Bullet Train System....

LineSkiCat14

Well-known member
Aug 5, 2015
37,196
4,007
113
Good point.. Europe is substantially smaller than the U.S.



90% of Europe can fit into the Northeast or Southeast. Going from one country to the next would be like driving state to state here.. maybe even less.
 

LineSkiCat14

Well-known member
Aug 5, 2015
37,196
4,007
113
You could get the broad-strokes of Europe going 70mph in a car, in less than 24 hours. Similar to driving a circle around the Northeast, but that leaves out 75% of the US.
 

vhcat70

New member
Feb 5, 2003
57,418
1,222
0
Population density is one good reason.

In Asia and parts of Europe there is huge population density. Lots of people trying to get from one mega-city to another nearby mega-city. In these here United States we're all spread out. We like a little elbow room. Trains do work well in our high population areas in the east. New York, Philly, DC, Boston. Connect all those areas with trains and we're set. Outside of that we're just too spread out for it to be cost effective.
Someone who understands the difference. And then where we have high densities, they are mostly distant from each other.

BTW, be thankful the US has the wide open (relatively) spaces it has. Not many inhabitable places on earth do.
 

We-Todd-Did

New member
May 2, 2007
2,711
941
0
This thread makes me think of this video:

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
I guess I'm older because any mention of train makes a little voice in my brain yell "Soooooouulll Train!".
 

RacerX.ksr

New member
Sep 17, 2004
121,639
26,414
0
Fastest train is 374 mph. That was to set a record though, they don't go that fast normally.
 

LadyCat92

New member
May 22, 2002
20,127
666
0
Infrastructure investment is the barrier to entry. I lived in Asia and used the trains a lot and loved it but I didn't have a car, so it gave me a lot of freedom that I wouldn't have had otherwise. I used them in Europe while traveling on business and the experience was positive. I've taken 30+ business trips via plane this year and if you could get me from Lexington to Miami is just a few hours with nothing more than a 15 min stop in ATL, I'd take the train in a heartbeat. You have a lot more freedom to move around in trains, while full they don't feel as crowded, you don't have all of the luggage issues, etc.

I don't think we'll ever see it in the USA, but I'd love to have it.
 

AustinTXCat

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2003
51,528
28,935
113
Totally agree with LadyCat. 3 years ago, my brother and I rode Deutsche Bahn ICE trains extensively. Here in the USA, I usually ride Amtrak 2-3x yearly in Texas or FL.

Acela Express operates in the northeast. While the train is not Euro or Asian quick, it's at least a step in the right direction. Another "high-speed" rail initiative, All Aboard Florida, is currently in progress for a line connecting Orlando with Miami. The route calls for 235 mile trips in 3 hours, and should commence operations in 2017. Station construction/expansion on both ends has already begun.
 

trueblujr

New member
Dec 14, 2005
29,881
435
0
America is too cheap or to invest in something of that magnitude. Plus there would be some activist group trying to protect some frog species that might get displaced by the route.