Toggle sidebar

Board Rules

stpaulcat

stpaulcat

Senior
May 29, 2001
35,285
863
113
xyzbobxyz said:
Two problems - many people don't like to involved or speak up, secondly, that also threatens the value of the minority.

As a country, we are proud of protecting all people equally. Sex, race, religion. Here, I could foresee a bunch of people ganging up on me, or Puke, or Willy - and declaring us ******** worthy of banishment. In fact, there was a thread on the Rock in that very vein targeting me.

I think that a clear rule that can be easily understood and cuts both ways would be fair. If Lou wants to become the Purple Homer page and a code is established, fine. Anyone that lands here will know exactly what it is. Might impact the visit numbers, but whatever. I think the intent is a place where folks can talk about NU football and basketball - that's it. And so more people visit and read than post. And some built the ignore function to make it easier to immediate individuals that one cannot tolerate - closed minded, but great.

And we have the occasional battle royales - which I find interesting and entertaining too. But they tend to fall outside the original intent (see above). If the interest to avoid those instances were important, then a fairly written and evenly applied code of conduct might be a way to accomplish it. To the disappointment of some, Lou and FA haven't elected to play favorites, run off members at the demand of other, more well liked members and most folks are ok with it.

Notice the lack of response by FA or Lou about the prior rules or interest in establishing new rules. Maybe they are content with the status quo. Maybe they want the retain the trump card of booting someone if they simply so feel like it. Who knows. After Saturday night and yet another battle, and another member of two calling for banishment or suspension or just complaining about various posts, I got to thinking about how to fairly raise our game. I don't expect any Code of Conduct to ever come to fruition and will sit back and wait for the next round of entertainment I guess.
Click to expand...
We don't want you banished or suspended, we just want to know why you continue carrying on about what we all understand to be your position. We got it. No further questions. None of us has the power to intervene with Fitz on your behalf.
 
E

EvanstonCat

Senior
May 29, 2001
50,767
767
73
stpaulcat said:
When nearly everyone recognizes that someone is being an *******, that would be called agreement.

I would agree with ECat, that it is not what you say, but how you say it (and how many times).
Click to expand...

No, no. You can say certain things many many times. That's not against the rules.
 
E

EvanstonCat

Senior
May 29, 2001
50,767
767
73
xyzbobxyz said:
Two problems - many people don't like to involved or speak up, secondly, that also threatens the value of the minority.

As a country, we are proud of protecting all people equally. Sex, race, religion. Here, I could foresee a bunch of people ganging up on me, or Puke, or Willy - and declaring us ******** worthy of banishment. In fact, there was a thread on the Rock in that very vein targeting me.

I think that a clear rule that can be easily understood and cuts both ways would be fair. If Lou wants to become the Purple Homer page and a code is established, fine. Anyone that lands here will know exactly what it is. Might impact the visit numbers, but whatever. I think the intent is a place where folks can talk about NU football and basketball - that's it. And so more people visit and read than post. And some built the ignore function to make it easier to immediate individuals that one cannot tolerate - closed minded, but great.

And we have the occasional battle royales - which I find interesting and entertaining too. But they tend to fall outside the original intent (see above). If the interest to avoid those instances were important, then a fairly written and evenly applied code of conduct might be a way to accomplish it. To the disappointment of some, Lou and FA haven't elected to play favorites, run off members at the demand of other, more well liked members and most folks are ok with it.

Notice the lack of response by FA or Lou about the prior rules or interest in establishing new rules. Maybe they are content with the status quo. Maybe they want the retain the trump card of booting someone if they simply so feel like it. Who knows. After Saturday night and yet another battle, and another member of two calling for banishment or suspension or just complaining about various posts, I got to thinking about how to fairly raise our game. I don't expect any Code of Conduct to ever come to fruition and will sit back and wait for the next round of entertainment I guess.
Click to expand...

I prefer Fight Club rules.

Which means all this talk about board rules is nonsense. We shouldn't even be talking about it.
 
N

NUMBfan

Redshirt
Aug 26, 2005
1,085
24
0
I nominate this as the single stupidest thread I have ever seen in more than two decades of membership on Wildcat Report. Can't we just go back to more productive arguments about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin? Good grief.
 
P

pawildcat_rivals209725

Senior
Sep 15, 2006
12,698
996
0
NUMBfan said:
I nominate this as the single stupidest thread I have ever seen in more than two decades of membership on Wildcat Report. Can't we just go back to more productive arguments about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin? Good grief.
Click to expand...

Have to agree. Sometimes I think the motto of the country should be changed to, "It's all about me, and I'm fine with that."
 
P

phatcat_rivals223240

All-Conference
Nov 5, 2001
18,908
1,060
113
NUMBfan said:
I nominate this as the single stupidest thread I have ever seen in more than two decades of membership on Wildcat Report. Can't we just go back to more productive arguments about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin? Good grief.
Click to expand...
I feel dumber for having read it
 
DaCat

DaCat

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
25,587
1,998
113
Worst thread ever!

 
N

NJCat

All-Conference
Mar 7, 2016
21,374
1,538
113
NUMBfan said:
I nominate this as the single stupidest thread I have ever seen in more than two decades of membership on Wildcat Report.
Click to expand...
The one apologizing for NU beating Wisconsin would give this one a run for its money though......
 
