Toggle sidebar

3 times

7

79eer

Junior
Oct 4, 2008
8,544
394
83

AG Barr testifies that 3 times Mueller “emphatically stating” “BUT if not for the OLC opinion, he WOULD have found obstruction” (unable to indict a sitting president) and that it was NOT the basis for his decision. Barr uses the terms “we”, “us”, and “our” when Mueller was being interviewed, intimating that Barr was not the only person present from the DOJ when the interview took place with Mueller. (Certainly to verify and witness exactly what was said)
(Within the first 2 minutes of the video)
................... ANY reasonable, objective, unbiased individual can not possibly view both the Barr testimony and Mueller’s latest press conference and come to any other reasonable conclusion other than someone is UNDENIABLY LYING. To do otherwise is simply denying the obvious testimony. Guessing we will be hearing from the Barr and or his associates in the near future concerning the latest Mueller Dog & Pony Show.
 
Last edited:
7

79eer

Junior
Oct 4, 2008
8,544
394
83
Major Report Omission Shows Mueller Was Either Incompetent Or A Political Hack
Not once does Robert Mueller mention an investigation into whether Russia interfered with the presidential election by feeding dossier author Christopher Steele misinformation.
By Margot Cleveland

Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s March “Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election” contains a glaring omission: Not once in the 448-page tome does Mueller mention an investigation into whether Russia interfered with the U.S. presidential election by feeding dossier author Christopher Steele misinformation.

But Mueller also did not charge Steele with lying to the FBI, or refer a criminal case against Steele to federal prosecutors, as he did when the special counsel uncovered evidence of criminal misconduct unrelated to the 2016 election. Given Mueller’s conclusion that no one connected to the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to interfere with the election, one of those two scenarios must be true—either Russia fed Steele disinformation or Steele lied to the FBI about his Russian sources.
........ How about both, AN INCOMPETENT POLITICAL HACK?
 
M

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
79eer said:
Major Report Omission Shows Mueller Was Either Incompetent Or A Political Hack
Not once does Robert Mueller mention an investigation into whether Russia interfered with the presidential election by feeding dossier author Christopher Steele misinformation.
By Margot Cleveland

Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s March “Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election” contains a glaring omission: Not once in the 448-page tome does Mueller mention an investigation into whether Russia interfered with the U.S. presidential election by feeding dossier author Christopher Steele misinformation.

But Mueller also did not charge Steele with lying to the FBI, or refer a criminal case against Steele to federal prosecutors, as he did when the special counsel uncovered evidence of criminal misconduct unrelated to the 2016 election. Given Mueller’s conclusion that no one connected to the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to interfere with the election, one of those two scenarios must be true—either Russia fed Steele disinformation or Steele lied to the FBI about his Russian sources.
........ How about both, AN INCOMPETENT POLITICAL HACK?
Click to expand...
LOL smh
 
B

bamaEER

Freshman
May 29, 2001
32,435
60
0
countryroads89 said:
The stupidity of the right wingers on this board is amazing.
Click to expand...
I'm paying less and less attention to them by the day. Mueller is a straight shooter with no political motive and Congress now needs to move this forward. Let Biff's minions piss and moan about Mueller all they want.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom