Man up and state what you consider acceptable. Evading the issue by being an *** might impress the moron cohort, but everyone else knopws you are stupid and gutless.
So, what is it for you?
I say 9-4, but I expected that the idiots would be afraid to put down any number because in their tender little hearts they know that any number the put down that isn't pathetically low for WVU risks committing to a standard they don't think Dana can meet.
I have no idea what you are talking about with "attempt at Huggins." I'm pretty sure none you idiots are Huggins.
as its been stated several times; 7-9 wins will be par for this program in the big 12. Occasionally we might do better, 10 wins once or twice a decade. Nothing wrong with that. This is not the big east anymore. The standards have changed due to conference change.Man up and state what you consider acceptable. Evading the issue by being an *** might impress the moron cohort, but everyone else knopws you are stupid and gutless.
So, what is it for you?
I say 9-4, but I expected that the idiots would be afraid to put down any number because in their tender little hearts they know that any number the put down that isn't pathetically low for WVU risks committing to a standard they don't think Dana can meet.
I have no idea what you are talking about with "attempt at Huggins." I'm pretty sure none you idiots are Huggins.
No, I'm not. You are perfectly free to be a pathetic wimp and there is absolutely nothing I can do about it.
Congratulations.
You know, while this may be impossible for you, there are people who can think longer term and short term at the same time.
I just am interested in how low expectations have fallen.
I'd counter with those that love the school are the ones who disapprove of its coach performing woefully by any metric conceivable by man.
Those so infatuated with the coach they'd rather see the program mired in underachieving mediocrity than admit their crush caused them to misjudge the coach are the ones who don't really support the program.
Just curious, Chris...what is your reasoning for that given the number of key defensive players who are graduating?The 2016 defense should a top 3 unit in the conference
Considering we saw that continue all through the season with no change, I wouldn't count on any improvement until we actually see it.while the offense should be improved - if the play calling is better and Howard makes better decisions on third downs. For example, stop trying to throw a low percentage 50-yard bomb on 3rd and 5 when six yards will move the chains.
I'm crushed, but find it odd that someone who virtually squeals "personal insult, personal insult" like Gomer Pyle when he gets mocked would stoop so low.
Considering some of them don't appear to be especially gifted physically, I thought they did OK. Kwiatkowski is certainly a loss.Quite honestly, I wasn't always impressed by some of our senior LBs this season.
There isn't one person here "infatuated" with the coach or that has a crush on him. What we have are realists-that understand the difficulties WVU's athletics are facing in the new power conference home and don't want to blow it all up because things aren't tremendous overnight. And then we have ignorance driven clowns that ignore all the massive changes WVU has seen over the last several years, post 50,000 threads on their same "get Holgorsen at any cost and destroy the WVU program" agenda, derail everyone else's posts and ruin message boards because even though they don't support the program or even realize WVU is still playing THIS season, until the program is ruined they are determined not to stop with their self serving childish behavior.
as its been stated several times; 7-9 wins will be par for this program in the big 12. Occasionally we might do better, 10 wins once or twice a decade. Nothing wrong with that. This is not the big east anymore. The standards have changed due to conference change.
Their are no standards. Whatever Dana manages is either the greatest coaching job in history or someone else's fault. Haven't you learned anything about this board? As long as we beat Kansas and Iowa State in conference Dana is the man. If only because we cant raise the money to fire him!
I'm cool with 7-5 or 8-4.
Let me guess, OP "doesn't accept mediocrity." I hear many of your type say that, yet you are overweight, live in a run down apartment, and can't pay your child support, but a football team losing a game is unacceptable.
And you want this opinion to be taken seriously?
Was this necessary? Come on. You don't know the guy, yet you attack him personally? I thought you were above this? Guess not. This board has gone to the sh!tter fast. And it's all because people are cool with 4-7 wins per season, a bowl game against lower level major conference teams, and no improvement at key positions. I'm not against Holgerson, I'm not for him. I'm for WVU having the killer instinct and attitude they once had. Even if we may not get there, accepting mediocrity (which is what I call 4-8, 5-7, 6-6, 7-5), even in a difficult conference, is not what the state of WV and native WVians are about. We've always been talked about, underdogs, etc. What I've always loved about MY state is that we shrug those off, shrug off the excuses (all you guys' "reasons" why we can't be better), and get the job done and prove people wrong.
Sorry for my rant, but it just pisses me off to see people get attacked personally because they want to see WVU achieve a little more. Nothing wrong with that.
The constant negativity gets old when people make post after post saying the exact same ****. They love to ramble on about how they don't settle for mediocrity, but all that says to me is that they live mediocre lives and live vicariously through a football team comprised of teenagers they have never met.
When in doubt, attack someone's verbal and grammar skills! If you don't care about the success of WVU athletics, why the hell do you even get on here?
I care for their success. My life just doesn't change whether our football team is 7-5 or 10-2 and when a decision is made about the future of Dana at WVU, it won't be because of anything I wrote on a message board. I care about the success of the whole university. You'd be surprised to learn WVU has a bunch of classrooms, desks, labs, libraries, dorms, ect. Lots of students don't even play sports, go figure.
We ALL live vicariously through WVU football and basketball. If you didn't, then why do you post on here so frequently? Since you analyze the behavior of the OP, let me analyze you. What you posting on here tells me is that you live vicariously through WVU football, and when times are good you are "up", and when times are bad you want things to change. I seem to remember a post not too long ago where you were questioning Holgerson's abilities and even said a change was needed. Hmmm......
But....yeah.....only the OP lives "vicariously" through WVU athletics......
One who strives for excellence will persevere over one who accepts mediocrity and worries about proper grammar
One who strives for excellence will persevere over one who accepts mediocrity and worries about proper grammar
Speak for yourself. College sports are a fun hobby and can serve as a useful escape from the everyday grind but some of us aren't trying to relive their high school glory days on the field.
For me, the athletic programs simply serve as a vehicle to remain connected to the university, a place I really care about, and allow me opportunities to maintain old relationships. I always want the teams to do well, mostly for the players, staff and students - but their successes don't impact my life.
the OP is correct. Following WVU should be a hobby. No grown man/women should ever live vicariously through a bunch of teenage student athletes. If so, I would question their maturity level and low self esteem as an adult.Then, stop posting about WVU sports or commenting towards others who do post about WVU sports. Go find an academic message board and discuss the classrooms, tables, chairs, books, etc. there. This is a SPORTS message board. It's easy for someone to hide behind the "I'm all about the welfare of the university" statements when times aren't very good. Then when times are great, that same someone becomes superfan #1. Go figure....