How many are the Gamecocks claiming?
As long we are free to identify ourselves as NC's I say we go for 10
![]()
After much research, I posted on the other thread, we should be the 1903 and 1921 champions, and laid out my very sound and quite profound logic.
It would be nice if we can find 2 more, so we could now suddenly have 4 nattys in football vs Clemson's 3.
Bama has won 10 national championships in my life time. Those weren't "add ons."That would 9nly work for about 5 minutes. I've already heard the years they are planning to add too.
I had this conversation with an auburn fan years ago. Apparently, Bama just claims years where they were undefeated or close to, and they say the local Alabama paper ranked them #1, so they claim it.
To Harvard's point, it would be totally cringe for a month or two, imo. But then look at Bama. Enough time goes by, and no one cares. They just have X number of banners.
Bama has won 10 national championships in my life time. Those weren't "add ons."
As a former Alabama fan I don't recognize those. 10 is still a big number. And they won at least one before The Bear. Auburn won one the year I was born and I remember them winning some kind of game against Oregon. I would prefer to win one before WE start adding ones.No, this guy was talking about old years, like 20's or 30's. Some of those years Bama was 5-0, and their local paper said "champion".
Don't think it's possible to embarrass an Aubarn fanTo all Auburn fans, serious question, Aren't you the slightest bit embarrassed ?
I'm not an Auburn fan, but I think I can answer that with a big fat "no."To all Auburn fans, serious question, Aren't you the slightest bit embarrassed ?
That's true. As ridiculous as this is, it does seem to fit perfectly with the current state of college football.College football has jumped the shark.