Boom
- Thread starter countryroads89_rivals
- Start date
No, that he will be impeached. You seemed so confident that he won't.
Put your money where your big, fat, ignorant mouth is.
I say he will be impeached.....and have said that from the start.......You say he won't? You seem to be getting a little testy and your memory appears to be failing .....relax and get some rest.
He is convinced this is a winning strategy for the Dems. It’s very simple, based on the facts that we have, President Trump has done nothing to warrant impeachment other than beat Hillary in 2016 and projected to likely win re-election in 2020.
I have said from the start that this was a farce but they would impeach Trump even though nothing he did was grounds for this dog and pony show. Anyone with half a brain can see what is going on.
This is probably the most worthless bet I've ever taken up. Here's why:
1) You cannot prove your case
2) You do not have a case
3) You will not admit you're already defeated (based on facts you cannot provide)
4) You won't leave after you lose.(because you're a liar)
So, if you're correct and Dems are about to impeach Trump, do they have the numbers right now (Yes or no?)
Why hasn't Nancy called a whip count yet?
If articles are voted out of committee this week, will a floor vote be scheduled before the end of the current session? (Yes or No?)
How will that happen when there hasn't even been a rules committee vote scheduled yet to consider how the evidence will be heard on the full House floor? (Why can't you explain that?)
If a vote is scheduled on the floor, will all the Democrats vote for impeachment?(Yes or No?)
If not, how will that case ever stand a chance in the Republican dominated Senate for conviction? If Trump's not going to be convicted, why are Dems impeaching him? (Explain)
You have consistently refused to answer each and every one of these questions I have repeatedly asked, just as you continue to refuse explaining what precisely are the crimes Trump has committed? (Explain them)
Abuse of power? (What Constitutional power did he use he doesn't have authority as Commander-in-Chief to use?)
Extortion? (What did he gain as a result of whomever or whatever he extorted?)
Bribery? (How much money did he offer or hold up or what did he get in exchange for his bribe?)
You cannot answer me, you will not answer me, yet you come on here daily and boast and brag and post hahahahahahahahahah's on all the threads yet you're the biggest ignorant uninformed mind numbed poster on this board and it's not even close!
When Democrats don't hold their impeachment vote before Christmas will you at least admit today you've lost and go away?
Of course not, you won't even do that! Because just as I said, this is a worthless bet. You're welching on it even as I speak and it's as obvious as your silence is answering my questions about how you're going to win it if you haven't already lost it?
How can someone so confident of victory be such a wimp answering questions that should easily prove victory is imminent?
Because you're already a loser, and you know it!
Last edited:
So when's the impeachment vote and is it unanimous on the Democrat side?
Show us how confident you are of this victory by your silence.
What is the point of impeaching him if he isn't going to be convicted?
Explain the rationale behind that? Can you?
100% guarantee you cannot.
It is a farce, it is a "dog and pony show" and anyone can see it. I do not however think Democrats will impeach Trump. They will draft articles, and threaten, but at the end of the day all they will do is use the accusations to run against him in '20 because they don't have anything or anyone else to try and beat him with. I predict they will NOT commit political suicide by impeaching him and sending their losing unsubstantiated case to the Senate to be shredded like Championship day celebration confetti.
What is the reason to impeach him if you can't get a conviction? It's mind numbingly stupid.
What was it? Name the crime this Harvard Law professor provided the evidence of Trump's guilt on?
Explain Trump's "abuse of power" and what part of his Constitutional authority he violated?
Explain what part of the President's Constitutional powers today's witnesses proved with facts he violated?
Presidential powers under the Constitution
Synopsis:
Despite the lack of attention given to the executive, historian Jack Rakove called the creation of the presidency the framers' "most creative act." In Article II of the new Constitution, the framers offered the world something entirely new: a chief executive whose power came from the people rather than heredity or force. The Constitution, however, provides little hint that the president would become as powerful as he has in modern times. The framers obviously assumed that the legislative branch would be much more influential. Madison wrote that it would "rarely if ever happen that the excecutive constituted as ours is proposed to be would have firmness enough to resist the legislature." Among the delegates, only Alexander Hamilton strongly advocated an executive with the power to match the monarchs of Europe
Section. 1.
The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years....
Section. 2.
The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.
The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.
Section. 3.
He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.
If the vote were held today to impeach Trump, would he be impeached?
If your answer is "yes", then why don't they just take the vote now and get this over with?
If your answer is "no", why are you on this board insisting he is about to be impeached?
If he's impeached, why won't you bet he gets convicted?
You're obviously not very convicted of your convictions are 'ya?
Early in this process two people provided a transcript of the phone call Trump had with the President of Ukraine. Trump and Schiff.
One was an accurate, factual transcript of exactly what was said during the conversation.
The other was a complete fabrication, made up, and never happened.
Who provided the honest transcript, and who was lying with their made up transcript?
I'll bet you 100% can't even honestly answer that obvious fact based question.
Why not?
Does everyone reading this thread now see what a total loser and a farce @countryroads89 is?
Just go back and read all of the questions country refuses to answer while boasting Trump's about to be impeached. [eyeroll]
Just go back and read all of the questions country refuses to answer while boasting Trump's about to be impeached. [eyeroll]
I’m not sure why you bang out 11 posts in a row saying the same thing to the same person. Everyone who posts on this board knows he’s a cvnt. 1 post will do, no need to spam it.
Very good advice. I never get a response anyway so the point you're making is well accepted as well as appreciated for bringing that to my attention. I don't know why I didn't realize it sooner.
You need to cry just a little more because this is getting old little girl.
Gets called a cvunt, thinks someone else it getting smacked around. Poor little cvunt.
He knows what's coming, @atlkvb....He's posting pipedreams and bull$h!t, along with the rest of his board lefty cohorts.
Their leftist leaders have them eating out of the palm of their hands. The giddier they get, the harder they're going to cry. This is going to hurt them worse than losing the 2016 election.
Wait until the results of the 2020 election. :cool2:
30CAT, can any of them explain why it makes sense to impeach Trump only to see him exonerated in the Senate and made a martyr? Why impeach him if they know it's going nowhere on the other side?
See, I think this is the exact reason they DO NOT impeach him!
Whether I lose our bet or win it, either way it... will be my distinct pleasure to not have to read your inane posts anymore. There honestly cannot be anyone on this forum who is proven more wrong more often more consistently than you are. I honestly don't even know why you bother except you could be a glutton for ridicule.
You are absolutely correct. Like The Three Stooges, they're trying to save a sinking ship by drilling holes in the floor of the boat so the water will drain out.
Nancy Pelosi's refusal to call a whip count ought to be sending giant warning signs throughout their caucus 30CAT! Schiff claims he has all the evidence he needs and the votes to impeach Trump yet he has to "consult" with his constituents to determine if they should go through with it?
Nancy isn't sure about it either? What are they so "confused" about?They have to call in a bunch of Leftist "egg head" third party observers of Constitutional Law to give a bunch of hypothetical scenarios to make their case that Trump deserves to be impeached and removed from Office? They don't trust the voters to know that?
They're just in a huge sink hole 30CAT, and this is going to be the absolute worst disaster for them they will regret for decades to come.
The facts are on the President' side...listen
Last edited:
Déjà vu
I say at the end of the day, our President will not be impeached or will be exonerated in the Senate. Want to bet? Leftists have totally wasted their time.