Breaking: Legislative Commission Forwards 11 Proposals to IHSA Member Schools, 12 Total on Ballot

Edgytim

Senior
Staff member
May 29, 2001
427
628
113
The Roxana Liberated Army proposal has failed.

Legislative Commission Forwards 11 Proposals to IHSA Member Schools, 12 Total on Ballot

The Illinois High School Association’s Legislative Commission voted Monday (Nov. 24) to advance 11 proposals amending the IHSA Constitution and By-laws to a vote of the general membership. The Commission voted after hearing feedback from member school personnel at 28 town meetings held in-person around the state during the month of November. Twelve total proposals will appear on the ballot, as the submitter of proposal 1 took advantage of a clause in the IHSA by-laws that allows a returning proposal to appear on the ballot if the IHSA receives petitions from 20% percent of member schools requesting to have it included on the following referendum ballot.

The ballot containing the proposals will be available to each member school’s official representative in the IHSA’s online Schools Center, beginning Monday, December 1. The deadline to submit the ballot is midnight, Monday, December 15. The ballots are expected to be tabulated, and the results posted on Tuesday, December 16. Schools may vote in favor, against, or no opinion on each proposal. A simple majority of yes or no votes cast will determine whether each proposal passes. Proposals that receive the simple majority vote from the IHSA membership will go into effect on July 1, unless another date is noted within the proposal. All language from the original 23 proposals can be found here.

Here is a summary of the proposals on the all-school ballot:


  • Proposal 1: Expands the IHSA Board of Directors to include four additional seats reserved for a Superintendent, President, CEO or Head of School.
  • Proposal 2: Allows IHSA to revise, amend, or supplement any ruling based upon information gathered during legal discovery. Also requires that all obtainable information be presented at the time of the appeal to the Hearing Board, while clarifying that the Executive Director cannot provide a new ruling following an appeal to the Hearing Board.
  • Proposal 5: Prevents a cooperative agreement between two or more schools that exceeds 3,500 students from competing for team awards in the IHSA State Series.
  • Proposal 10: Adds language to the IHSA recruitment by-laws that affirm that the rules apply to prospective student-athletes.
  • Proposal 11: Provides students with the ability to compete in two non-school competitions in that sport during the high school season. A third non-school competition is also allowed if the competition is sanctioned by the National Governing Body of that sport. If this proposal passes, it will go into effect 30 days after being passed.
  • Proposal 12: Allows each school to participate in one football combine that is free of charge to attendees. Schools may organize and transport up to 20 students to attend the combine. If this proposal passes, it will go into effect for the 2026-27 school year. If this proposal passes, it will go into effect 30 days after being passed.
  • Proposal 13: Establishes an IHSA “No Contact Week” that will annually fall during the week of the 4th of July week (June 29 - July 5, 2026). Schools may not practice, compete, hold open gyms, provide conditioning or weight training during this week. If this proposal passes, it will go into effect in July of 2026.
  • Proposal 19: Moves the start of IHSA Football games up one week (eliminating Week 0 scrimmage) and adds 16 teams per classification to the playoffs.
  • Proposal 21: Moves the boys volleyball season start and end date up one week. If this proposal passes, it will go into effect for the 2027 season.
  • Proposal 22: Moves the start of the softball season up one week. If this proposal passes, it will go into effect for the 2026 season.
  • Proposal 23: Moves the start and end of the girls wrestling season up two weeks.
  • Proposal 24: Modifies the suspension for ejection of unsportsmanlike conduct by players in tackle football for flagrant contact to have a video review process to clarify the accuracy of the judgment call. IHSA Staff would review video sent by a school and make a recommendation to the Executive Director to affirm the call on the field or overturn and return a student to their next contest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4Afan

IHSAfan207

Freshman
Sep 9, 2024
92
65
18
I am curious on proposal 12, this could be troublesome. I see $$ playing a role and could lead to recruiting loopholes "come to our school we have a free combine with xyz coming". Could be reading it wrong, who dictates what combines are allowed and what and how many schools can attend? Will Nike D1 be at this school and not that school. If IHSA is going to get into the Combine business hope they are prepared for that.

I do see some potential as most combines are just a money grab and this may be a way for some players without the means to attend a camp.
 

Wittymoniker1

All-Conference
Aug 6, 2007
5,335
1,786
113
The Roxana Liberated Army proposal has failed.

Legislative Commission Forwards 11 Proposals to IHSA Member Schools, 12 Total on Ballot

The Illinois High School Association’s Legislative Commission voted Monday (Nov. 24) to advance 11 proposals amending the IHSA Constitution and By-laws to a vote of the general membership. The Commission voted after hearing feedback from member school personnel at 28 town meetings held in-person around the state during the month of November. Twelve total proposals will appear on the ballot, as the submitter of proposal 1 took advantage of a clause in the IHSA by-laws that allows a returning proposal to appear on the ballot if the IHSA receives petitions from 20% percent of member schools requesting to have it included on the following referendum ballot.

The ballot containing the proposals will be available to each member school’s official representative in the IHSA’s online Schools Center, beginning Monday, December 1. The deadline to submit the ballot is midnight, Monday, December 15. The ballots are expected to be tabulated, and the results posted on Tuesday, December 16. Schools may vote in favor, against, or no opinion on each proposal. A simple majority of yes or no votes cast will determine whether each proposal passes. Proposals that receive the simple majority vote from the IHSA membership will go into effect on July 1, unless another date is noted within the proposal. All language from the original 23 proposals can be found here.

Here is a summary of the proposals on the all-school ballot:


  • Proposal 1: Expands the IHSA Board of Directors to include four additional seats reserved for a Superintendent, President, CEO or Head of School.
  • Proposal 2: Allows IHSA to revise, amend, or supplement any ruling based upon information gathered during legal discovery. Also requires that all obtainable information be presented at the time of the appeal to the Hearing Board, while clarifying that the Executive Director cannot provide a new ruling following an appeal to the Hearing Board.
  • Proposal 5: Prevents a cooperative agreement between two or more schools that exceeds 3,500 students from competing for team awards in the IHSA State Series.
  • Proposal 10: Adds language to the IHSA recruitment by-laws that affirm that the rules apply to prospective student-athletes.
  • Proposal 11: Provides students with the ability to compete in two non-school competitions in that sport during the high school season. A third non-school competition is also allowed if the competition is sanctioned by the National Governing Body of that sport. If this proposal passes, it will go into effect 30 days after being passed.
  • Proposal 12: Allows each school to participate in one football combine that is free of charge to attendees. Schools may organize and transport up to 20 students to attend the combine. If this proposal passes, it will go into effect for the 2026-27 school year. If this proposal passes, it will go into effect 30 days after being passed.
  • Proposal 13: Establishes an IHSA “No Contact Week” that will annually fall during the week of the 4th of July week (June 29 - July 5, 2026). Schools may not practice, compete, hold open gyms, provide conditioning or weight training during this week. If this proposal passes, it will go into effect in July of 2026.
  • Proposal 19: Moves the start of IHSA Football games up one week (eliminating Week 0 scrimmage) and adds 16 teams per classification to the playoffs.
  • Proposal 21: Moves the boys volleyball season start and end date up one week. If this proposal passes, it will go into effect for the 2027 season.
  • Proposal 22: Moves the start of the softball season up one week. If this proposal passes, it will go into effect for the 2026 season.
  • Proposal 23: Moves the start and end of the girls wrestling season up two weeks.
  • Proposal 24: Modifies the suspension for ejection of unsportsmanlike conduct by players in tackle football for flagrant contact to have a video review process to clarify the accuracy of the judgment call. IHSA Staff would review video sent by a school and make a recommendation to the Executive Director to affirm the call on the field or overturn and return a student to their next contest.
Was wondering if Edgy has an inkling if Prop. 19 passes or not?
 

4Afan

All-Conference
Sep 15, 2001
3,502
3,161
113
Curious to know what the language is in prop 10 regarding recruitment.
 