X

xxxbobxxx

Sophomore
Mar 12, 2005
10,810
166
43
One positive, we will no longer suffer the cry “Lou, so and so clearly has violated the board rules, ban him”

Clearly, there no rules and no interest to create. Back to survival of the fittest (or fastest thumbs).
 
M

mikewebb68

Senior
Oct 24, 2009
9,811
501
113
After all this, I was able to locate the rules (which is likely why the mods did not chime in on this thread, since there were rules already). Looks like they were simplified a bit when Yahoo took over Rivals, but they seem to be otherwise similar to my recollection of them:

Rules for Rivals message board posts


In an attempt to keep things fun for everyone, Rivals has certain rules when it comes to message board posts. It's at the sole discretion of the site's publisher to ban users that break these rules.



Please refrain from posting any of the following:

  • Profanity
  • Racial Slurs
  • Personal info
  • Advertisements
  • Premium Content
  • Copyrighted material
  • Attacks on players or coaches
  • Rumors about players, coaches, etc.
  • Pornographic or obscene material of any kind
Here's the link:

https://help.yahoo.com/kb/SLN6302.html
 
L

lou v

All-Conference
Staff member
Aug 27, 2004
17,687
2,282
98
Check the top of the board. You want rules, I'll give you rules! ;)
 
X

xxxbobxxx

Sophomore
Mar 12, 2005
10,810
166
43
lou v said:
Check the top of the board. You want rules, I'll give you rules! ;)
Click to expand...

Thank you. I think those are pretty fair and clear with some room for maneuvering. I hope all, or at least the main, posters read through them. Lots of violations around here daily.

I would add another suggestion, with a few of my friends in mind, before reporting, or outwardly calling for a ban, ask yourself when you last broke one of those rules. If you can remember, you probably should not be making a stink about somebody else.

Thanks again Lou.
 
Bwm57

Bwm57

All-Conference
Sep 12, 2011
3,736
1,098
103
I feel as if the recent push for board rules is motivated by certain posters desiring to have the ability to act like jerks while not allowing anyone else the chance to tell them they are acting like jerks.
 
X

xxxbobxxx

Sophomore
Mar 12, 2005
10,810
166
43
Bwm57 said:
I feel as if the recent push for board rules is motivated by certain posters desiring to have the ability to act like jerks while not allowing anyone else the chance to tell them they are acting like jerks.
Click to expand...

Guess that depends on the definition of jerk. I suppose the PKK would agree with you in that the definition would be anyone that posts anything critical of NU or the program.

Sorry, but not sorry for their loss. Long overdue. It is supposed to be a place where fans can debate football and basketball topics. Debate requires two sides at a minimum.
 
Bwm57

Bwm57

All-Conference
Sep 12, 2011
3,736
1,098
103
xyzbobxyz said:
”would agree with you in that the definition would be anyone that posts anything critical of NU or the program.”
Click to expand...
I don’t believe I posted my opinion.
You aren’t trying to attack me by attributing statements to me that I didn’t make, are you??
 
X

xxxbobxxx

Sophomore
Mar 12, 2005
10,810
166
43
Bwm57 said:
I don’t believe I posted my opinion.
You aren’t trying to attack me by attributing statements to me that I didn’t make, are you??
Click to expand...

My, an early loose interpretation... No, not attacking. I was extrapolating from your post. Never scored high on those reading comprehension questions. :p
 
stpaulcat

stpaulcat

Senior
May 29, 2001
35,285
863
113
xyzbobxyz said:
Guess that depends on the definition of jerk. I suppose the PKK would agree with you in that the definition would be anyone that posts anything critical of NU or the program.

Sorry, but not sorry for their loss. Long overdue. It is supposed to be a place where fans can debate football and basketball topics. Debate requires two sides at a minimum.
Click to expand...
I just wanna be ME
I just wanna be ME
'Til the day that I'm free
You do you, I'll do ME
I look back now and I can't explain it
Always knew that I was waiting for greatness
Mum wanted me to work in the slave shift
But I was writing my lyrics in the grave shift
Perfecting the style so amazing I rose through the ranks so quick I was blazing
Sorry to upset you mother but right now I've gotta do me, time's wasting
I had a scheme and a dream. Time that I prove I could stand on my feet
Jab or weave here in the city full of feats and fiends
Life don't stop, time don't sleep
I feel like I'm lost
My ears are on fire, they speak
And they all think they know what's best but
I just wanna be ME
I just wanna be ME
'Til the day that I'm free
You do you and I'll do ME
 
V

villox

Senior
Aug 19, 2008
22,084
670
0
I propose a 1 week modification to the following rule to specifically allow E-Cat to post his OSU hate with reckless abandon.

5. No repetitive negative posting. What makes a repetitive post? If you come to the forum and consistently say the exact same thing about the exact same topic day in and day out, that is being repetitive. Be sure to understand that no one is saying that you can not be critical. But this site will not be overrun by the same people coming on the site day after day saying the same negative things.
 
E

EvanstonCat

Senior
May 29, 2001
50,767
767
73
villox said:
I propose a 1 week modification to the following rule to specifically allow E-Cat to post his OSU hate with reckless abandon.

5. No repetitive negative posting. What makes a repetitive post? If you come to the forum and consistently say the exact same thing about the exact same topic day in and day out, that is being repetitive. Be sure to understand that no one is saying that you can not be critical. But this site will not be overrun by the same people coming on the site day after day saying the same negative things.
Click to expand...

What is negative about hating dOSU?

If hating dOSU is wrong, then I don't want to be right.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom