Toggle sidebar

Barr

Airport

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,344
7,098
113
moe said:
He'll do anything to protect our corrupt POTUS thus he has zero credibility. Worst AG ever.
Click to expand...
The worst was the affirmative action Holder who started F&F that got people killed without ever telling Mexico they were running it as a means to and end to get around the selling of guns and the second amendment.
 
T

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,338
59
48
countryroads89 said:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.



But the IG report says otherwise.

Woops!

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/co...ral-draft-report-says-fbi-didn-t-spy-n1093066
Click to expand...


You're going back to an article about a draft of the report? NBC doesn't allow ad removal tools, and I'm not disabling, so I'm not reading. But seriously, a draft, and you're taking their word for it?

Read the damn report fool.
  • Horowitz documented more spying than I was previously aware of.
  • I certain NONE of the FISA's are approved without the FBI lying. They failed in May/June without the dossier.
  • As Barr said yesterday, the FBI's response doesn't match the evidence acquired/accusation justifying opening the investigation.
  • Horowitz's fix list was quite long. Wray has quite the job ahead of him. Of course he hasn't even started the list from the Hillbag IG report, so we know where that's going to go, too.
 
C

countryroads89_rivals

Sophomore
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
TarHeelEer said:
You're going back to an article about a draft of the report? NBC doesn't allow ad removal tools, and I'm not disabling, so I'm not reading. But seriously, a draft, and you're taking their word for it?

Read the damn report fool.
  • Horowitz documented more spying than I was previously aware of.
  • I certain NONE of the FISA's are approved without the FBI lying. They failed in May/June without the dossier.
  • As Barr said yesterday, the FBI's response doesn't match the evidence acquired/accusation justifying opening the investigation.
  • Horowitz's fix list was quite long. Wray has quite the job ahead of him. Of course he hasn't even started the list from the Hillbag IG report, so we know where that's going to go, too.
Click to expand...

HAHAHAHA.

The final says the same thing as their news article. Their article sourced portions of the report itself, before it was released.

I think I'll start calling you "Dig Dug." LMAO!
 
T

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,338
59
48
countryroads89 said:
HAHAHAHA.

The final says the same thing as their news article. Their article sourced portions of the report itself, before it was released.

I think I'll start calling you "Dig Dug." LMAO!
Click to expand...

Uh-huh, I'm sure it's in context. Did you read the report? I read the first 300 pages.
 
K

Keyser76

Freshman
Apr 7, 2010
11,912
58
0
Lol, he is a piece of work, another of those opus Dei morons or whatever they are called Old pale stale male GOPers thinking they can keep the future off Americas lawn. Why are they all fat asses? Well, except for Donny, he is 6 foot 6 and under 300 lbs, lmfao.
 
C

countryroads89_rivals

Sophomore
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
dave said:
The IG report confirmed what Barr said. You just are not smart at all.
Click to expand...

No, it didn't.

This is from the report.

McCabe told the OIG that he was never involved in any discussions about
placing an FBI CHS into the Trump campaign to further the Crossfire Hurricane
investigation, or for any other purpose. Former Director James Corney told the OIG
that, if there had been an effort to place a CHS within the Trump campaign, he
would have expected to have been notified of that. He also said he had no
knowledge of any FBI CHSs that had been asked by the FBI to join the Trump
campaign in any capacity, and no information that would support an allegation that
the FBI had been spying on the Trump campaign.

Sorry honey. You are wrong like always.
 
dave

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
countryroads89 said:
No, it didn't.

This is from the report.

McCabe told the OIG that he was never involved in any discussions about
placing an FBI CHS into the Trump campaign to further the Crossfire Hurricane
investigation, or for any other purpose. Former Director James Corney told the OIG
that, if there had been an effort to place a CHS within the Trump campaign, he
would have expected to have been notified of that. He also said he had no
knowledge of any FBI CHSs that had been asked by the FBI to join the Trump
campaign in any capacity, and no information that would support an allegation that
the FBI had been spying on the Trump campaign.

Sorry honey. You are wrong like always.
Click to expand...
Poor guy. The FISA warrant is all the evidence I need to mock you.
 
DvlDog4WVU

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,250
3,320
113
countryroads89 said:
No, it didn't.

This is from the report.

McCabe told the OIG that he was never involved in any discussions about
placing an FBI CHS into the Trump campaign to further the Crossfire Hurricane
investigation, or for any other purpose. Former Director James Corney told the OIG
that, if there had been an effort to place a CHS within the Trump campaign, he
would have expected to have been notified of that. He also said he had no
knowledge of any FBI CHSs that had been asked by the FBI to join the Trump
campaign in any capacity, and no information that would support an allegation that
the FBI had been spying on the Trump campaign.

