Posted a rambling dissertation of this on The Lair, but in a nutshell it really comes down to this....if SEC gets chosen for an Orange Bowl bid then Birmingham is almost certainly our destination. If not then Hello Shreveport.
Theres really no other options, as Belk will almost certainly take USC for geographical reasons and Liberty will chose between Ole MIss and Arkansas
tuck66, you are likely kidding, but you know, with the SEC contracts, there is no declining of bowls, now.
If I remember correctly, Missouri declined a bowl invitation last year. Not sure they were slotted for a SEC contract bowl however.
Weren't they a 5 win team that got invited because there wasn't enough bowl eligible teams?
But on the other hand, there was some interesting matchups for UK, I am sure the BC would be interesting, just like ours would be if it was against Miami.
Thought they declined because some students had made some 'politically incorrect' statements.:joy:If I remember correctly, Missouri declined a bowl invitation last year. Not sure they were slotted for a SEC contract bowl however.
Thought they declined because some students had made some 'politically incorrect' statements.:joy:
The value of a bowl this year is 15 extra December practices for a maturing team with 19 starters returning and a chance to win 7-8 games in 2017. It matters. I can't help laughing at some of our fans. Prior to the season, they were demanding a bowl. By October, they were demanding for Coach Stoops to be fired. Now we are going to a bowl, and people are suddenly getting picky. LOL!DECLINE!
DECLINE!
tuck66, you are likely kidding, but you know, with the SEC contracts, there is no declining of bowls, now.
Isn't that a violation of board policy to post under multiple accounts?He's not serious. This is the same guy as SSPumper.
We sent BC Wake's game plan lolForget BC. They can't score and they've got to win out against a bad Uconn (yup) and medicore Wake (nope) to get to 6. Wake should beat them by 3 scores... and by that I mean FG's. 9-0 Wake.
Isn't that a violation of board policy to post under multiple accounts?