Another plane collision. This time in Arizona involving a parked jet this time

Cotaay

New member
Nov 29, 2020
421
1,203
0
Everything I’ve read from people who seem like they would know points to the helicopter pilot messing up unfortunately.

He doesn’t have a video up yet but there is a YouTuber named Pilot Debrief who does a great job breaking down what went wrong in crashes. He typically waits until the final reports come out, but I’m guessing he puts something out soon in this case. Really interested in hearing his take, former military pilot and seems to be as by the book as it gets.
 

KYWildCatsFan

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2017
5,690
12,082
98
I don’t think they were looking at that other flight that had just taken off. It was flying north after taking off from the north side of the main runway and would essentially be behind and to the right of the helicopter (that was toward the center or south side of the runway, based on flight path of incoming plane). Maybe they were looking at the next plane lined up on the main runway, but I doubt they were thinking it was the one that had already taken off on the other side of the airport.
This 100%. There’s zero chance the helicopter pilot mistakenly thought the departing plane was the traffic they were alerted to.

I’ve listened to the radio transmission from ATC. The first alert was “JA-25, traffic is just south of the Woodrow bridge, a CRJ, is 1,200 feet for runway 33”.

Then about 7 seconds later the controller clears AA1630(listening to the full recording, this is the last plane to depart before the crash so it has to be the departing plane in the picture) to lineup and wait on runway 1 and notifies that there is a CRJ(plane involved in crash) on a 6 mile final for 33. He is notifying him of this so they will be ready to take off once cleared as runway 1 and runway 33 are intersecting runways.

37 seconds later the controller clears AA1630 for takeoff on runway 1 no delay and notifies him that the CRJ is now on a 3 mile final for runway 33.

Then 52 seconds after the controller asks again if the helicopter has the CRJ in sight. Then tells the helicopter to pass behind the CRJ. I can’t tell you what the pilot of the helicopter said because for some reason on this recording I listened to, you cannot hear the helicopters transmissions. So don’t hear an answer back.

Then 20 seconds later you hear the audible gasps of the controllers in the background as they see the collision happen.

So to recap. The helicopter was first notified of the CRJ before the departing plane even took off. So there’s no way they mistook the departing plane in the picture as the alerted traffic since they weren’t even in the air yet. By the time they were asked again if they had the traffic in sight, the departing plane would have been basically at their 5 o’clock a mile or more away. There’s no way they would have been searching for traffic that far to their right.
 

TucsonCat

New member
Sep 10, 2022
2,807
3,423
0
Insinuating? Check yourself. Your post is off the rails.
The insinuation is very troubling:

President Donald Trump aired his thoughts about Wednesday night's plane collision near Reagan National Airport in a candid Truth Social post.

Writing early Thursday morning, Trump said that the crash "should have been prevented," and expressed concern over the incident.

"The airplane was on a perfect and routine line of approach to the airport," Trump wrote. "The helicopter was going straight at the airplane for an extended period of time."

"It is a CLEAR NIGHT, the lights on the plane were blazing, why didn’t the helicopter go up or down, or turn. Why didn’t the control tower tell the helicopter what to do instead of asking if they saw the plane. This is a bad situation that looks like it should have been prevented. NOT GOOD!!!"
 

Beatle Bum

Well-known member
Sep 1, 2002
39,206
57,734
113
So don't start insinuating there's more to story and spreading poorly sourced news.

Thats how murdered judges get their names drug through the mud with vile accusations.

To be sure, I did not insinuate anything in this thread. Nor did I drag a murdered judge’s name through the mud with Cole accusations.
 

sefus12

Well-known member
Dec 22, 2007
6,338
15,788
103
Like over Lake Barkley.
To be fair, Hegseth said that this was a routine annual certification practice, not necessarily straight training. Doesn’t sound like the folks on the helicopter were new to this route/scenario.
 

blw

New member
May 26, 2010
1,051
1,889
0
In a thread that already has said there were survivors and it was a police helicopter, we learn the value of only trusting respectable news services. Should only pay attention to aviation officials with first hand knowledge of what happened. Not randos screaming questions on the internet.
What are you saying is the poor news source? Trump himself, or are you saying that Trump was misquoted by Fox?
 
  • Like
Reactions: IkeCat

FltDoc

New member
Jan 4, 2003
1,993
1,851
0
Not going down a conspiracy rabbit hole, but one question that came to my mind once the official statements came out, is why are they doing military*training* flights in congested civilian airspace?

And anyone who's flown into or out of Reagan knows that takeoff and landing are a bit more involved than most U.S. airports.
Am making my way through the comments so if this has already been answered, sorry...

There are "several" military helicopter units that support the country in this area.... flying down the Potomac is very customary, and I'm sure those guys have made that flight many, many times. (its a very restricted airspace and requires a lot of training just to enter).

