Committed today, good looking linebacker.
Allen Smith
- Thread starter rockycard
- Start date
Your teams two best players were very low rated, don’t get caught up chasing stars. The majority of our recruits have very nice offers.
Smith has offers from penn st, Nebraska, not too shabby.
We're IU. We are who we are. We get 3 star guys 90% of the time and when you bring in enough low rated players, some pan out.
But you're Louisville. The history. The program. Everything IU fans hope and dream of but may never get.
You should be getting 4 and 5 star caliber players. If you want to ever beat Clemson, you're going to have to bring in some players. Did you see what they did to Alabama! When can Satterfield begin to compete with that?
I thought you were a Kentucky fan.
I guarantee that next years class will be really good, too late of a start for this class.
He is a UK fan. It is jauk11. He is the ONLY person ANYWHERE who quotes the star ratings down to the tenths instead of just the number of stars. He is quite a maroon.
Last edited:
Sooner than UK will begin to compete with Alabama.
What is the difference between being a UK and an IU football fan? Even a “maroon” knows there is not a difference.
We have a LOT of company.
Right now there are probably 55-60 P5 schools who wonder how they will ever compete with Clemson and Alabama.
You just keep feedin’, trainin’, and coachin’.
Right now there are probably 55-60 P5 schools who wonder how they will ever compete with Clemson and Alabama.
You just keep feedin’, trainin’, and coachin’.
Tell jauk to go look up Rivals’ rating for Josh Allen and let us know whether he was closer to a 4-star or a 2-star when he signed with UK in 2015.
Just totally wrong...JJWeaver is a 5.8 4 star ranked 10th Best Weakside DE while Boykin is a 5.6 3 star ranked the 60th Weakside DE. where do you get this??
were pretty happy to Be UK football fans right now thanks. lots of young talent
The composite rankings have Boykin over 30 spots better, rivals rankings are garbage except for the obvious studs.
Is there anything more cliche than arguing about recruiting rankings? 60% of the very best players will turn out to be busts, while 1 out of 10 of the sleepers will turn out to be studs. Will Weaver, Boykin, neither or both turn out to be one of those 1 in 10? We will find out in 3, 4 or maybe 5 years....
Uh, Boykin is >8988 Weaver low 89...of course being a uk fan already proves you're too damn stupid to get it! I saw Weeber twice last season and was very underwhelmed. ***!
News for you..you are on a Rivals site cherry picking composite rankings to fit your agenda. Good luck with that...definitely worked out for your team last year and that blistering 88th ranked squad in this years class
Nah, I've been around for years. call it the way I see it and give credit where due. When UL was legit I said it. Lots of people have a very hard time accepting this isnt your dad's UK football program and that isnt likely to change dramatically. Historic investment in program/coaches and consistent recruiting with Stoops at about 25th to 30th in rankings is unprecedented. the mantra that last year was a fluke is just wishful thinking
You said the same thing years ago, disappeared, and returned this year.
Ha. Yeah, got that...so that makes 3(Rivals, Scout, 247).. and I think Rivals is by far the best. maybe you should be on the 247 board if those rankings are the gospel