"Believe me"

bamaEER

Freshman
May 29, 2001
32,435
60
0
Another Biff lie to pacify his minions. Corporations and wealthy are making out like bandits on this.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,602
820
113
Shockingly, people who pay taxes are benefitting from a tax cut. Sadly you find that to be a partisan opinion.
 

EEResistable

All-American
May 29, 2001
89,616
6,191
61
I will get to keep a lot more of my money. I don't care if the wealthy get to keep more of theirs as well. They pay most of the taxes and should benefit from the tax cut as much or more than anyone else.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
Well, according to rachel madcow, she eval his return, remember that, and compared it to Obama's and his return was a higher %. That's all we have to go on.

You're probably right, percentage wise. Do you care to guess the percentage trump paid on his 2005 taxes?
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,363
7,114
113
Have you seen Biff's income taxes?
No, all I have is what Madcow showed us about his taxes. She compared his to Obama's, and Obama paid less in %, which is the only way to compare them. Trump makes a lot more.
 
Aug 27, 2001
63,466
198
0
Shockingly, people who pay taxes are benefitting from a tax cut. Sadly you find that to be a partisan opinion.

I really think there are some idiots on this board. One has only mastered the art of cut and paste. I don't think you are one of them. I think you just troll around a good bit. So assuming we make around the same amount, the newest calculations show that I will save as little as $500 per year under this bill or about a single 1 hr lap dance at the local strip club. Up to $4500 on the high end. (Real savings)!! Of course right now, nobody seems to really know.

I am a fiscal conservative and i hate the thought of cutting corporate taxes without eliminating the myriad of loopholes that had already reduced the effective tax rate to where it was just set. of course, the fact that this bill can't pay for itself unless we achieve and sustain 4% growth is just as troubling to me. I am 100% behind true tax reform down right. I just dont think this was done right
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,251
3,325
113
I really think there are some idiots on this board. One has only mastered the art of cut and paste. I don't think you are one of them. I think you just troll around a good bit. So assuming we make around the same amount, the newest calculations show that I will save as little as $500 per year under this bill or about a single 1 hr lap dance at the local strip club. Up to $4500 on the high end. (Real savings)!! Of course right now, nobody seems to really know.

I am a fiscal conservative and i hate the thought of cutting corporate taxes without eliminating the myriad of loopholes that had already reduced the effective tax rate to where it was just set. of course, the fact that this bill can't pay for itself unless we achieve and sustain 4% growth is just as troubling to me. I am 100% behind true tax reform down right. I just dont think this was done right
You don’t pay for tax cuts. Absurd notion.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,363
7,114
113
I really think there are some idiots on this board. One has only mastered the art of cut and paste. I don't think you are one of them. I think you just troll around a good bit. So assuming we make around the same amount, the newest calculations show that I will save as little as $500 per year under this bill or about a single 1 hr lap dance at the local strip club. Up to $4500 on the high end. (Real savings)!! Of course right now, nobody seems to really know.

I am a fiscal conservative and i hate the thought of cutting corporate taxes without eliminating the myriad of loopholes that had already reduced the effective tax rate to where it was just set. of course, the fact that this bill can't pay for itself unless we achieve and sustain 4% growth is just as troubling to me. I am 100% behind true tax reform down right. I just dont think this was done right
I had one anesthesiologist saying he would save about 10,000. Planning on buying a new car. Do you work for a corporation or for yourself ? If you work for a corporation, anything that benefits the corporation could benefit you. If it hurts the corporation, high taxes, it WILL hurt the employees.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,363
7,114
113
For the 2005 taxes, which is all we have, and he didn't voluntarily release them, he paid 36.5 M on 150 M in earnings. About 24%.
And Obama was around 15%. I didn't see where Obama elected to give the treasury more than he was obligated to pay.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,602
820
113
I really think there are some idiots on this board. One has only mastered the art of cut and paste. I don't think you are one of them. I think you just troll around a good bit. So assuming we make around the same amount, the newest calculations show that I will save as little as $500 per year under this bill or about a single 1 hr lap dance at the local strip club. Up to $4500 on the high end. (Real savings)!! Of course right now, nobody seems to really know.

I am a fiscal conservative and i hate the thought of cutting corporate taxes without eliminating the myriad of loopholes that had already reduced the effective tax rate to where it was just set. of course, the fact that this bill can't pay for itself unless we achieve and sustain 4% growth is just as troubling to me. I am 100% behind true tax reform down right. I just dont think this was done right
I dont disagree. I think it would be next to impossible to fix the tax structure in the current political environment. I will take my tax cut though. That new transmission set me back my man.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,251
3,325
113
Cunty called ATL a House N*****. Actually, in a response to ATL, what Cunty did was tell ATL he was Stephen, the character played by Sam Jackson in Django, which typified the most aggregious example ever portrayed in film of what a “House N*****” is and posted Stephen’s picture to solidify who he was talking about. He then proceeded to explain in detail every stereotyped quality a House N***** possesses to justify his post.

I guess in his and Bru’s idiot logic, because he didn’t actually use the words, just a picture and detailed stereotypical account of what it was, he didn’t actually say it. However, make no mistake, he called ATL, who is a conservative black man, a House N******. He’s a partisan and racist piece of **** and I will forever call attention to it until he mans up and applogizes for it, which to date, he lacks enough character to do.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,251
3,325
113
Of course it is. That is unless your mind is full of **** which is what you are witnessing with certain others.
It’s not a “cost”. Taxes for Govt is equivalent to revenue in corporations. Reduced revenue is not a cost. JFC. For once, put aside your partisanship.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
Cunty called ATL a House N*****. Actually, in a response to ATL, what Cunty did was tell ATL he was Stephen, the character played by Sam Jackson in Django, which typified the most aggregious example ever portrayed in film of what a “House N*****” is and posted Stephen’s picture to solidify who he was talking about. He then proceeded to explain in detail every stereotyped quality a House N***** possesses to justify his post.

I guess in his and Bru’s idiot logic, because he didn’t actually use the words, just a picture and detailed stereotypical account of what it was, he didn’t actually say it. However, make no mistake, he called ATL, who is a conservative black man, a House N******. He’s a partisan and racist piece of **** and I will forever call attention to it until he mans up and applogizes for it, which to date, he lacks enough character to do.

You're a liar!

Pretty impressive- three times in one post.
 

WVUBRU

Freshman
Aug 7, 2001
24,731
62
0
The federal government is not a business. The US Treasury doesn't operate like a business. The manner of funds inflow and how the funds are appropriate out are not like a business. A legislative act (which businesses do not do) in which increases the deficit of the budget which will increase the debt is a COST OF FUNDS. A Cash Flow Statement in which can be done with both the Federal Government and a business is the about the only thing that is related between the two different entities. Either know what you are talking about or STFU. Some morons will do neither. They are easily spotted.