Procedures will be scrutinized, and maybe something will be changed as this was very tragic, but it's nothing more than a chain of errors which caused this tragedy -- not a "why are they flying there to begin with".
 

FltDoc

New member
Jan 4, 2003
1,993
1,851
0
33 is a very common runway for RJs. We used to have fun and keep it really tight over the water, but you’re allowed to be more conservative.

Definitely a chance the Helo guy had the wrong plane in sight to avoid. It was on him to stay out of the approach path.
Would bet my last nickle that both airplanes had traffic avoidance technology.... makes this even harder to accept....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tinker Dan

FltDoc

New member
Jan 4, 2003
1,993
1,851
0
This 100%. There’s zero chance the helicopter pilot mistakenly thought the departing plane was the traffic they were alerted to.

I’ve listened to the radio transmission from ATC. The first alert was “JA-25, traffic is just south of the Woodrow bridge, a CRJ, is 1,200 feet for runway 33”.

Then about 7 seconds later the controller clears AA1630(listening to the full recording, this is the last plane to depart before the crash so it has to be the departing plane in the picture) to lineup and wait on runway 1 and notifies that there is a CRJ(plane involved in crash) on a 6 mile final for 33. He is notifying him of this so they will be ready to take off once cleared as runway 1 and runway 33 are intersecting runways.

37 seconds later the controller clears AA1630 for takeoff on runway 1 no delay and notifies him that the CRJ is now on a 3 mile final for runway 33.

Then 52 seconds after the controller asks again if the helicopter has the CRJ in sight. Then tells the helicopter to pass behind the CRJ. I can’t tell you what the pilot of the helicopter said because for some reason on this recording I listened to, you cannot hear the helicopters transmissions. So don’t hear an answer back.

Then 20 seconds later you hear the audible gasps of the controllers in the background as they see the collision happen.

So to recap. The helicopter was first notified of the CRJ before the departing plane even took off. So there’s no way they mistook the departing plane in the picture as the alerted traffic since they weren’t even in the air yet. By the time they were asked again if they had the traffic in sight, the departing plane would have been basically at their 5 o’clock a mile or more away. There’s no way they would have been searching for traffic that far to their right.

Am agreeing with you high-hour pilots on everything.... but can't get over the fact that both aircraft probably had traffic avoidance technology. So whereas the helicopter was MOST responsible for this, the landing aircraft could have initiated a go-around as well...

In this case even if the landing jet was 98% procedure-perfect, everyone on his plane lost....

Also, makes me think that the helicopter was VFR which suggests a little different type of "spacing" between the two by ATC.

Someone help me here?
 

Mdnerd

New member
Apr 20, 2022
1,870
5,687
0
Would bet my last nickle that both airplanes had traffic avoidance technology.... makes this even harder to accept....
Can’t speak to the systems on the Blackhawk. The CRJ obviously has a TCAS, but the RA is inhibited at low altitudes. So they would have seen the target, but no altitude on it, and no alert from the TCAS. There is constant helicopter traffic in that area, so a low flying target on TCAS is an every approach event almost.

The question now is why was the Blackhawk so high? That corridor is limited to 200’ and below, but they were cruising over 300’. So he either had clearance or made a huge mistake. Either way, that question will be answered very soon.
 

Mdnerd

New member
Apr 20, 2022
1,870
5,687
0
Am agreeing with you high-hour pilots on everything.... but can't get over the fact that both aircraft probably had traffic avoidance technology. So whereas the helicopter was MOST responsible for this, the landing aircraft could have initiated a go-around as well...

In this case even if the landing jet was 98% procedure-perfect, everyone on his plane lost....

Also, makes me think that the helicopter was VFR which suggests a little different type of "spacing" between the two by ATC.

Someone help me here?
Helicopter was VFR, but above the corridor. They were also doing NVG training, which adds an extra layer to this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FltDoc

Deeeefense

Well-known member
Staff member
Aug 22, 2001
43,697
49,639
113
Would bet my last nickle that both airplanes had traffic avoidance technology.... makes this even harder to accept....
T-Cass usually doesn't work that close to the ground as the ground produces too many targets. Anyway this was under VFR conditions and the chopper pilot acknowledged having visual on incoming traffic, so it doesn't really matter, especially since they had night vision equipment. IMO either the chopper pilot forgot AA1630 had been re-rerouted for 33 instead of 1 which took him further to the East, or he thought he was further south than he was where he could fly underneath the inbound.
 
Last edited:

sefus12

Well-known member
Dec 22, 2007
6,338
15,788
103
Ahh I see. Thought you were a pilot.
Oh no. I watched those flight patterns daily for years as we walked our dogs and wondered around Old Town. And then flew a lot out of/into Reagan. That’s all.
 

