If Judge gets 62 or more do you personally consider him the record holder?
Nitt1300 Heisman Nov 2, 2008 6,596 12,337 113 Oct 1, 2022 #1 If Judge gets 62 or more do you personally consider him the record holder?
LionJim Heisman Oct 12, 2021 13,518 18,810 113 Oct 1, 2022 #2 Nitt1300 said: If Judge gets 62 or more do you personally consider him the record holder? Click to expand... Wilt had 10,000. Reactions: cavic, Woodpecker, CVLion and 4 others
Nitt1300 said: If Judge gets 62 or more do you personally consider him the record holder? Click to expand... Wilt had 10,000.
E Erial_Lion All-Conference Nov 1, 2021 3,483 4,252 113 Oct 1, 2022 #3 I find it comical that we’ll have them keep cutting in for every at bat…hope it doesn’t happen during a key spot today Reactions: oldpsubear
I find it comical that we’ll have them keep cutting in for every at bat…hope it doesn’t happen during a key spot today
berklion Junior Jan 3, 2005 109 217 43 Oct 2, 2022 #4 Nope, most knew they were taking PED's and profited from it. Can't have it both ways. They hold the record. Off the top of my head, I can't remember if it's Bonds or McGwire that have the most. That's how badly MLB ruined that record.
Nope, most knew they were taking PED's and profited from it. Can't have it both ways. They hold the record. Off the top of my head, I can't remember if it's Bonds or McGwire that have the most. That's how badly MLB ruined that record.
S saturdaysarebetter All-Conference Jun 19, 2018 948 1,383 111 Oct 2, 2022 #5 Nitt1300 said: If Judge gets 62 or more do you personally consider him the record holder? Click to expand... Yes Reactions: cavic and PSU1969A
Nitt1300 said: If Judge gets 62 or more do you personally consider him the record holder? Click to expand... Yes
91Joe95 All-Conference Aug 15, 2003 2,843 4,077 113 Oct 2, 2022 #6 I don't consider any Yankee to be the legitimate record holder given the ridiculous layout of their fields.
I don't consider any Yankee to be the legitimate record holder given the ridiculous layout of their fields.
Thorndike2021 All-Conference Mar 1, 2012 713 1,525 93 Oct 2, 2022 #7 He wouldn't be the 'record holder' so why would we consider him to be the 'record holder'?
Nitt1300 Heisman Nov 2, 2008 6,596 12,337 113 Oct 2, 2022 #8 Thorndike2021 said: He wouldn't be the 'record holder' so why would we consider him to be the 'record holder'? Click to expand... opinions vary personally, I would- apparently you wouldn't
Thorndike2021 said: He wouldn't be the 'record holder' so why would we consider him to be the 'record holder'? Click to expand... opinions vary personally, I would- apparently you wouldn't
