62,000 Iraqis fighting along side U.S. troops now in limbo.

WVMade

Redshirt
Aug 23, 2016
1,221
0
0
“We are not clear where are the boundaries in the U.S. and their relationship to Iraq. Last week, they were talking about oil, now they are talking about banning Iraqis,” says Faily. “In the executive order, it talks about 9/11, there is no association of 9/11 with Iraq. It is unjust and unfairness. Iraqis feel they are being betrayed.”

Trump is heading down the wrong path, one that has left a feeling of mistrust in Baghdad and reminders of the U.S. troop withdrawal in 2011. It could ultimately force Iraq to deal with the threat of ISIS on its own, he says.

“In 2011, U.S. troops left without defending Iraq, now these actions are similarly considered by the Iraqis as the U.S. not being a reliable partner. These steps are targeted at the wrong people. It’s propaganda,” he says. “We don’t want to [fight ISIS] alone, but, if we have to, then unfortunately that’s a step we have to take.”
 

TarHeelEer

Redshirt
Dec 15, 2002
89,286
37
48
“We are not clear where are the boundaries in the U.S. and their relationship to Iraq. Last week, they were talking about oil, now they are talking about banning Iraqis,” says Faily. “In the executive order, it talks about 9/11, there is no association of 9/11 with Iraq. It is unjust and unfairness. Iraqis feel they are being betrayed.”

Trump is heading down the wrong path, one that has left a feeling of mistrust in Baghdad and reminders of the U.S. troop withdrawal in 2011. It could ultimately force Iraq to deal with the threat of ISIS on its own, he says.

“In 2011, U.S. troops left without defending Iraq, now these actions are similarly considered by the Iraqis as the U.S. not being a reliable partner. These steps are targeted at the wrong people. It’s propaganda,” he says. “We don’t want to [fight ISIS] alone, but, if we have to, then unfortunately that’s a step we have to take.”

It'll be ok snowflake. You need tucked in tonight?
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,692
1,764
113
“We are not clear where are the boundaries in the U.S. and their relationship to Iraq. Last week, they were talking about oil, now they are talking about banning Iraqis,” says Faily. “In the executive order, it talks about 9/11, there is no association of 9/11 with Iraq. It is unjust and unfairness. Iraqis feel they are being betrayed.”

Trump is heading down the wrong path, one that has left a feeling of mistrust in Baghdad and reminders of the U.S. troop withdrawal in 2011. It could ultimately force Iraq to deal with the threat of ISIS on its own, he says.

“In 2011, U.S. troops left without defending Iraq, now these actions are similarly considered by the Iraqis as the U.S. not being a reliable partner. These steps are targeted at the wrong people. It’s propaganda,” he says. “We don’t want to [fight ISIS] alone, but, if we have to, then unfortunately that’s a step we have to take.”
It's been said repeatedly on here by those on the left that nothing was wrong with the troop removal in 2011? I'm confused.

We have no intention of pulling out of Iraq. However, for the contractors supporting the US forces in Iraq, the Iraqis are currently talking about taking actions which will be akin to cutting off their nose to spite their face. I will say, having some pretty extensive dealings with the Arab culture, that's actually par for the course. They take insults to their core and dwell on that **** for generations.