Poster under the handle "Juice" was telling us this 5 years ago. Not many wanted to listen. Who's laughing now?
He wasnt the only one.
Poster under the handle "Juice" was telling us this 5 years ago. Not many wanted to listen. Who's laughing now?
Spurrier was 4 games over .500 in conference play and quit mid season, Holtz had an overall losing record and was 10 games UNDER .500 in SEC play. Neither one ever made it to a major bowl game.
No doubt they were the best at SC, and that is sort of sad.
I think it's tied up in just a small number of players.We are spending more than UGA. We are spending more than Clemson. There is no reason we shouldn't be able to win with the right coaching staff building the right culture. I just hasn't been done with any regularity.
2 years ago, Beamer was the right coach with the right staff building the right culture. We were playoff bound in 2025, Sellers was a Heisman favorite and a number one draft pick, Harbor was going to be a superstar WR and Stewart was high first round.We are spending more than UGA. We are spending more than Clemson. There is no reason we shouldn't be able to win with the right coaching staff building the right culture. I just hasn't been done with any regularity.
I am guessing these STARS came out of HIGH School better coached and prepared than they are now, No other reason IMO..2 years ago, Beamer was the right coach with the right staff building the right culture. We were playoff bound in 2025, Sellers was a Heisman favorite and a number one draft pick, Harbor was going to be a superstar WR and Stewart was high first round.
Did Beamer forget how to coach?
Oh my what this squad would give to be 5-7?? I see 4 wins (right now) at best, and that includes getting one this Sat.Let's be realistic.
Neither Holtz nor Spurrier were able to sustain their OWN success.
Holtz peaked in his 3rd year and declined back to middling his final 3 years. Peaked at an end of season AP #13 in the 3rd year.
Spurrier peaked in years 5-7 at 11-2 and a post season AP #4 in year 7, and declined to p--- poor his final season.
Holtz delined to 5-7, 5-7 and 6-5
Spurrier declined to 7-6 and 3-9 (but his record that last year was 2-4 because he quit after 6 games.)
There are lots of garnet colored glasses looking in garnet tinted rear view mirrors among gamecock fans. Unfortunately, unlike the stock market, past results do, indeed, seem to guarantee future performance in gamecock football.Let's be realistic.
Neither Holtz nor Spurrier were able to sustain their OWN success.
Holtz peaked in his 3rd year and declined back to middling his final 3 years. Peaked at an end of season AP #13 in the 3rd year.
Spurrier peaked in years 5-7 at 11-2 and a post season AP #4 in year 7, and declined to p--- poor his final season.
Holtz delined to 5-7, 5-7 and 6-5
Spurrier declined to 7-6 and 3-9 (but his record that last year was 2-4 because he quit after 6 games.)
He forgot how to maintain control over his team. Did he forget how to coach or did he never really know how to coach? Either way, he needs to go.2 years ago, Beamer was the right coach with the right staff building the right culture. We were playoff bound in 2025, Sellers was a Heisman favorite and a number one draft pick, Harbor was going to be a superstar WR and Stewart was high first round.
Did Beamer forget how to coach?
I think the stars he had came out of high school ready to play college ball, just don’t think he was able to develop them past that level!!He forgot how to maintain control over his team. Did he forget how to coach or did he never really know how to coach? Either way, he needs to go.
You're mentality residing in a prevoius era. You cannot pull in big recruits with big name coaches anymore.Holtz and Spurrier proved you can win out South Carolina. We have to quit hiring lousy coaches.
Money does not buy happiness, this rings true for us.We are spending more than UGA. We are spending more than Clemson. There is no reason we shouldn't be able to win with the right coaching staff building the right culture. I just hasn't been done with any regularity.
Each started low and built us up though. Taking the overall average doesnt highlight that Holtz took over a 1 win team, went winless his first year, then built us to what, 8 wins his third year?
Holtz and Spurrier proved it could be done here. What they did was run out of energy.Let's be realistic.
Neither Holtz nor Spurrier were able to sustain their OWN success.
Holtz peaked in his 3rd year and declined back to middling his final 3 years. Peaked at an end of season AP #13 in the 3rd year.
Spurrier peaked in years 5-7 at 11-2 and a post season AP #4 in year 7, and declined to p--- poor his final season.
Holtz delined to 5-7, 5-7 and 6-5
Spurrier declined to 7-6 and 3-9 (but his record that last year was 2-4 because he quit after 6 games.)
GamecockCentral Football
A statistical audit of South Carolina's offense through four games: What's gone right, and what's gone wrong for the Gamecock offense?
GamecockCentral Football
Grading the Gamecocks' performance in blowout loss at Alabama
GamecockCentral Baseball
Notes and takeaways from Kevin Schnall previewing fall baseball practice
GamecockCentral Womens Basketball
South Carolina women's basketball: Exhibition mailbag
GamecockCentral Football
South Carolina falls again in FPI standings after lopsided loss to Alabama