Sorry honey. You are wrong like always.
Click to expand...
And yet it happened.
 
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,696
6,301
113
DvlDog4WVU said:
The FISA is the spying you ignorant jackass.

THE has already given you a spanking on people inserting into the campaign.
Click to expand...

Didn't you tell me the other day everyone knows country is a running joke. Why are you getting upset with the board's Court Jester?

 
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,696
6,301
113
countryroads89 said:
No, it didn't.
Click to expand...

Attorney General Bill Barr: The Trump Campaign “was clearly spied upon. That’s what electronic surveillance is. I think wiring people up to go in and talk to people and make recordings of their conversations is spying. I think going through people’s emails is spying"

countryroads89 said:
Sorry honey. You are wrong like always.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
dave

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
countryroads89 said:
You are literally trying to argue something happened that clearly didn’t and documented by an investigation.
Click to expand...
You are literally trying to argue something using a report that says the exact opposite of what you claim it says. You need to read it.
 
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,696
6,301
113
dave said:
You are literally trying to argue something using a report that says the exact opposite of what you claim it says. You need to read it.
Click to expand...

If Truth in the form of facts were something country accepted, the truth in fact would be country not being so ill informed.
 
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,696
6,301
113
So here's a thought....Schiff's committee spent all of that time trying to prove "bribery" or a "quid pro quo" or even "extortion" correct? Of course as we all know no witness had first hand knowledge or evidence of any of that according to their own testimony correct?

So now Nadler's "Jabba the Hut" committee decides to recommend articles of impeachment that involve only "abuse of power" or "obstruction of Congress", none of which the actual witnesses Schiff called on to testify spoke anything of correct? Who talked about "abuses of power" or "obstruction of Congress" during impeachment inquiry testimony? Nadler didn't even suggest "quid Pro Quo" or "obstruction" or even "bribery" in his recommended articles did he? o_O

So who will be the material witnesses House managers re-call during a Senate trial to substantiate the testimony given during inquiry to Schiff's committee as to the House Judiciary committee's adopted charges?:confused:

No impeachment.
 
C

countryroads89_rivals

Sophomore
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
dave said:
You are literally trying to argue something using a report that says the exact opposite of what you claim it says. You need to read it.
Click to expand...


Hahahahahahaha

I quoted it. You haven’t read it and you obviously never quoted it.

Trumpers’ alternative facts are the opposite of reality. I knew this would be epic. Poor ole tarheel, aka DigDug, just set himself up to be humiliated and the rest of you trumpers are joining right in. Hilarious!
 
dave

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
countryroads89 said:
Hahahahahahaha

I quoted it. You haven’t read it and you obviously never quoted it.

Trumpers’ alternative facts are the opposite of reality. I knew this would be epic. Poor ole tarheel, aka DigDug, just set himself up to be humiliated and the rest of you trumpers are joining right in. Hilarious!
Click to expand...
You quoted a small piece of it that didnt even make your argument. The report definitely says that the FBI spied on the Trump campaign.
 
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,696
6,301
113
dave said:
You quoted a small piece of it that didnt even make your argument. The report definitely says that the FBI spied on the Trump campaign.
Click to expand...

The IG report also says the FBI repeatedly misled the FISA court as to the veracity of the information they were supplying to continue their warrants to spy (even after they knew their primary source was bogus!) This is totally glossed over by both the media and the sycophants who follow them like country.
 
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,696
6,301
113
Why would House Democrats send an impeachment case to the Senate they know they cannot prove and they know will be dismissed with Trump totally vindicated/exonerated? The idea is to keep Trump from being re-elected is it not?o_O

This case does the exact opposite of that and not only assures his re-election probably by a landslide, but virtually guarantees their defeat as part of an enormous angry voter backlash! They can already see how this is pissing folks off, that's why they "changed" their impeachment from "quid pro quo" and "bribery" to "obstruction" and "abuse of power". [eyeroll]

Why are they sending their Baby (impeachment) over Niagara Falls just to see if it can stay afloat?
 
atlkvb

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,696
6,301
113
dave said:
Is someone going to explain to the idiot that the only reason to get a FISA warrant is to spy on them.
Click to expand...

I thought it was common knowledge the FISA court handled all "criminal" cases? [eyeroll]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom