Its of my opinion. That if the QB play gets better we can hide a lot of other deficiencies. Woodson threw for 1600 yrds 6td 6int went 3-8 in 2005. Stumbled through the first half of 2006, got bewt down by lsu, then it suddenly clicked for him and uk took off... and a coach that was 5 games from being fired looked like a genius.
If barker could figure it out he could really hide some sucky o line play and help the offense keep the ball longer. Open up the run game. Put the other D on its heels. Keep our d fresh into the 4th quarter. Keep us in games. Which keeps motivation and confidence high. Its a domino effect.
2nd thought. Unrelated to the first. If we canned stoops and just refused to pay his full buyout how likely is it we settle for a lesser amount and soften the financial blow? I feel like this has happened at other schools, no? I may be wrong.
If barker could figure it out he could really hide some sucky o line play and help the offense keep the ball longer. Open up the run game. Put the other D on its heels. Keep our d fresh into the 4th quarter. Keep us in games. Which keeps motivation and confidence high. Its a domino effect.
2nd thought. Unrelated to the first. If we canned stoops and just refused to pay his full buyout how likely is it we settle for a lesser amount and soften the financial blow? I feel like this has happened at other schools, no? I may be wrong.