CSLfan

Redshirt
Jul 11, 2020
40
47
18
Vote no on prop 19!!!
Why are people so heavily against prop 19? Just out of curiosity. I look at a school like Zion Benton this year (4-5 with a heart breaking loss to Lake Forest when they were screwed on a missed call from refs) and think that those kids would benefit greatly from another week of football. And it could be 2 weeks if they beat a 5-4 team that they were better than, but played a tougher schedule.

I know we are all high school football fans, that is why we are on this board. But I also think at the end of the day, this is very good for a lot of kids. Evanston is another school that would benefit greatly from another week. Giving their underclassman a taste of playoff football and a desire to work harder in the off season.

I do wish this came with a caveat of (must have 3 wins to qualify) or something of that language.
 

4Afan

All-Conference
Sep 15, 2001
3,502
3,161
113
Why are people so heavily against prop 19? Just out of curiosity. I look at a school like Zion Benton this year (4-5 with a heart breaking loss to Lake Forest when they were screwed on a missed call from refs) and think that those kids would benefit greatly from another week of football. And it could be 2 weeks if they beat a 5-4 team that they were better than, but played a tougher schedule.

I know we are all high school football fans, that is why we are on this board. But I also think at the end of the day, this is very good for a lot of kids. Evanston is another school that would benefit greatly from another week. Giving their underclassman a taste of playoff football and a desire to work harder in the off season.

I do wish this came with a caveat of (must have 3 wins to qualify) or something of that language.
From my perspective it doesn't necessarily benefit teams that will get destroyed against another team. No clue if this passes or how the will set it up, but to me, initially it sounds like the top 16 teams will receive a bye and the remainder will be seeded as they are currently. In 8A the 17 seed was Belleville East and they would have a first round game against whoever the 48 seed would be. No clue who that team would be, but I can't see that being a competitive game against a potential 3 win team.

Also high school football isn't the be all, end all for every kid on the team the way you think it is. After a down year the best day for some of these kids is the day they turn in their equipment so they can focus on basketball, or get a job, or just have no after school obligations. We wax poetic about high school football but a lot of kids don't think that way.
 

wesbreton

Redshirt
Apr 4, 2023
21
24
3
Expand the playoffs and you alleviate the race for 5 wins and the scheduling pressure it creates. Will there be some blowouts? Sure... there are plenty of blowouts already. If it gives the kids the chance to polay more football we should be in favor of it. Remember that top 16 teams will get byes so most of the games will be 7-2/6-3 vs 3-6/4-5 and 5-4 vs 4-5. They might be better than the first round games we have now
 

4Afan

All-Conference
Sep 15, 2001
3,502
3,161
113
Expand the playoffs and you alleviate the race for 5 wins and the scheduling pressure it creates. Will there be some blowouts? Sure... there are plenty of blowouts already. If it gives the kids the chance to polay more football we should be in favor of it. Remember that top 16 teams will get byes so most of the games will be 7-2/6-3 vs 3-6/4-5 and 5-4 vs 4-5. They might be better than the first round games we have now
Again, why are we assuming that all these kids on 3-6 teams want to play more football?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerforFlyers

mc140

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
8,743
2,794
113
Expand the playoffs and you alleviate the race for 5 wins and the scheduling pressure it creates. Will there be some blowouts? Sure... there are plenty of blowouts already. If it gives the kids the chance to polay more football we should be in favor of it. Remember that top 16 teams will get byes so most of the games will be 7-2/6-3 vs 3-6/4-5 and 5-4 vs 4-5. They might be better than the first round games we have now
Doesn't change anything. Teams will schedule to get the bye. Scheduling other sports are a nightmare and everyone makes it.
 

jha618

All-Conference
Jan 1, 2018
3,337
3,927
113
Expand the playoffs and you alleviate the race for 5 wins and the scheduling pressure it creates. Will there be some blowouts? Sure... there are plenty of blowouts already. If it gives the kids the chance to polay more football we should be in favor of it. Remember that top 16 teams will get byes so most of the games will be 7-2/6-3 vs 3-6/4-5 and 5-4 vs 4-5. They might be better than the first round games we have now
The race for 5 will just turn in to the race to 3 for the bottom teams.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mc140