Beware

[bornaneer]

Thats the most creative selfie I've ever seen......congratulations. How did you do it?

 

[bornaneer]

bingo

 

[Airport]

Massive spikes in gun purchasing has everything to do with fear. Obama wanted to institute stronger measures for background checks which the whackos spun as "Obama wants to take your guns away". Result was massive gun sales all driven by fear. Fine with me, part of my salary comes from taxes from sporting equipment.

Well, that's one thing we can thank Obama for. Increased guns sales![banana]

 

[mneilmont]

LOL-Broad brush much? You think I'm about taking guns away? That's funny.

I though they were rather direct and at one group. Do you know the meaning of your statement or are you copying a statement that someone else used tha had no meaning there either?

 

[mneilmont]

What the hell took you so long. I've been sitting on pins and needles waiting for a Chicago update.

If you would quit being so damn dumb, you could do your own research. Easy response.

 

[countryroads89_rivals]

If you would quit being so damn dumb, you could do your own research. Easy response.

neil, against my better judgment, I'm going to attempt to explain to your feeble mind how this message board works: when someone makes a claim (like you saying Harry Reid said something) and another poster calls them on it (like me challenging you to provide proof that Harry Reid actually said that), challenging them to provide proof of their claim, it is the responsibility of the poster making the claim (you) to provide evidence to support their claim. Do you comprehend?

 

[bamaEER]

I though they were rather direct and at one group. Do you know the meaning of your statement or are you copying a statement that someone else used tha had no meaning there either?

^^^^Can someone decipher this for me?^^^^

 

[RichardPeterJohnson]

^^^^Can someone decipher this for me?^^^^

[roll]Alzheimers translation needed

 

[mneilmont]

neil, against my better judgment, I'm going to attempt to explain to your feeble mind how this message board works: when someone makes a claim (like you saying Harry Reid said something) and another poster calls them on it (like me challenging you to provide proof that Harry Reid actually said that), challenging them to provide proof of their claim, it is the responsibility of the poster making the claim (you) to provide evidence to support their claim. Do you comprehend?

Cuntre boy, do you really expect anyone to buy into your lying ****, or just plain stupid **** when you suggest you make rules for the board? But if you are allowed to make rules, I want a reimbursement from V., for acting as an imposter. Where in hell do you get off - boy? If you have reason to question anything I say, look it up if you are interested, and refute me. Obviously I did not buy into your original comment. If that were a big problem for me, I would have looked it up.

Are you the typical govt worker?

 

[mneilmont]

LOL-Broad brush much? You think I'm about taking guns away? That's funny.

Can anyone interpret what he is suggesting? The thing that is funny, you state that you know who and why people buy guns. I directly questioned you and the agency for which you suggest you work about " you know who and why". I question that and you respond with a request to be more specific and " painting with broad brush'.

 

[bamaEER]

If you liberals have all that information, just exactly why is more info needed. Not NRA associated, but may I question what info is available to your agency? Will it still be there with a new president appointing new agency heads? Really hope that that kind of info is not made available to the people with an agenda like you.

^^^^You wanted a response to this mess?^^^^
Most of your post seems like partisan conjecture. In a nutshell, I work for a state agency that happens to issue all gun licenses and I do periodically get briefed on gun sale data like who is buying, what kind of guns, are they repeat buyers, etc. The president has no direct control over my agency.

 

[bamaEER]

I though they were rather direct and at one group. Do you know the meaning of your statement or are you copying a statement that someone else used tha had no meaning there either?

And I have no clue what you are saying here. None.

 

[mneilmont]

^^^^You wanted a response to this mess?^^^^
Most of your post seems like partisan conjecture. In a nutshell, I work for a state agency that happens to issue all gun licenses and I do periodically get briefed on gun sale data like who is buying, what kind of guns, are they repeat buyers, etc. The president has no direct control over my agency.

That certainly helps some when you restrict your knowledge to one state agency. You said "all" and I assume that entails more than one area of the state of NY. Or do you really think that your one area is representative of the entire country? Naw.