He still paid more % wise than Obama did. You do approve of this, do you not?
Another Biff lie to pacify his minions. Corporations and wealthy are making out like bandits on this.
He still paid more % wise than Obama did. You do approve of this, do you not?
Well, according to rachel madcow, she eval his return, remember that, and compared it to Obama's and his return was a higher %. That's all we have to go on.Wanna bet?
Have you seen Biff's income taxes?He still paid more % wise than Obama did. You do approve of this, do you not?
Well, according to rachel madcow, she eval his return, remember that, and compared it to Obama's and his return was a higher %. That's all we have to go on.
No, all I have is what Madcow showed us about his taxes. She compared his to Obama's, and Obama paid less in %, which is the only way to compare them. Trump makes a lot more.Have you seen Biff's income taxes?
Im guessing he paid whatever percentage the law required.You're probably right, percentage wise. Do you care to guess the percentage trump paid on his 2005 taxes?
Wasn't it in the 20's? I just rmember it was about 10% higher than ObamasYou're probably right, percentage wise. Do you care to guess the percentage trump paid on his 2005 taxes?
Can one of you please come get your 'village idiot' and don't allow him out of your yard again? Thank you.
https://marshall.forums.rivals.com/threads/believe-me.36663/
Can one of you please come get your 'village idiot' and don't allow him out of your yard again? Thank you.
https://marshall.forums.rivals.com/threads/believe-me.36663/
CR89 is like the plague, unwanted wherever she goes.
And racists call conservative black men House N******.Winners debate and cite facts, losers whine and call names.
Shockingly, people who pay taxes are benefitting from a tax cut. Sadly you find that to be a partisan opinion.
You don’t pay for tax cuts. Absurd notion.I really think there are some idiots on this board. One has only mastered the art of cut and paste. I don't think you are one of them. I think you just troll around a good bit. So assuming we make around the same amount, the newest calculations show that I will save as little as $500 per year under this bill or about a single 1 hr lap dance at the local strip club. Up to $4500 on the high end. (Real savings)!! Of course right now, nobody seems to really know.
I am a fiscal conservative and i hate the thought of cutting corporate taxes without eliminating the myriad of loopholes that had already reduced the effective tax rate to where it was just set. of course, the fact that this bill can't pay for itself unless we achieve and sustain 4% growth is just as troubling to me. I am 100% behind true tax reform down right. I just dont think this was done right
You don’t pay for tax cuts. Absurd notion.
Don't ask. It is just made up BS by a moron that took words, spun it and regurgitated it with different words in order to slander Country. It is a despicable personal attack.Huh?
I had one anesthesiologist saying he would save about 10,000. Planning on buying a new car. Do you work for a corporation or for yourself ? If you work for a corporation, anything that benefits the corporation could benefit you. If it hurts the corporation, high taxes, it WILL hurt the employees.I really think there are some idiots on this board. One has only mastered the art of cut and paste. I don't think you are one of them. I think you just troll around a good bit. So assuming we make around the same amount, the newest calculations show that I will save as little as $500 per year under this bill or about a single 1 hr lap dance at the local strip club. Up to $4500 on the high end. (Real savings)!! Of course right now, nobody seems to really know.
I am a fiscal conservative and i hate the thought of cutting corporate taxes without eliminating the myriad of loopholes that had already reduced the effective tax rate to where it was just set. of course, the fact that this bill can't pay for itself unless we achieve and sustain 4% growth is just as troubling to me. I am 100% behind true tax reform down right. I just dont think this was done right
Right now, it's not how much they bring in, it's how much the government has promised to pay out.If the taxes generated from future growth are not greater than the tax cuts, isn't that a cost?
And Obama was around 15%. I didn't see where Obama elected to give the treasury more than he was obligated to pay.For the 2005 taxes, which is all we have, and he didn't voluntarily release them, he paid 36.5 M on 150 M in earnings. About 24%.
Of course it is. That is unless your mind is full of **** which is what you are witnessing with certain others.If the taxes generated from future growth are not greater than the tax cuts, isn't that a cost?
I dont disagree. I think it would be next to impossible to fix the tax structure in the current political environment. I will take my tax cut though. That new transmission set me back my man.I really think there are some idiots on this board. One has only mastered the art of cut and paste. I don't think you are one of them. I think you just troll around a good bit. So assuming we make around the same amount, the newest calculations show that I will save as little as $500 per year under this bill or about a single 1 hr lap dance at the local strip club. Up to $4500 on the high end. (Real savings)!! Of course right now, nobody seems to really know.
I am a fiscal conservative and i hate the thought of cutting corporate taxes without eliminating the myriad of loopholes that had already reduced the effective tax rate to where it was just set. of course, the fact that this bill can't pay for itself unless we achieve and sustain 4% growth is just as troubling to me. I am 100% behind true tax reform down right. I just dont think this was done right
That happens to my budget a lot. I just print more money.If the taxes generated from future growth are not greater than the tax cuts, isn't that a cost?
And Obama was around 15%. I didn't see where Obama elected to give the treasury more than he was obligated to pay.
Cunty called ATL a House N*****. Actually, in a response to ATL, what Cunty did was tell ATL he was Stephen, the character played by Sam Jackson in Django, which typified the most aggregious example ever portrayed in film of what a “House N*****” is and posted Stephen’s picture to solidify who he was talking about. He then proceeded to explain in detail every stereotyped quality a House N***** possesses to justify his post.Huh?
No.If the taxes generated from future growth are not greater than the tax cuts, isn't that a cost?
It’s not a “cost”. Taxes for Govt is equivalent to revenue in corporations. Reduced revenue is not a cost. JFC. For once, put aside your partisanship.Of course it is. That is unless your mind is full of **** which is what you are witnessing with certain others.
Cunty called ATL a House N*****. Actually, in a response to ATL, what Cunty did was tell ATL he was Stephen, the character played by Sam Jackson in Django, which typified the most aggregious example ever portrayed in film of what a “House N*****” is and posted Stephen’s picture to solidify who he was talking about. He then proceeded to explain in detail every stereotyped quality a House N***** possesses to justify his post.
I guess in his and Bru’s idiot logic, because he didn’t actually use the words, just a picture and detailed stereotypical account of what it was, he didn’t actually say it. However, make no mistake, he called ATL, who is a conservative black man, a House N******. He’s a partisan and racist piece of **** and I will forever call attention to it until he mans up and applogizes for it, which to date, he lacks enough character to do.
True, but you would be surprised how many fall for it, ....... truly amazing.You don’t pay for tax cuts. Absurd notion.
So, I guess making comparisons to Hitler doesn’t actually mean you all are call Trump a Nazi? Mmmmmkay racist.You're a liar!
Pretty impressive- three times in one post.