So why does our coach think a guy who is still clearly hurt and limited by the injury and actually hurting our team when he’s on the court should play 19 minutes?
Some more minutes to Ansley would certainly have been justified. And your question is a reasonable one.
There are reasonable answer though:
A lot of Carr’s minutes came in the first half, in which Ansley only scored two points, those on free throws, missed his only fg attempt (a three), fouled a dude in the act of shooting, and played sometimes questionable defense.
A few of the games Carr blew up in, he started slow.
A lot of Carr’s minutes came in the second half, in which Ansley picked up two more fouls. The rate of 3 fouls in 22 minutes seems like a reason itself to steal him some bench time and protect his availability for game situations where he’s hot and you want to keep him in or where Carr’s back quits on him for good in a game or even where God forbid Williams and Garrison both foul out and we need some center minutes from him, which already happened this season.
Otherwise offered without interpretation. A lot of intuition was at play necessarily. Your take isn’t bad although man you need to address that foul situation especially when we face whistles like tonight’s. Pope’s take wasn’t bad either.