Article; Disastrous Games Show Recruiting Hasn't Matched Hype

Monroe Claxton

All-Conference
Jun 4, 2015
3,021
4,685
0
Every post on the subject assumes that recruiting is a lot better and talent has been greatly improved. If you drop this assumption, the results on the field make a lot more sense
 
  • Like
Reactions: sluggercatfan

MdWIldcat55

Heisman
Dec 9, 2007
20,967
82,711
113
I doubt Troy or Nicholls or Central Michigan have five stars knocking on their doors but they all put up a much better fight than Kentucky, were better prepared and reacted better to in-game developments.

Articles like this deflect from the cold reality: Stoops and his assistants are terrible coaches.
 

KY1WING

Senior
Sep 15, 2005
1,363
623
0
It's better. Look at the rankings.

Somethings lost in the transition between Friday Nights and Saturday Afternoons.
 

KendallCat

Heisman
Sep 14, 2002
40,953
11,743
93
Excellent article and makes a lot of great points. Was talking with some folks last night who were asking me about UK and what was going on. In looking at Stoops the last four years and comparing him to other coaches a few things are very apparent:

* Stoops and his staff are unorganized, they don't prepare well, and they don't make adjustments in game. This tells me they basically think on a lower level than most coaches, and they are only capable of going so far whether it is recruiting, schemes, player development... How many games have we come from behind with Stoops and won in the 2nd half versus how many times have we had a lead and lost it? How many times have we started the season 4-1 or 5-1 only to collapse. It means other teams make adjustments and we don't.

* Stoops is a micromanager and does not allow his people a chance to succeed. Not sure whether or not Brown or Dawson would have succeeded here or if they were calling the plays, but they seem to do better without Stoops than with him. Rather than let his people do their jobs he is constantly getting in the way on the sidelines. Rather than constantly mingling he should focus on time management, player development, having a gameplan plus being proactive and thinking ahead.

* If not for his recruiting success on paper I don't think he would have made it this long, but has he really done a great job of recruiting? With our 4 star/highly rated recruits how have they developed - Timmons, Barker, Baker, Towles, Elam, Bone, Horton, Richardson.... I think the article makes a great point about recruiting versus evaluating. Look at Brooks and his guys that were 2-3 stars but were players - Trevard, Wesley, Braxton, Corey Peters, Myron Pryor, Keenan, Dickie Lyons, Tamme.... - that is just naming a few. This staff thinks grabbing players Ohio State does not want and not developing equals success. We have kids who are lazy, don't want to practice or train and only want to show up on Saturdays to play.

Leadership is the biggest thing missing along with organization or lack of it. Tell me who are the leaders on the field? Who is leading in the locker room, in practice, on the staff? In hindsight everyone got excited about Barker and all of the guys he was recurring to come here, but now that fight in Richmond makes a lot of sense. Why would two teammates stand around as seen in the video while their QB gets ko'd? That should tell you a ton about what is happening. I don't care if there are 50 guys around - if someone in your group or team needs help you jump in.

It is apparent that Stoops will be gone either this year or next - only positive is there are a lot of young players left with very few seniors so the next coach should have some ammo.
 

jnewc2_rivals30628

All-Conference
Nov 22, 2006
6,564
3,919
0
This is what happens when you hire a bunch of guys based on their recruiting abilities alone. You get a whole lot of hype with little substance to back it up.
 

JasonS.

All-American
Oct 10, 2001
41,813
7,192
0
Recruiting may be better...rankings can be deceitful but Stoops appears to be just plain dumb to me.

 

KendallCat

Heisman
Sep 14, 2002
40,953
11,743
93
The other issue is you have a HC with no HC experience, a DC with no DC experience, no ST coach due to HC not having managerial or organizational skills = recipe for disaster. Not only that but you cannot just load up on WR's and DB's becsuse of star ratings and ignore your oline and Dline. You cannot show up and act like you are at FSU and have 10-15 first rounders on your team and just roll the ball out.
 

heidiho99

Freshman
Oct 15, 2010
3,183
90
0
I agree somewhat with the OP....most of these guys don't pass the eye test to me.......now having said that the coaching HAS to get better....and I'm not sure that's gonna happen....but after 4 years of recruiting we should have better depth and talent....I don't see it...
 

cavecat

Redshirt
Oct 25, 2015
26
34
0
I don't think it's an evaluation problem. Actually, i think there is someone on staff with a keen eye for talent. How many players have we recruited who were unranked or low 2 stars only to blow up in the rankings and sign with the big boys later? This shows me the problem is in player development.
 

Fresh Start

Heisman
Sep 13, 2015
12,029
30,144
113
The other issue is you have a HC with no HC experience, a DC with no DC experience, no ST coach due to HC not having managerial or organizational skills = recipe for disaster. Not only that but you cannot just load up on WR's and DB's becsuse of star ratings and ignore your oline and Dline. You cannot show up and act like you are at FSU and have 10-15 first rounders on your team and just roll the ball out.

Special teams sucked when we had a special teams coach.
 

Fresh Start

Heisman
Sep 13, 2015
12,029
30,144
113
I agree somewhat with the OP....most of these guys don't pass the eye test to me.......now having said that the coaching HAS to get better....and I'm not sure that's gonna happen....but after 4 years of recruiting we should have better depth and talent....I don't see it...

Their isn't a talent problem at certain positions (rd, wr, db) but there is a huge talent problem concentrated at certain positions (OT, DT, DE, LB) So yes we have more higher ranked guys but they all play the same positions.
 

ukalum1988

Heisman
Dec 21, 2014
12,158
31,403
113
Special teams sucked when we had a special teams coach.
Special Teams actually weren't that bad in Stoops first year when Bradley Dale Peveto was the ST coach. But, they have greatly disappointed since then.
 

vhcat70

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
57,418
38,482
0
Look at our DT & NT recruits in that period. Everything else is fluff for the masses.
 

Saguaro Cat

All-American
Apr 27, 2008
15,828
6,447
113
What a **** article. Clay's the worst. Yeah, why hasn't Stoops great recruiting classes made his first year of 2-10 retroactively better? Stoops has problems, but talent on the field isn't one. We are beating off good teams to get these players here. He's underachieving big time. But the cupboard is stocked for the next guy to step in and win immediately.
 

K_TIME

Heisman
Jan 2, 2003
18,129
25,041
113
This is what happens when you hire a bunch of guys based on their recruiting abilities alone. You get a whole lot of hype with little substance to back it up.
This staff can't develop players period and end of story....that is by far the biggest issue with the program.

It's almost like a similar issue Joker had...he fired most of Brooks coaches because we wanted more recruiters on staff (Petri, Heggins) and the player development went to crap. Watching Woodson/Hartline vs. Towles/Barker is night and day. Ventrell Jenkins, Pryor, Lumpkin, Jarmon, Zipp Duncan, Gary Williams, Justin Jeffries, Eric Scott vs. the entire DL and OL (maybe Toth is an exception) is a complete night and day as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JHannibalSmith