Toggle sidebar

And the Idiot of the Year Award Goes to

C

countryroads89_rivals

New member
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
mneilmont for this post:

"If you were not around during the time, you are going to lose a little appreciation of what she did. She had probably gone to the back of that bus a hundred times and pass up unoccupied seats. This time she said to hell with that and took the first unoccupied seat. There had never been a problem when she lowered her head and went to the back."

with regard to Rosa Parks.


Wow. Is there a way to get banned for that level of stupidity?

This post was edited on 3/31 3:28 PM by countryroads89
 
R

RichardPeterJohnson

New member
Dec 7, 2010
12,636
108
0
Keep in mind, he's the same guy who talked about my son....


fathering Black babies, said my son looked like a "***", and continues to disparage my cousins who are Black. The guy is a racist. Plain and simple.
 
M

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
Re: Keep in mind, he's the same guy who talked about my son....


Let me type this again. Obviously when I call you a lying son-of-a-***** now, I get blocked
 
M

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
Re: Keep in mind, he's the same guy who talked about my son....


NOPE, IT WAS WHEN I FINALLY AGREED WITH YOU THAT YOUR SON IS A ***. REPEATING, THERE IS NO WAY HE COULD HAVE BEEN ANYTHING ELSE. THAT IS THE FIRST TIME I HAVE USED THAT TERM ON THIS VENUE, BUT NOT THE LAST.
 
M

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
Re: Keep in mind, he's the same guy who talked about my son....


HE HAS GOT TO BE A ***. GOT TO BE SINCE HE IS THE SON OF THE THING THAT BRAGS ABOUT BEING A BIGGER COCK SUCKER THAN KNOX. BRAGS ABOUT SUCKING MORE AND A BETTER ONE.
 
M

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
Re: Keep in mind, he's the same guy who talked about my son....


Now, you have kept pressing until I agree with you that your son is a ***. Got.......

Does that make you feel better.
 
M

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
You probably need to look in the mirror


Too anxious to jump. What did I say objectionable?

Repeating: She walked to the back of the bus many times and there was no problem, but when she refused to go to the back of the bus, that raised a discrimination problem. You are a stupid idiot if you think differently or fail to understand the situation that existed at the time. Her actions were the front runner to remove the "Colored Only" and the "White Only" sign which were fashioned at the time.

Tell me specifically what you find objectionable to what I reported?
 
M

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
Re: Sounds reasonable to me**


He is a Triple Prick follower. It is always somebody else as culprit. He is insecure and trying to fit in.
 
M

Motown Mounty_rivals

New member
May 29, 2001
35,874
36
0
WTF is your problem?!? He was saluting her for what she did

on the other hand maybe you are a racist and you want him banned for speaking well of her is that what it is?

She always walked to the back of the bus so there was never a problem and one day she said to hell with that and she sat where she wanted. She wasn't going to lower her head and walk to the back anymore.

You are a freaking moron!
 
dave

dave

Well-known member
May 29, 2001
167,926
717
113
Re: WTF is your problem?!? He was saluting her for what she did

I think liberals are like pack dogs. The more you put together the more they bark.
 
W

WhiteTailEER

New member
Jun 17, 2005
11,534
170
0
You left out

"There had never been a problem when she lowered her head and went to the back."

That statement comes across as "everything was fine when they knew their place".

Now, he says that's not the way he meant it, so I'll take him at his word for that. It's easy to type something hastily and it gets inferred in a way that it wasn't intended. But I also won't fault anybody that inferred it that way either.

However, now that he has clarified, it seems something that should just be let go, but that wouldn't fit the culture of this board.
 
M

Motown Mounty_rivals

New member
May 29, 2001
35,874
36
0
It reads that way if you want it to read that way

It is an accurate statement. When I read it it meant that at that time there were no problems when the blacks did "as they were told".
 
R

RichardPeterJohnson

New member
Dec 7, 2010
12,636
108
0
Looks like someone was hitting the bottle pretty hard last night

 
W

WhiteTailEER

New member
Jun 17, 2005
11,534
170
0
No problems for the whites you mean

Originally posted by Motown Mounty:
there were no problems when the blacks did "as they were told".
Click to expand...
The experience was a bit difference for blacks, there were problems for them regardless.
 
C

countryroads89_rivals

New member
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
Re: You left out

Originally posted by WhiteTailEER:
"There had never been a problem when she lowered her head and went to the back."

That statement comes across as "everything was fine when they knew their place".
Click to expand...
That's the way I took it. If that's the way it was meant, I stand by my statement. It fits with the other statement about the lunch counter - "they can go somewhere else". If you really believe the "solution" was for them to go somewhere else, you really don't have a clue.

If it's not the way it was meant, I apologize and take back everything I said.
 
M

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
I can see where you are confused


Things have to be read into your offerings, according to what you suggested yesterday. Not saying that I always type what I intend without error, but for the most part you can take what I say at face value.

After reading my initial offering, I still do not see/get how you people got to your understanding. There was no place that I suggested that the back of the bus was where she belonged. It was simply a fact for the period. I DID NOT RELIGATE HER TO THE BACK OF THE BUS. I HAD ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. It was simply a fact for that period of time in our history.
 
M

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
Re: No problems for the whites you mean


How old were you in 1964? Did you hear someone lodge a complaint? I never did living in a metropolitan area in the South at the time.

I would get on the bus and have a seat and never think a thing about it. It was simply the way it was. Being new, I accepted it without question.
 
M

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
Re: Looks like someone was hitting the bottle pretty hard last night


Actually haven't had a drink in 5 years. Can you make the like statement that you have not ingested pain-killers or other narcotics? You are such a damn liar, it would be hard to believe you, but will give you a chance to deny.
 
W

WhiteTailEER

New member
Jun 17, 2005
11,534
170
0
Why are you constantly being a ... whatever the hell you are?

Originally posted by mneilmont:

Things have to be read into your offerings, according to what you suggested yesterday.
Click to expand...
I never said anything of the sort yesterday. I tried giving you the benefit of the doubt on this one and still you come back and prove that you're going to be contrarian regardless of what I say. Clearly you have issues.
 
W

WhiteTailEER

New member
Jun 17, 2005
11,534
170
0
So the Selma march was totally misundertood

Originally posted by mneilmont:

Did you hear someone lodge a complaint?
Click to expand...
It was not any kind of protest at all, it was just a Sunday stroll. Everybody was perfectly content with their role in society.
 
M

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
Maybe a day or two ago then


but you certainly said it. Contrarian? You respond to nearly everything I offer. It really isn't necessary for you to offer yourself as my conscious.

That ignore button works if you would do us both a favor.
 
M

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
Please re-read both entries


Challenge is for you to tie your response to my inquiry. Can't do it, huh?

Were you ever involved, outside a book that some other idiot wrote who didn't know what he was talking about either?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom