43 total bowl games. 125 division 1 teams

WildcatofNati

Heisman
Mar 31, 2009
8,183
12,420
0
So 86 out of the 125 teams get to go to the postseason LOL. Think that number is a tad bit high don't you?
Bowl games need to be reduced down till probably about 16. Make it something you really got to achieve to get.
Many fans make this argument and I have never understood it. To me, the large number of bowl game is an increased opportunity to watch more football.
 

Kai Slater

All-American
Jan 30, 2015
1,762
5,710
0
With having so many silly, cheap bowl games, I kinda like some of the creative, funny names for the bowl games. They try hard to hype up the San Diego Credit Union Bowl, or Billy Joe's Auto Parts Bowl, etc....
 

3236

All-Conference
Dec 12, 2003
6,758
3,458
77
Just to compare….

The 1977 UK team wasn’t bowl eligible but I went back to that season to see how the cf world operated.

UK’s non conference schedule:
@Baylor, NC, WVU, @Penn St, VaTech

Only 13 bowl games and no mac teams to pad wins with. Only 2 SEC teams got in bowls, bama and lsu who were both top 20. UK would have if eligible. To compare current bowl streaks and regular season win targets to anything historically would be absurd
 

UKWildcats1987

Heisman
Sep 9, 2021
18,162
30,556
113
I think so. Bowl games for 7-5 and 6-6 teams are trash.

Agreed. Have a real post season. I'd go to 24 team playoff and then you can keep the cupcake who cares bowl games as well for those team's fans and your fanatic college football fan that would watch paint dry as long as you said it's football type.
 

maysvilleky

All-American
Aug 13, 2003
15,769
5,109
0
So 86 out of the 125 teams get to go to the postseason LOL. Think that number is a tad bit high don't you?
Bowl games need to be reduced down till probably about 16. Make it something you really got to achieve to get.
I think things will change. But as long as sponsors are willing to play, I’m for UK participating when invited. The players get some gifts as a reward so I’m ok with it. Before NIL it’s about all they could get.
 

3236

All-Conference
Dec 12, 2003
6,758
3,458
77
I think things will change. But as long as sponsors are willing to play, I’m for UK participating when invited. The players get some gifts as a reward so I’m ok with it. Before NIL it’s about all they could get.
I’m totally ok with it I just don’t think terms like ‘longest bowl streak’ and all that really as weight. I mean that’s only referencing the last 20 years of history being similar to today, if that.
 

3236

All-Conference
Dec 12, 2003
6,758
3,458
77
When I was a kid growing up back in the 70s there was what maybe 10-12 bowl games??!!
See my post above. 13 in ‘77. And that’s not adding on separate games for playoff teams.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bluedog79

3236

All-Conference
Dec 12, 2003
6,758
3,458
77
I think one of the silliest things is they give extra practice time for bowl teams but not other teams. Just give everybody 2 weeks of practice time before mid Jan regardless and call it Winter practice. Then they can come back in the spring.
 

Shydog

Heisman
Sep 11, 2013
6,718
10,734
113
I watch a lot of the Bowl games, I mean a LOT of them. if someone thinks they are meaningless and don't care to watch that doesn't bother me but most of the participants don't seem to think that way! generally, as long as the games stay reasonably close I see players busting their butts to win/compete!
 

NoDef

All-American
Sep 1, 2001
5,057
6,938
0
Yet some of our fans think going to a bowl game is a monumental accomplishment!
It all changed in 2006 when the NCAA added an extra cupcake game. It basically let P-5 programs start the season 3-0. We had went to a bowl game 5 out of 7 years before Stoops arrived.
Just to compare….

The 1977 UK team wasn’t bowl eligible but I went back to that season to see how the cf world operated.