CondorCat

New member
Oct 22, 2010
2,012
1,888
0
"It was a very experienced group," said Jonathan Koziol, a retired Army chief warrant officer with more than 30 years experience in flying Army helicopters. Koziol has been attached to the Unified Command Post created at Reagan National Airport to coordinate efforts following the deadly collision.

Koziol, confirmed to reporters on a conference call that the male instructor pilot had more than 1,000 hours of flight time, the female pilot who was commanding the flight at the time had more than 500 hours of flight time, and the crew chief was also said to have hundreds of hours of flight time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deeeefense

Beatle Bum

Well-known member
Sep 1, 2002
39,206
57,734
113
An updated story says that skater was supposed to be booked to ATL, not DCA but couldn’t fly because of his dog’s size. Still unnerving though.

Did not see that. I believe the skating duo husband and wife sent the son the day before. Is that still part of the narrative?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wodie sloot

christophero

Well-known member
May 2, 2017
16,616
19,981
113
Terrible all around. Someone messed up really bad. If my family were on that plane and I would be furious and would probably fly to DC to demand answers. Hard to determine what is true but I heard audio of the tower repeatedly telling the chopper to turn around and return to base. I've heard it's hard to see at night with all the city lights. If that is true why is a helicopter flying a training mission through runway space in an urban area like that?
 

berniecarbo

Well-known member
Apr 29, 2020
4,792
27,343
113
I am reading (no personal knowledge) that on most night vision Blackhawk flights there for safety reasons are two crew chiefs and this one was missing a crew chief on the left side.
 
  • Like
Reactions: christophero

GrandePdre

New member
Jan 21, 2008
17,126
6,634
0
It sounds like the Blackhawk pilot was incredibly lax and possibly distracted in flight. Fast and loose with his path and altitude. Possibly some chatter between the soldiers. That would seem to be the most likely reason why it was off path and too high.

Not sure how the military or the new Defense Secretary handles this, but I would assume some heads will roll. Whole lot of lawsuits are being readied against the Army (likely most culpable), the airport (slightly culpable ) and maybe American Airlines (least culpable but pick pockets). I'm sure the victims' families have already been peppered with lawyers wanting a piece of this litigation.

Just very sad and completely preventable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: christophero

JumperJack

New member
Oct 30, 2002
21,997
65,619
0
Terrible all around. Someone messed up really bad. If my family were on that plane and I would be furious and would probably fly to DC to demand answers. Hard to determine what is true but I heard audio of the tower repeatedly telling the chopper to turn around and return to base. I've heard it's hard to see at night with all the city lights. If that is true why is a helicopter flying a training mission through runway space in an urban area like that?
It’s absurd that any kind of training like that was being conducted in that area. Especially after reading about how easy it would be to confuse background lights with landing lights, etc. Especially after reading that all these people have said for years that this airport is super crowded anyway. And on and on.

Somebody at some point never questioned it?
 

mash_24

Well-known member
Sep 26, 2011
7,945
24,319
108
No name for the 3rd Blackhawk pilot? Only that it was a female. Fair to assume she was flying the chopper?
 

TortElvisII

Active member
May 7, 2010
51,232
96,195
66
That Philadelphia crash is wild.

Looks like a missile.
 
Last edited:

Deeeefense

Well-known member
Staff member
Aug 22, 2001
43,697
49,639
113
It was reported the chopper broke altitude by 100 feet. That doesn't necessarily point to pilot error though, it could be debris in the static line or other reasons for the altimeter to read off a bit. At any rate the latest video I saw on the news shows the chopper flying right into the flight path of the CRJ apparently not even seeing it. There was a larger jet on approach that had brighter landing lights and could very well have been confused for the CRJ.
 

sefus12

Well-known member
Dec 22, 2007
6,338
15,788
103
It was reported the chopper broke altitude by 100 feet. That doesn't necessarily point to pilot error though, it could be debris in the static line or other reasons for the altimeter to read off a bit. At any rate the latest video I saw on the news shows the chopper flying right into the flight path of the CRJ apparently not even seeing it. There was a larger jet on approach that had brighter landing lights and could very well have been confused for the CRJ.
The Helo pilot would likely have seen 3 or 4 planes lined u down the Potomac coming into Reagan. But he would never be circling behind those airplanes at an altitude anywhere close to them. The ONLY way he’d need to be cautious of an airplane when flying southward down that East bank is if it’s a plane lining up to land on runway 33. It sounds like a very awful error by the Helo pilot. There’s just no other way he’d be told to hold course (south on east bank of river) and go behind the incoming plane. If a plane is landing on the main runway, it’s coming right down the river (center/west half or bank)) to land.