the refs / booth / whomever / must call a brief "official timeout" to at the very least inform the crowd and both teams that "lighting has been detected inside 16 miles of the stadium and is headed this way..." - Sort of like a sideline warning. That way, a team can at least try to hurry up and score if they clearly have the momentum. - That seems much more fair to me than just abruptly stopping play with no warning.
Had he gone to Tuscaloosa, he might very well be facing the same issue he currently has at Clemron.
If they all have to get paid, that requirement can be met by paying everybody the same (call it scholarship money 
) and we can eliminate the bidding wars and jumping ship for more money and it becomes a team loyalty attraction again instead of $$$$$.
Why it was allowed to get this out of hand and become the circus that it is I do not understand.
All sports do not have to be professional sports!
) and we can eliminate the bidding wars and jumping ship for more money and it becomes a team loyalty attraction again instead of $$$$$.Why it was allowed to get this out of hand and become the circus that it is I do not understand.
All sports do not have to be professional sports!
I like it.If they all have to get paid, that requirement can be met by paying everybody the same (call it scholarship money
Why it was allowed to get this out of hand and become the circus that it is I do not understand.
All sports do not have to be professional sports!
The refs make those decisions based on conference rules. There is no conspiracy.
But someone has to tell the refs there's lightning being reported 8 miles away?
There's always a conspiracy to cheat at Clem-Ron. Always.
NCAA D-II (maybe), D-III, and the NAIA.If they all have to get paid, that requirement can be met by paying everybody the same (call it scholarship money
Why it was allowed to get this out of hand and become the circus that it is I do not understand.
All sports do not have to be professional sports!
Latest
-
01
TheBigSpur Football
South Carolina Football Burning Questions: Alabama Week
-
02
GamecockCentral Football
What's working and not working for South Carolina through three games?
-
03
GamecockCentral Football
Wednesdays with Wes: What's different about this year's offense?
-
04
GamecockCentral Football
South Carolina offense looking 'to be able to go finish' drives with touchdowns, not field goals
-
05
GamecockCentral Football
Two probable, one doubtful on Wednesday South Carolina availability report