UK’s non conference schedule:
@Baylor, NC, WVU, @Penn St, VaTech

Only 13 bowl games and no mac teams to pad wins with. Only 2 SEC teams got in bowls, bama and lsu who were both top 20. UK would have if eligible. To compare current bowl streaks and regular season win targets to anything historically would be absurd
The OOC got much easier after the Mumme years. We dropped Indiana which was a 50/50 win loss and replaced it with an automatic win. I couldn't tell you how many years we went into the UT game needed to beat them for the sixth win when we only played 11 games. Now we play 12 and we dropped Indiana. That's like having two free wins compared to past years..
 

VaxxedObamaCat

All-American
Aug 1, 2022
1,933
6,551
0
Because most fans aren't football fans, they don't care when it ends. Those fans that love and understand the sport love this time of year.
This is a BS argument. “If you don’t agree with me you’re not a real fan.” Watching a bunch of ****** 6-6 and 7-5 teams play in a meaningless bowl game that has no impact on any championship or prestige is not the measuring stick. They’re bad and mediocre teams. Glad they enjoy them but I’d prefer to watch the better teams play.

It’s the NIT for football simply cause a sponsor pays for it. That’s it.
 
Sep 20, 2021
296
507
0
This is a BS argument. “If you don’t agree with me you’re not a real fan.” Watching a bunch of ****** 6-6 and 7-5 teams play in a meaningless bowl game that has no impact on any championship or prestige is not the measuring stick. They’re bad and mediocre teams. Glad they enjoy them but I’d prefer to watch the better teams play.

It’s the NIT for football simply cause a sponsor pays for it. That’s it.
Tell that to the players, who bust their ***.
 

The-Hack

Heisman
Oct 1, 2016
24,463
42,984
0
As a fan, it’s pointless and not interesting. There’s a reason why you want to watch the NCAA tourney games over the CBI.
I haven’t watched an NCAA tourney game in three years.

If it (Minor bowls) were “non-interesting” they would lose money and not have sponsors, and would disappear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: John Henry

Kommonwealth

Senior
Oct 7, 2010
5,236
476
0
So 86 out of the 125 teams get to go to the postseason LOL. Think that number is a tad bit high don't you?
Bowl games need to be reduced down till probably about 16. Make it something you really got to achieve to get.
Bowl games are not based on accomplishment and the principle of achievement....at least not since the early 2000s....its about the money.

I dont have a problem with all the games though. I enjoy watching them around Christmas and it gives us a chance to watch our team one more time.
 
Last edited:

PushupMan

All-American
May 29, 2001
168,466
8,710
93
There are 131 football programs in the FBS, 130 of which are eligible for bowl games. James Madison is the newest and is transitioning, so not eligible yet this year.

ACC 14

SEC 14 (28)

Big Ten 14 (42)

Big XII 10 (52)

PAC-12 12 (64)

Ind 7 (71)

AAC 11 (82)

CUSA 11 (93)

MAC 12 (105)

Mountain West 12 (117)

Sun Belt 14 (131)

Also, 43 bowl games counts the national championship game, so really only 84 teams get bowl bids, not 86.
 
Last edited:

Deeeefense

Heisman
Staff member
Aug 22, 2001
44,024
50,852
113
Who cares if every team goes to a bowl? Bowls are simply meaningless exhibition games but they add entertainment for people wanting to watch football, and they extend the season for teams, and reward them with a trip. I enjoy watching bowls and wagering on the outcome.

The only bowls that have true relevance in defining the best team is the championship series.
 

akaukswoosh

Hall of Famer
Jan 14, 2006
78,926
120,518
93
So 86 out of the 125 teams get to go to the postseason LOL. Think that number is a tad bit high don't you?
Bowl games need to be reduced down till probably about 16. Make it something you really got to achieve to get.
That's been an issue for a looong time.
 

VaxxedObamaCat

All-American
Aug 1, 2022
1,933
6,551
0
almost as bad as KHSAA football playoffs.
Six classes for our state’s population is an absolute joke. Having 32 teams for a playoff in each class is a giant waste of time. It’s the same exact teams every year.

Consolidate some of these classes and get back to four divisions.