As unethical as it is....
- Thread starter TNCatfanforever
- Start date
The ACC has a provision about sportsmanship, but this will not be an NCAA violation. Neither is cheating on your wife or lying to a fan base or misleading an AD. Pulling a kid's scholly on the eve of signing date is also not an NCAA violation.
Hold that thought and wait for UL's bowl game and the commentary during that game. And, wait and see what the ACC does with this. I doubt they are done with this in one week.
Jurich's "it's their problem" approach won't be shared by the ACC and it keeps hidden the rest of the story. Holding back means that as more is released, the story is continuously revived.
There is a method to Jurich's madness. UL fans will claim it is becaue he is a man who will take the hits for his team. LOL
The reason is that there is probably more salacious details and he does not want to reveal what the media and WF has not yet uncovered. Only admit to what others can prove. Sit on the rest.
The reason is that there is probably more salacious details and he does not want to reveal what the media and WF has not yet uncovered. Only admit to what others can prove. Sit on the rest.
But that makes sense. The army should try to know everything about its opponent. Tactical positions, military training locations, weapons.
Wonder how many other schools are involved. It is not an isolated incident.
Furthermore, is it wrong for an assistant coach who leaves a school to share plays his previous employer uses. Because assistants move around a great amount even within conferences where play is much more important.
You'd think the NCAA would be looking for any excuse to ding UL after the crap they've pulled the past 10 years.
How does UL leave a smoking gun like this? Other schools reportedly took the bait and never were caught. Is it possible there is an ethical coach at UL who purposely left info for WF to find because he rejected the staff's decision to benefit from this wrongdoing?
It seems to me that it is pretty telling that not a single team over the past 2-3 years came forward to out this guy who was either willingly giving out, or selling, confidential information regarding game planning. Since no one during that time came out it seems likely that he either didn't offer it to many teams, and/or every team offered took it and kept their mouths shut.
Isn't it funny and coincidental the UL's nationally rated defense had trouble and they lost the next two games after this came out?
Ironically, I think UL ducks the hit pretty easily of it is established that they were the only other party w/playbook material on their property. Why?....because ACC will likely deem it a "local problem" and then it is only up to Jurich to ignore the issue as has been done with shady Cardinal dealings in the past.
However, if this turns into a conference conspiracy where many ACC teams participated or an inter-conference long-term practice (e.g. Army), I think UL will get sucked into whatever collective punishment is deemed appropriate for all parties (game forfeitures, coach suspensions, etc).
However, if this turns into a conference conspiracy where many ACC teams participated or an inter-conference long-term practice (e.g. Army), I think UL will get sucked into whatever collective punishment is deemed appropriate for all parties (game forfeitures, coach suspensions, etc).
I think carelessness of the details due to a school culture with no accountability is more likely
You have to be a pretty good coach to be able to hand your secret plays to your opponents and still go to a bowl.