#13 Pre-Season Coaches Poll

Cobie

Junior
Jul 2, 2025
533
236
43
You are delusional if you think a big money program would throw huge money at a coach with a losing conference record and .568 overall winning percentage and not even having won his division regardless of what his name was. Skip Holtz had a better winning percentage than that after four seasons (.584) and a 3-0 bowl record at La Tech and I don't remember A&M, UGA or even Carolina throwing big money at him to try and get him in spite of his last name.

You seem to overlook the fact that the only reason Beamer was hired was because of his last name. How many other position coaches did Carolina offer the head coaching job to?

You're totally lost Piscis BOT. This is Watson-level material.

Botman needs to tweak you smarter if you're going to play the antagonist all season.
 

Piscis

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2001
24,196
1,705
113
You're totally lost Piscis BOT. This is Watson-level material.

Botman needs to tweak you smarter if you're going to play the antagonist all season.
Excellent retort based on facts, oh wait! I guess calling anyone who points out your foolishness a BOT is your version of calling anyone who isn't a sunshine pumper a tater.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blues man

kidrobinski

Senior
Jul 27, 2004
1,025
902
113
Remember, your talking to someone who doesn't think we landed on the moon. 🙂
I’d say a more accurate description of who he’s talking to is a guy that’s been around and knows the game. Wish there were more on this board and on social media in general; I don’t have the energy to suffer fools any longer but I would enjoy discussions with rational folks that know what they’re talking about. I’ll bet more would as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cobie

Gamecock Jacque

Joined Dec 20, 2020
Jan 30, 2022
5,228
4,923
113
I’d say a more accurate description of who he’s talking to is a guy that’s been around and knows the game. Wish there were more on this board and on social media in general; I don’t have the energy to suffer fools any longer but I would enjoy discussions with rational folks that know what they’re talking about. I’ll bet more would as well.
Ok. I will add you to the list of moon landing deniers. 🙂
 

Lurker123

All-Conference
May 4, 2020
5,002
4,123
113
Nah, I watched it live, did my senior paper on it, and have researched both it and its background pretty extensively. Take more than flat earthers to dissuade me.

And yet the guy you say "knows what hes talking about" does in fact think the moon landing was faked.

Granted, I dont think he really believes it, but it gets responses, which is all he's after.
 

Lurker123

All-Conference
May 4, 2020
5,002
4,123
113
Excellent retort based on facts, oh wait! I guess calling anyone who points out your foolishness a BOT is your version of calling anyone who isn't a sunshine pumper a tater.

This is an old shtick from the now defunct rivals board. Anyone who doesn't buy his trolling is suddenly a bot version of me, or kingward, or stock, or Jacque. I guess we can add you to the list of people who are me.

Congratulations.
 

kidrobinski

Senior
Jul 27, 2004
1,025
902
113
And yet the guy you say "knows what hes talking about" does in fact think the moon landing was faked.

Granted, I dont think he really believes it, but it gets responses, which is all he's after.
The thread was on football, as was my post. What anyone thinks about the moon landing in the context of football is of no concern to me.
 

Gamecock Jacque

Joined Dec 20, 2020
Jan 30, 2022
5,228
4,923
113
Nah, I watched it live, did my senior paper on it, and have researched both it and its background pretty extensively. Take more than flat earthers to dissuade me.
Then please explain that to Cobie Jr. who was the person I was referring to in my reply to Fish that you quoted. 🙏 He also put down people with degrees until ONE DAY, while appealing to authority to boost an argument, suddenly not only did he have a degree but of course one from Carolina. We all know someone like that, right? I bet the inability to repost hundreds of X political posts on here is killing him. 🙂
 

Lurker123

All-Conference
May 4, 2020
5,002
4,123
113
The thread was on football, as was my post. What anyone thinks about the moon landing in the context of football is of no concern to me.

By all means, go for it. Without the political threads, it'll just take longer to pick up on the shtick. It'll come though. The minute you realize youre being strung along solely for responses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gamecock stock

Cobie

Junior
Jul 2, 2025
533
236
43
And yet the guy you say "knows what hes talking about" does in fact think the moon landing was faked.

Granted, I dont think he really believes it, but it gets responses, which is all he's after.

Now you're just making things up. I once stating there was an interesting counternarrative to the moon landing and people had written books about it.

It speaks volumes that you have to reach for something like this to in attempt to make a point.

Sorry to blow up your multi-BOT charade Botman but it gets old -- and it's creepy. :)
 

bayrooster

All-American
Aug 21, 2003
14,811
7,454
113
I can remember when this thread was about the first 2025 Coaches Poll.
Aaah, Good Times
Those were the days..
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Harvard Gamecock